Nowadays, there are many energy sources for generating sustainable powers, but Kurdistan does not have that level of progression to use these sources. Every country needs to create something new for generating energy, and Kurdistan also needs to use these alternative energy sources for generating sustainable energy. There are a lot of alternative energy sources types and if we take examples of these sources we could say that they are solar powers, geothermal energy and the using of Biomass. Even though many people believe that Kurdistan does not need the harness of alternative energy, this essay argues that alternative energy should be harnessed in Kurdistan. Many people believe that harnessing alternative energy sources is not a good idea for Kurdistan because there are enough energy sources for generating energy. At first glance, using alternative energy sources needs the government a perfect cost, so this might be difficult for a partly government such as Kurdistan. As everyone knows that Kurdistan is a small government that parted from Iraq's official government and all of the budgets for Kurdistan will come from the official government of Iraq, so if the official government of Iraq is not agree with giving budgets for using alternative energy sources in Kurdistan, Kurdistan will not receive the perfect budget for using these alternative energy sources. Another reason is that Kurdistan is one of the richest areas in the Middle East for having big amount of oil and gas, so there is no need to use alternative energy sources if there is already a reliable source for generating energy. People think that this is an acceptable reason for disagreeing with harnessing alternative energy sources in Kurdistan. Furthermore, alt... ... middle of paper ... ...mportant reason of harnessing alternative energy sources in Kurdistan is that there will be more job opportunities for the young people who want to work, and there will be a new budget for the country when they use these alternative energy sources by saving a lot of extra energies. These were some reasons for harnessing alternative energy sources in Kurdistan. To conclude, this essay argued that alternative energy sources should be harnessed in Kurdistan, and highlighted three important reasons for harnessing and not harnessing the alternative energy sources in Kurdistan. We could say that there are more reasons for harnessing these sources than not harnessing them in Kurdistan. Harnessing alternative energy has some important benefits for Kurdistan. In my opinion alternative energy sources should be harnessed in Kurdistan because it has a lot of benefits.
Arguments: America is dependent on other nations for their ability to create energy. The United States is the world’s largest consumer of oil, at 18.49 million barrels of oil per day. And it will continue to be that way for the foreseeable future, considering the next largest customer of oil only consumes about 60% of what the U.S. does. This makes the U.S. vulnerable to any instability that may arise in the energy industry. In 2011, the world’s top three oil companies were Saudi Aramco (12%), National Iranian Oil Company (5%), and China National Petroleum Corp (4%).
...gy can successfully replace oil. Just as oil will not run out overnight, its replacement will be equally gradual. The success of this transition is largely contingent on time management. Presently, there is no nation privy to a miracle solution. A bulk of available alternative energy sources are not self sufficient, and require oil to jump start their production. Solar panels, while a step in the right direction, are built in factories, shipped in trucks, flown in planes dependent on oil. Oil needs to be conserved, reserved solely for uses that will benefit future generations, such as creating green energy products. As long as there exists a shadow of a doubt as to the inevitability of peak oil, the existence of debate serves not only as an obstacle, but as a cause for hope. When everyone is forced to acknowledge the peak oil issue, it may very well be too late.
Alternative energy is the world’s race as of now. As the space race concluded and the nuclear arms race died down, alternative energy became the race of the ages. In today’s society, with today’s technology there are all sorts of forms of alternative energies. These energies include hydro power, geothermal, biomass, nuclear power, and so much more. With all of these variations of alternative energy the question now becomes, which form is the best to use? Are any of them safe? Which ones would effectively solve the world’s depleting energy crisis? Of course, the country that is able to produce clean efficient energy; that country would become the new world power virtually overnight. With today’s technology, should we resort to food/corn as our primary source of energy?
The United States has many directions to choose from in the oncoming future of energy. “Options for the world's energy future may include surprises, thanks to innovative research under way around the world” (LePoire 1). History has shown that surprises can change generations . Since the mid 1900’s, experts have been conducting research on the way our nation has been using energy. The United States have relied on other countries to gain knowledge with their energy sources. China is one huge partner that helps them out a lot. They have experimented with many different alternative energy sources and have given the U.S lots of helpful information for improving our energy demands. Even though we already meet most of our energy requirements, we still look into improving it everyday to improve our way of living. Despite its ability to be supplied with other nations to be supplied with other nations, the U.S. must invest in alternative power sources if it is to meet the energy demands of the 21st century.
“Where does our power come from?”, when asked, many people would not know the answer to this question. Some might say wind, water, or solar, but the main providers of America’s power are coal plants and nuclear reactors running to keep the lights on. Unfortunately, there is no free energy, it comes at a cost to the environment and its inhabitants. So when the choice arises to change the way humanity looks at our consumption of power, why choose the way we do things? Because the time has come for us as a country and the world to make the switch from the old to the new.
In the long, increased amounts of renewable energies are more likely to encourage the use of natural gas as a complementary source of power. Natural gas plants have the operational flexibility to vary their production rapidly, so this will allow them to be able to provide more reliability to the electric power system as it transitions to greater shares of renewable generation.
