Alfred The Great Research Paper

1329 Words3 Pages

Alfred the Great was the king of Wessex from 871 to 899. Alfred had become the dominant leader of England before he had died. Alfred was the most influential Anglo-Saxon ruler. Alfred understood the importance of being able to communicate properly and intelligently from a young age (Ashely). Alfred wanted free-born boys to be literate in his kingdom. He knew the importance of communication between his people hence why he would influence education. Alfred had began to learn English and Latin between (893-899) (Ashley). English was a growing language and Alfred had realized the importance of having a common language. Alfred found Philosophy, Religion and history to be important. In alfred’s early years he began translating Latin for others, …show more content…

When Alfred had defeated the Vikings his people had found themselves trusting him. However, the representation of Alfred and what he stood for was fiercely contested, and conservatives and liberal imperialists endorsed the events and appropriated the meaning of Alfred's legacy for their own political arguments and journalism (Heathorn). His intellect, imagination, and energy seemed to grow in his last years. On his death in 899, he left a record of achievement which earned him his reputation as the greatest Anglo-Saxon king, as well as a legacy of military preparedness and strategy on which were based the victorious campaigns of his immediate successors against the Danes (“Alfred …show more content…

“The prose Proem prefaces the prose-only manuscript, Manuscript B, as well as the prosimetrum, Manuscript C, whose opening is sadly now preserved only in Junius's transcript due to the Cotton Library fire. (3) Why should a Proem that tells of the composition of the prosimetrum preface a latereopy of the earlier, prose-only version? More disturbing, this Proem imparts surprisingly little. It contains little information, all of which, save the order of composition, is available elsewhere. Unlike the Prefaces to the Pastoral Care and the Soliloquies, the Proem offers no imagery or sense of the importance of the work translated. (4) It is a thoroughly undistinguished, boring piece of prose. Alfred could write boring passages, of course, as he occasionally demonstrates in the Pastoral Care. But why would a king who clearly recognizes the importance of opening statements, as evident in all the other prefaces he writes to his own translations and to his Laws, toss off something so insignificant?” (Discenza). Discenza notes how he believes someone else had written the Proem and wanted their work to get the attention they thought it deserved, Alfred’s work was always praised hence why someone would want to claim his name. Before Alfred could read he was read Anglo-Saxon poetry which he would memorize (“Alfred”). “Asser, his biographer, says that on one occasion he was stimulated to learn these

Open Document