Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Why is conflict inevitable in industrial relations
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Why is conflict inevitable in industrial relations
ALL INDIA MANUFACTURERS' ORGANISATION All India Manufacturers' Organisation (AlMO) was founded by Dr. M. Visvesvaraya way back in 1941. 'Prosperity through Industry' is the motto of this organisation. It has its headquarters in Bombay and a network of offices throughout the country. The aim of AlMO is to promote economic development through sustained dialogue between trade and industry and Government agencies. The major objectives of the AlMO are as follows:
(i) Bring about rapid industrialisation of the country through sound and progressive policies. •
(ii) Help in increasing aggregate output in India.
(iii) Raise the standard of living of the people of India by utilising to the fullest possible extent all the available national resources and talents in the country. Play positive role in relieving the pressure of population on land.
Functioning of AIMO The AlMO offers several invaluable services to the members. Besides acting as a liasion agency between the manufacturers and the Government, it provides professional services to members in the areas of import-export,
…show more content…
They bring with them some carryover effect from the past which signifies the existence of conflict between the labour and management. Though industrial peace and harmony - may be sought as an organisational objective, some conflict is inherent in the industrial structure. In fact, conflict is endemic to industrial society. Labour and management conflict exist in numerous ways in the course of their daily work. Conflict of interests of management and labour is the progeny of the capitalist form of economic organisation. But it is not only the sharing of the fruits of industry that generate conflicts; the very fact of the existence of the wide cleft of authority between the ''hands that produce" and the "hands that control" the means of production has become a major source of conflict between management and
Since the worker’s product is owned by someone else, the worker regards this person, the capitalist, as alien and hostile. The worker feels alienated from and antagonistic toward the entire system of private property through which the capitalist appropriates both the objects of production for his own enrichment at the expense of the worker and the worker’s sense of identity and wholeness as a human being.
David Brody argues that the rise of contractual or collective bargaining relationships during the post WWII era formalized the relationship between employers and unions, but simultaneously began to put a break on shop floor activism. Explain Brody’s argument and, where relevant, incorporate Weber’s theory of bureaucracy.
The factory workers are stuck in a complicated position where they are taken advantage of and exploited. While “exploitation occurs on any level” these factory workers do not have the opportunity to exploit others because they are the ones being exploited (Timmerman 7). Tension is created between the corporations, factory owners and workers, because the factory owners force the workers into harsh labor and intense working conditions that they were told
Factories were known for their ill treatment of their employees, long hours and dirty and unsafe conditions. In 1866, unions started to form to improve working conditions for the workers. A fundamental problem faced by democratic societies is as long as people live their lives individually and go their separate ways and be selfish individuals, they are unlikely to meet collectively to resolve issues. There needs to be meaningful unity among people to alleviate this problem to get people obliged to one another, so there is a willingness to sacrifice for shared goals. Bonding of its citizens creates a democracy. Unions seemed to offer the middle class a chance to become a crucial part of fostering institutions of constitutional democracy. The unions have went through several transitions, but have always worked for the working force. I will discuss the history of the various unions, their wins and losses, and the struggle of the employee to achieve democracy in the workplace.
The evolvement of machinery represents an expansion of human capacities; human control increases over the environment through the ability of production of increasing range and exactitude of response. But the technical development that the control over the machine need no longer be on its operator. This possibility is seized upon by the capitalist mode of production and utilized to the fullest extent. Both of these interests must be antagonistic. The people in charge need to come together and put both of these interests together. These people of higher standard need to come up with a way to bring the special needs of those who own the machine and the labor power, and also the ones who bring the machine and the labor power together.
In different industries, there are companies that operate for a purpose, but the bottom line is the management style between supervisors and subordinate can break or make an organization. Organizations and businesses have to run their management a certain way in order to motivate their employees. The main type of organization management is the Classical Theory which contains Theory X. There are five key employee conflict management styles. Building relationships between employees and managers is crucial for an organization to function and execute their purpose whether it is to provide a service or product. Both theories and conflict strategies were present in the film “Office Space” to demonstrate the negatives of corrupt management and ongoing conflicts which were not resolved that led to destruction.
