Alexander the Great

678 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essay outline on alexander the great impact on society

Alexander the Great has us all confused with him as great but he is not great, he should be known as Alexander the Devious. Alexander should be known as a villain not a hero.

Alexander the great is very forceful. If people didn’t do what Alexander wanted them to do then it would end very badly. He was forceful in a bad way. He forced people to do things that they didn’t want to do. Alexander the Great forced people to give him their town. If the town did not oblige to this then their would be very bad consequences, Alexander would destroy your town and kill most of you people. Whoever he didn’t kill became slaves. “The towns and cities that resisted him would be burned to the ground, and their people sold into slavery” (Learn TCI, Alexander Creates An Empire). This obviously shows that Alexander wanted everyone to follow him. If they didn’t they would get burned down and he would make them all slaves. This means that Alexander was a villain.

Alexander was very arrogant. His actions showed that he felt that he was better than everyone. He made people do things that he wanted him to do. He also destroyed cities if they didn’t do what he wanted them to do. Any time that someone would see him. Alexander the great made them bow down to him. The person had to bow down, so far that their heads touched the ground. This shows that Alexander felt that he should be treated better than other people. “ A visitor had to kneel in front of the throne and bend over until his head touched the ground” (Learn TCI, How Alexander Adopted the Ways of Conquered Cultures) This obviously shows that Alexander wanted everyone to treat him as if he was something special. He wanted everyone to bow down to him and be loyal to him.

Alexander is very d...

... middle of paper ...

...or get burned down to the ground. “The towns and cities that resisted him would be burned to the ground, and their people sold into slavery” (Learn TCI, Alexander Creates An Empire). Alexander masked the bad things he did with good things that are really bad.
Alexander the Great was not great. He is a villain. He will always be a villain and he always was. Alexander should not be called great because he is anything but. Alexander treated people unfairly. He forced them to do what they didn’t want to do. He was devious and used their religion against them. He was arrogant and thought he was the best person in the world and deserved to get treated better. He also killed a lot of innocent lives by making their whole towns slaves and fighting them for ten years until he finally conquered them. Alexander the Great was anything but great.

Works Cited

learntci.com

Show More
Related

  • Alexander’s Vast Accomplishments as a Conquerer

    966 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander began his military campaign and his rule much where his father left off. Whether or not it was his aim, this created a sense of normality for the men that was part of his father’s regime. Alexander’s position as a warrior-king who stood side-by-side among his men also served to create respect among his peers. Gradually, as Alexander conquered more Persian land, he began to adopt the policies of Persian rulers. Alexander’s change in policy extended beyond just political roles, he gave consideration to the local gods in many of the lands that he conquered. Eventually, Alexander brought people in from the conquered nations to serve under him.

    Read More

  • What Are Alexander Hamilton's Political Views

    546 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander believed in a strong national government and he feared a weak government that the people could overthrow. If we lived in Syria or any other war-torn country right now, it would be the complete opposite because Alexander’s views are different from theirs. Though he had changed his views a few times, it seems that his final opinion was one that he truly believed in. In our country now, his

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great DBQ

    458 Words  | 1 Pages

    Alexander was Great because of his leadership. When Alexander went into battle, he used lots of complicated strategies to win. Due to the teachings of Aristotle, he was a force to reckoned with. One example comes from Doc B.The battle was set in India, against a king named Porus. He had more than 30 elephants under his control. The one thing that separated them was a shallow river. The document tells us that he would “Take his cavalry to various positions along the river bank where he would create a clamor… This went on for quite a time until Porus no longer reacted” Alexander used great strategy to outsmart his enemy.

    Read More

  • Leadership Qualities in Alexander the Great

    653 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...f the conquered territories to remain relatively unchanged, Alexander was able to subdue potential unrest before it occurred. However, Alexander’s rule was not without discord though. Many Machiavellian actions for the good of the empire were seen as unsavory to a select few. While this created some distrust, Alexander’s power and governing expertise were enough to overcome these adversities. Because of the characteristics mentioned above, Alexander the Great is as close to a true Machiavellian ruler as humanly possible.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    Many small government officials took pieces of land, changing the laws and affecting the citizens in big ways. Ten years later, the empire fell apart, leaving people with many burdens. Alexander left his empire after he died in a big mess, hoping someone could help him. This was unsmart because even though death might not be expected, it is always important to create a will with as much at stake as there was in Alexander’s situation. In summary, Alexander was not smart because he wasn’t able to think ahead to help his empire stay strong.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: Alexander The Great

    1085 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great (July 356BC – June 323BC) was King of the ancient Greek Kingdom of Macedon. By the age of thirty he had created one of the largest empires of the ancient world. He remained undefeated in battle and is considered one of history’s most successful Military commanders. Historians’ have offered theories which could explain Alexander’s motivation to conquer so much of the known world. Some suggest that Alexander was an idealistic visionary who sought to unite the world, whereas others argued that he was a fascist whose hunger for power drove him. The Ancient Greeks were driven by love of honour (philotimaea) and their desire for greatness. They were competitive, always striving to better one another.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Diodorus And Plutarch

