Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
quality management chapter 8
quality improvement proposal
Quality Improvement Plan Part 3
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: quality management chapter 8
The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH Act), which was passed as part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, has fostered significant progress in the adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in various clinical settings, particularly through the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs and its focus on EHR adoption in Stage 1 Meaningful Use (CITATION gov). For instance, as a result of the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs, the percentage of office based physicians who have adopted an EHR system dramatically rose from 18.2% in 2001 to a staggering 78.4% in 2013 (CITATION phys data). Additionally, as of July 2013, 67% of hospitals achieved Stage 1 Meaningful Use and an additional 16% were paid for adopting EHRs (CITATION hosp data).
However, despite the $24 billion of federal spending allocated towards EHR adoption, the benefits of EHR adoption still have not been even close to fully realized (CITATION 24 b). Specifically, duplicate and unnecessary medical testing, which EHRs were set out to address, still presents a significant financial burden and, more importantly, less efficient and effective patient care from a lack of care coordination and provider communication (CITATION issue brief). In fact, a recent Boston study found that 20% of the patients transferred between hospitals underwent duplicate, unnecessary medical tests that were performed within the last 12 hours (CITATION boston).
These issues manifest themselves in two ways. First, the criteria set out for Stage 1 Meaningful Use overlooked EHR vendors' lack of incentives or requirements to design their EHR systems in such a way that makes them able to easily transfer patient data to other providers ...
... middle of paper ...
...ck of EHR interoperability, there are inevitably several challenges that must be considered in order to ensure that these solutions are successfully carried out.
Medicare and Medicaid Incentive Programs – Stage 2 Meaningful Use
Although most physicians may be prepared to attest to Stage 2 Meaningful Use, several of the stakeholders that they interact with may not, which may compromise their ability to fulfill all of the Stage 2 Meaningful Use criteria and lead to Medicare reimbursement penalties as a result of factors that they have no control over. For instance, there are currently no federal incentives home health agencies or skilled nursing facilities to adopt EHRs, which presents a foregone opportunity for physicians to complete electronic summary of care documents when they perform transitions of care or referrals to these care settings (CITE narsin' homezzz).
Stage 1: This stage is primarily for meaningful use of an EHR in a clinical setting. The EHR technology the physician uses must meet at least 15 requirements and 5 “menu” criteria that are listed in the HITECH Act. The EHR used must be able to store patient demographic information, an e-prescribing with drug interaction alert content, and contain patient’s insurance information.
The federal government has taken a stance to standardized care by creating incentive programs that are mandated under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) of 2009. This act encourages healthcare providers and healthcare institutions to adopt Meaningful use in order to receive incentives from Medicare and Medicaid. Meaningful use is the adoption of a certified health record system that acquires or obtains specified objectives about a patient. The objectives or measures are considered gold standard practices with the EHR system. Examples of the measures include data entry of vital signs, demographics, allergies, entering medical orders, providing patients with electronic copies of their records, and many more pertinent information regarding the patient (Friedman et al, 2013, p.1560).
Portability can improve patient care. Patients no longer have to “tote” their cumbersome medical records around anymore. EHR’s give physicians and clinicians access to critical healthcare information in the palm of their hand, which ultimately leads to improved patient care outcomes. EHR’s also provide security to vital medical and personal healthcare information. Organizations like HIPPA defines policies, procedures and guidelines for preserving the privacy and security of discrete distinguishable health information (HHS.gov,
The federal government has encouraged EHR use in hopes that it will significantly improve patient care. There is the intent that electronic health records will allow any provider access to important patient health information no matter where the patient is, while “creating a comprehensive national electronic health information network that leads to a reduction in the duplication of tests, an improvement in the cost-effectiveness of interventions, and the ability to compile a comprehensive patient history” (McBride, Delaney, Tietze, 2012). While the implementation of EHR’s has good intent, an important question is, “How are the implementation of EHRs having an effect on emergency nursing and patient care?”
In 2009 President Obama, through the American Reinvestment and Recovery Act, pledged to provide incentives to the nation’s physicians and hospitals to convert to an electronic healthcare system in attempt to improve the quality of care and reduce cost (Freudenheim, 2010). By converting to an electronic system, we have the opportunity for improved communication between all healthcare providers and decreased cost to our healthcare system. The goal is to improve communication across all aspects of the service chain (Horan, Botts & Burkhard, 2010). Almost two years later, the conversion progress continues to be slow. Only one in four physician’s offices, mostly large groups, have implemented the electronic record system (Freudenheim, 2010).