But most prominently, it portrays the evident social disparity between the upper-class and the lower-class. The aforementioned 'upper-class' refers to the bourgeoisie. "When modern industry was formed in the world market, the fast spreading industry helped the bourgeoisie to develop. According to Marx, the bourgeoisie is the result of a long way development, it was the product of the revolutions in the aspect of product and exchange"7 The entire relationship between the bourgeoisie and the proletariat is based on oppression. One cannot exist without the other, and the role of the bourgeoisie reaches it's crux when it is pushing the 'lower class' further down the hierarchy. the oppression is a given, in order to increase the profits incurred by the producer. In relation to class conflict George and Wilding8 comment, "Protests and demonstrations, both peaceful and violent, wage negotiations and strikes, voting at parliamentary and local elections, political debates and so on are all part and parcel of the ongoing class conflict that is inherent in a capitalist
Producing goods or services are dictated not by employees but by their employers. If profits exist, employers are the ones that benefit more so than the regular worker. “Even when working people experience absolute gains in their standard of living, their position, relative to that of capitalists, deteriorates.” (Rinehart, Pg. 14). The rich get richer and the poor get poorer. Hard work wears down the employee leaving them frustrated in their spare time. Workers are estranged from the products they produce. At the end of the day, they get paid for a day’s work but they have no control over the final product that was produced or sold. To them, productivity does not equal satisfaction. The products are left behind for the employer to sell and make a profit. In discussions with many relatives and friends that have worked on an assembly line, they knew they would not be ...
India, the second highest populated country in the world after China, with 1.27 billion people currently recorded to be living there and equates for 17.31% (India Online Pages 2014) of the world's population, but is still considered a developing country due to it’s poverty and illiteracy rates. As these nations continue to grow at rates that are too fast for resources to remain sustainable, the government’s in these areas wi...
...an HDI of 0.36. These discrepancies in levels of development have led to an exodus of people, from less developed areas to the areas that have been benefitted by development. This situation seems to depict that predicted by the Dependency theory in which the developed countries progressed due to the exploitation of peripheral nations; the same seems to be happening in India. The states that are wealthier are exploiting the poorer states. It would be difficult to imagine India having the economic status that it now has, if it was not for the terrible working conditions and wages at which the Indians are willing to work and the massive work force available in the country. Now that India has seen economic growth the government should start taking care of its citizens by implementing policies that protect the labor rights of the workforce.
This is because, capitalism favours high production and low costs, to do this, workers must have designated, specialised tasks, in what Marx called the “division of labour.” In ‘The German Ideology,’ Marx argues, that division of labour when “not voluntarily, but naturally divided,” causes man’s labour to become “an alien power opposed to him.” The worker is unable to recognise themselves in the product of their labour. The reason for this is the aforementioned ‘division of labour,’ which increases a factories production, but results in workers who are unable to differentiate their work from the work of others, as the object has become an amalgamation of theirs and others work. In this way capitalism disguises the labour necessary for an object’s production from its consumers.
It is among the largest engineering companies in Malaysia with a growth rate of over 20% for four consecutive years and is among the best managed companies in Asia. It is among the most transparent and therefore leads on the issue of corporate governance. It enjoys incredible growth in sales shareholder and has a base of nearly 1 million. L & T is the core of a group of companies involved in building complexes, worksheets, offices and service outlets at different locations all over Malaysia and abroad. L & T has an incredible reputation for capabilities for executing engineering related projects. This has been enhanced by it long business history which date back in 1938 to present. It provides real and logical synergy in terms of executing turnkey projects for construction, engineering, supplying machinery and suppliers credit. Further, by the use of Total Quality Management (TQM) principles e.g. customer focused, reducing costs and wastage, and adding value at all stages for maximising customer satisfaction and emphasis on 'customer delight '. The company therefore delivers more value than expected by customer. It has ability to synthesise, incorporate and complement its diverse world-class engineering, manufacturing, procurement, construction and fabrication skills around turnkey projects and people. L & T has a world class vendor base and quality technological alliances, excellent IT
The concept of industrial relations involves the interaction of employers and employees, for that reason without power and authority will be a lack of direction and control over the system of industrial relations. Authority frequently comes from the duties and responsibilities delegated to a position holder in a bureaucratic structure whilst Power is the possession of authority, control, or influence by which a person influences the actions of others, either by direct authority or by some other, added intangible
In the end, I would like to conclude that, conflict is not necessarily always good or bad. It is only the consequences of the conflict that are good or bad. An effective management always identifies the conflicts with the bad consequences and brings them to an end as soon as possible and at the same time encourages healthy conflicts that give rise to good results.
The Marxist approach looks at industrial relations from a societal perspective. It views industrial relations as a small-scale version of a capitalist society. This approach surrounds itself with the assumption that industrial relations under capitalism are unavoidable, and thus would be a source of conflict. According to Marxist, industrial conflict is central to industrial relations, however actual altercations are uncommon. The approach also sees this as a form ...