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    Diodorus, and Plutarch make Alexander seem very arrogant in their writing because of his impossible goals and plans. Alexander was originally Macedonian, but over the years, he adopted many different cultures. During Alexander’s rule, he conquered many nations and won many battles. He was very confident in himself. Additionally, it is clear that historians wished to highlight his goal to unite the world and create one culture. In Plutarch’s The Mixing of Barbarians and Greeks, Plutarch explains Alexander’s goal to unify

    Read More

  • Was Alexander The Great Selfish

    1711 Words  | 4 Pages

    The son of Philip II, Alexander the Great, will become the conqueror of the western world. Alexander received the Macedonian empire when his father passed, he was only twenty at the time. As soon as he had the power of the Macedonian army, several lightning fast campaigns led them into the west and north. Next, he compelled the city-states that rebelled against the League of Corinth. This action demonstrated how Alexander punished disloyalty [Martin 244]. Alexander was able to keep his rule on the territories he conquered by rewarded the cities who recognized his powers and punished the individuals that betrayed his trust or ambitions. The power he possessed depended on his superior force and his unwillingly desire to use it [Martin 245]. The

    Read More

  • Why Alexander The Great Is A Villain

    910 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great:An Analysis Thesis:Alexander the Great is a villain because Alexander the Great murdered and tortured people for no reason,he also took over cities against their own will. Alexander the Great is a villain because Alexander the Great murdered and tortured many people. This man came to civilizations and Alexander the Great took them under his rule,if one did not follow one were tortured. He also killed people just as a warning that Alexander the Great actually wasn't dead. According to Alexander the not so great Paragraph 3 page 2 “Persians also condemn him for the widespread destruction Alexander the Great is thought to have encouraged to cultural and religious sites throughout the empire.”

    Read More

  • Was Alexander The Great Really Great?

    943 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander the Great is great because of his remarkable achievement which helped to create a long lasting legacy. Alexander started to build his empire in 334 BCE after taking the new role as the king. It only took eleven years to build an empire that was large and lasted several years. In addition, the empire Alexander created stretched over 2,200,000 square miles becoming bigger than the United States (Alexander’s Empire Doc. A) (Alexander’s Legacy Doc, E). This proves that Alexander the Great is great because although the process was eleven long years to make a strong empire, Alexander wasn’t willing to give up and

    Read More

  • Alexander: The Not So Great

    1861 Words  | 4 Pages

    ...o hundred thousand murders during Alexander’s reign of terror into account. Alexander the Great was not so great!

    Read More

  • Alexander II

    651 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander II has been considered “a great historical figure without being a great man, that what he did was more important than what he was.” ( W.E Mosse) For 26 years, Czar Alexander II ruled russia. During his reign, he made his mark on history by stepping outside of the box and going to extreme measures to help his people. He has been labeled as the “Liberator of tsar” for the ending of serfdom. Czar Alexander II of Russia has made an impact on history because of his interesting background, fatal assassination, and the changes made after his assassination.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great

    1463 Words  | 3 Pages

    There are many leaders in the world, but a great ruler is passionate, honorable and one who can inspire even in the most hopeless circumstances. Alexander the Great was a great ruler. Alexander the Great was a ruler that was not only inspiring, but he was fearless, smart, bold and courageous. Alexander the Great inspired his soldiers to crave more. He has inspired people since the day he started ruling. What is inspirational about Alexander the Great is that he inspired his troops to the point that they did not question him when they were outnumbered three to one in a battle, they trusted him with their lives and were willing to die for him (Alexander the Great: man behind the legend).

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: The Success Of Alexander The Great

    2043 Words  | 5 Pages

    But he was not well liked, he had a violent temper and a tendency to be cruel to those who opposed him. He was obeyed more out of fear than any sort of real affection for the man. But, he was human and did have redeeming qualities. He was compassionate to women and children, when Darius deserted his family in fear of Alexander, he treated them with the respect they deserved as member of the royal family. And later, when King Darius was murdered, Alexander found his murderer and put him to death. It would seem that Alexander saw his world as black and white, right and wrong. There did not seem to be a gray area with

    Read More

  • Essay On Alexander The Great

    574 Words  | 2 Pages

    Have you ever wondered why Alexander from Macedonia is called Alexander the Great. According to history, it is because he is the most glorious general in the history who conquered Persia, Greece, Egypt and Babylon in a very inexperienced age. He became the commander of Macedonian armies at age eighteen and the king of Macedonia at age twenty. After six years of preparation, he conquered the great Persian empire. Unfortunately, he died at age thirty-three. He would have conquered many lands if he hadn’t died at a such young age. He was a legend and an icon for great kings like Charlemagne, Julius Caesar, and Pompey. World’s most famous generals tried to compete with him but they couldn’t accomplish. After years, his tomb

    Read More

More about Alexander the Great

Open Document