“An electronic health record (EHR) is a digital version of a patient’s paper chart. EHRs are real-time, patient-centered records that make information available instantly and securely to authorized users.” (healthit.gov) The EHR mandate was created “to share information with other health care providers and organizations – such as laboratories, specialists, medical imaging facilities, pharmacies, emergency facilities, and school and workplace clinics – so they contain information from all clinicians involved in a patient’s care.” ("Providers & Professionals | HealthIT.gov", n.d., p. 1) The process has proved to be quite challenging for providers. As an incentive, the government began issuing payments to those providers who “meaningfully use certified electronic health record (EHR) technology.” (hhs.gov) There are three stages that providers must progress through in order to receive theses financial incentives. Stage one is the initial stage and is met with the creation and implementation of the HER in the business. Stage two “increases health information exchange between providers.” ("United States Department of Health and Human Services | HHS.gov", n.d., p. 1) Stage three will be the continuation and expansion of the “meaningful use objectives.” ("United States Department of Health and Human Services | HHS.gov", n.d., p. 1) The hospital, where I work, initiated the HER mandate many years ago. In this paper, I will discuss the progression and the challenges that my hospital encountered while implementing the EHR mandate.
The result is that the volume of data and its management is a burden on the provider and his/her staff. Eventually, as EHR use becomes usual, patients will begin to recognize enhanced healthcare results.
The third stage will take place in 2016.The objectives will be based on improving safety, efficiency, and quality of the EHR’s which will lead to improved health outcomes. Also patients will have access to self- management tools, and decision support will be available for national high ...
The U. S government passed the American Recovery Act in 2009 that established incentives and penalties to promote EHR use. From this legislation the Meaningful Use Program for EHR’s s was created. Through The Meaningful Use Program the U.S. government is able to support the adoption and use of EHR technology to enhance and revolutionize health care. The goal of the program is to increase EHR adoption, improve quality, safety, reduce disparities, and improve public health (hmsa , 2012).
Unfortunately, the quality of health care in America is flawed. Information technology (IT) offers the potential to address the industry’s most pressing dilemmas: care fragmentation, medical errors, and rising costs. The leading example of this is the electronic health record (EHR). An EHR, as explained by HealthIT.gov (n.d.), is a digital version of a patient’s paper chart. It includes, but is not limited to, medical history, diagnoses, medications, and treatment plans. The EHR, then, serves as a resource that aids clinicians in decision-making by providing comprehensive patient information.
The EHR is defined as “an electronic record of health-related information on an individual that conforms to nationally recognized interoperability standards and that can be created, managed, and consulted by authorized clinicians and staff across more than one healthcare organization” (Fahrenholz, C. G. & Russo, R., 2013b). The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) has published a list of required items an EHR must have to satisfy the complete EHR definition. According to the ONC, the EHR must include, for both ambulatory and inpatient systems: computerized provider order entry, demographics, a problem list, a medication list, a medication allergy list, clinical decision support, transitions of care, data portability, clinical quality measures, authentication, access control and authorization, auditable events and tamper resistance, audit reports, amendments, automatic log-off, emergency access, end-user encryption, integrity, drug-drug and drug-allergy interaction checks, vital signs, body mass index and growth charts, electronic notes, drug-formulary checks, smoking status, image results, family health history, patient list creation, patient-specific education resources, electronic prescribing, clinical information reconciliation, incorporation of lab tests and values/results, immunization information, transmission to immunization registries, transmission to public health agencies-syndromic surveillance, automated measure calculation, a safety-enhanced design, a quality management system and be able to view, download and tra...
Maura, it is interesting that you mentioned how EMR/EHRs have evolved over the past few years and how organizations are now seeing the shortcoming of the applications and the vendors who are not able to provide the new functionality needed in the healthcare industry. Some vendors have blamed Meaningful Use and its requirements for limiting their ability to expand their product capabilities to provide interoperability (Sullivan, 2016). By increasing the adoption of EHRs, which were not fully developed to provide the interoperability needed to achieve the goals of the HITECH Act, vendors had to commit resources to the sale and implementation of new client systems, rather than devoting those resources to product development.
Advances in technology have influences our society at home, work and in our health care. It all started with online banking, atm cards, and availability of children’s grades online, and buying tickets for social outings. There was nothing electronic about going the doctor’s office. Health care cost has been rising and medical errors resulting in loss of life cried for change. As technologies advanced, the process to reduce medical errors and protect important health care information was evolving. In January 2004, President Bush announced in the State of the Union address the plan to launch an electronic health record (EHR) within the next ten years (American Healthtech, 2012).
Studies have implied that, healthcare professionals who practice clinical features through EHR were far more likely provide better preventive care than were healthcare professionals who did not. (page 116). From 2004, EHR has initiated, even the major priority of President Obama’s agenda is EHR (Madison & Stagger, 2011). Health care administration considers EHR as the introduction of advanced technology which can improve patient satisfaction are can increase the financial incentives of the healthcare organization. Studies have pointed out that the federal policy is proposed to transform all medical records into EHR (Hebda & Calderone, 2010).