The main points I presented included whether or not to utilize alternative sources, such as: Geothermal, biofuels, or solar. Another stance on the topic is to remain using generic fossil fuels, such as coal and oil. The common ground would be to use both alternative sources and traditional fuels to sustain efficiency. There are multiple benefits to alternative sources. Benefits of biofuels include the fact that they can come from a variety of sources, such as plant materials, crops, and recycled vegetable oils, as per Christopher Cone of Science Progress stated. Another source is biodiesel, which replaces standard diesel. If utilized, it can reduce greenhouse gas emissions, secure energy supplies, and promote the standardization of renewable energy. More positives of alternative sources suggest possible tax exempts, lower costs overall, coming from domestic sources, and also the availability of blending with multiple sources at a time. Possible negatives include the disadvantage of being limited or refined by OEM companies (Original Equipment Manufacturers) and scarcity of refueling options. The Environmental Defense Fund suggests, “using alternative sources, as traditional fossil fuels are known to cause health concerns…” (EDF). These health concerns include toxic compounds attacking organs, causing brain damage, or possible death. In parts of the country where lakes and waterways have been contaminated with mercury from
According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, over half of the oil used in the USA is imported. Most of this imported oil is located in the middle east and is controlled by OPEC members. Subsequent oil price shocks and price manipulation by OPEC have cost our economy dearly—about $1.9 trillion from 2004 to 2008—and each major shock was followed by a recession (Reduce). We may never be able to fully eliminate our need to import oil, but we can reduce cartel market control and the economic impact of price shocks by reducing our demand (Reduce). One way we can reduce our reliance on oil is through investing in renewable energy. Solar power, wind power, and hydro power are all forms of energy which come from renewable resources. Unlike oil, solar, wind and hydro electric power is abundant and can be obtained locally.
Alternative energy does not focus on the burning of fuel, nor the nuclear process. Alternative energy is basically an alternative to fossil fuels. Fossil fuels include coal, oil, or even natural gas. One day coal and oil will eventually run out, and the cost of these is getting more and more expensive by the day. We can reuse alternative energy, but no matter what energy sources we use, there will always be pros and cons.
In conclusion, Indonesia energy system meets both risks and opportunities in globalization, however Indonesia nation’s vision should look ahead for what is required for a sustainable future.
With the depletion of fossil fuel resources comes speculations and debates about alternative energy sources. The world, including the Philippines, is practically dependent on a dwindling non-renewable source of energy. Today, experts are debating about and considering three options: Nuclear, Solar, or Wind Energy. Everyone has been accustomed to the bad image of nuclear energy as a result of the Chernobyl and Fukushima incidents above all others. The popular belief is that radiation from a nuclear meltdown is very harmful to humans and other living things—which is true—and that nuclear power plants are very dangerous and not ideal—which is not. According to Smith, et. al (n.d), all the nuclear disasters that ever occurred were caused by human error and natural disasters like tsunamis, not one because of system failure. Putting the false beliefs aside, with proper engineering and adequate maintenance by experts, a nuclear power plant is a very ideal and viable source of energy for the following reasons:
For years man has relied on energy in order to be successful in life. The industrial revolution relied on coal for the new inventions brought into the world. Life as has never been the same since then. However since that time, there has been little done to improve on energy efficiency and humans still primarily rely on fossil fuels for energy. For over a hundred years the Earth has become more polluted and dirtier than ever before. Now, with new, innovative technology there is an opportunity to change that and to rely on renewable, cleaner sources of energy. The main source of energy for the world should be alternative energy instead of energy from fossil fuels.
In addition to, a huge issue with non-renewable energy is the fact that we get most of it from foreign countries. According to a recent study done by Energy Information Administration, “58% of our petroleum comes from outside the country”, this means as some speculate, that o...
middle of paper ... ... g the Energy Revolution." Foreign Affairs. Nov/Dec 2010: 111. SIRS Issues Researcher.
In 21st century almost all devices work with electricity. Electricity makes activity of people easier and more comfortable. Moreover, it plays a great role in development of medicine, science, education, transport and other spheres of human’s life. However, electricity production is becoming more and more problematic because the biggest part of energy for electricity is produced by natural resources, which are neither infinite nor renewable. It means that one day mineral reserves can run out, and, as a result, there will be risk of possible energy crisis. This situation stimulates humanity to transfer to renewable power system. Countries around the world are promoting sustainable energy policies, particularly to reduce greenhouse effect that contributes to severe problems such as Global warming and acid rain (Energy Information Administration (EIA) 2010). The problem of alternative energy source search is also popular in Kazakhstan. Kazakhstan is extremely abundant in natural resources, especially in fossil fuels, which are mainly used as energy sources to generate electricity (CIA Factbook 2011). To be more precise, almost 60% of 4.6 billion kilowatt energy that was produced in Kazakhstan in 2008 came from coal, nearly 35 % - from natural gas and oil, 3% of electricity was created by hydro and nuclear electric stations and rest energy was imported from Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan (EIA 2010). It seems that the electricity production in Kazakhstan is mainly based on coal and other minerals. Therefore it is important to find an alternative source of energy in Kazakhstan to reduce its reliance on coal and to avoid power crisis and other negative effects of non-renewable energy usage. Since the territory of Kazakhstan is ...