All Politics Are Not National States Are Powerful Summary

442 Words1 Page

The discussion taking place about weather national politics matter more than state politics have multiple reasons to support either argument. In this analysis, the problem being addressed in “All Politics Are Not National, States Are Powerful” is the argument that state politics within the nation are more preset and more important to the daily lives of Americans (Brown L., 2013). The article states that life in general is implemented within state boundaries such as owning property within the state, voting, and employment possibilities. Most importantly, the author states that the most critical part of the argument that state politics matter more than national politics is the fact that all individuals in the country follow and live by more state laws opposed to federal laws (Brown L., 2013). On the other hand, the article “The Federal Government Hold the Power” presented in this analysis discusses why national politics is …show more content…

Madison stated, “the first and most natural attachment of the people will be to the government of their respective states”. However, “The Federal Government Hold the Power” opposes my position of the argument due to the fact that Judis says that states have tried weakening power of federal government, but the federal government overcame power regardless. Judis is implicating that it was already determined that national politics had already had power over states when the constitution was being addressed in 1789. My position of the argument in this analysis is that state politics matters more than national politics because of how personally involved I am in state issues and laws as well as the rest of the nation. My position is correct in a sense that Americans follow and abide by state laws and are more politically involved in voting because of state actions rather than national

Open Document