The social learning theory proposed by Albert Bandura has become one of the most influential theories of learning and behaviour. The theory added a social element, arguing that people can learn new information and behaviors by watching other people. Known as social learning theory or modeling, this type of learning can be used to explain a wide variety of behaviors. The social learning theory does not explain all learning and behaviour, it fails to account for biological and innate behaviours such as breathing, sucking and crying. People do not imitate all that they observe they stop and think about the costs and benefits. Certain behaviours are learned through classical and operant conditioning. In this essay the writer will discuss certain behaviours that are explained by the social learning theory and behaviours that are not explained by this theory.
Learning can be defined as a relatively permanent change in behaviour as a result of training or experience. Bandura (1977) suggests that “learning is a largely social process involving modeling of behaviours”. According to Bandura (1977) social leaning theory states that, “Behaviour is learned from the environment through the process of observational learning.” Observational learning can be defined as learning through imitating significant others.
Bandura (1977) believes that “humans are active information processors and think about the relationship between their behavior and its consequences.” Observational learning could not occur unless cognitive processes were at work. Learning is enhanced when the model is rewarded and is unlikely to take place if the model is punished. Bandura (1977) believes that “there are three core concepts at the heart of social learning theory.” Firs...
... middle of paper ...
...d by its consequences. Behaviour followed by a favorable outcome increases in frequency and that followed by unfavorable outcome decreases in frequency. For example, a child behaves well after given money or being praised. These theories also explain learning and behaviour
In conclusion, the social learning theory, even though it explains much learning and behaviour does not explain all learning and behaviour. Individuals observe and imitate models through observational learning but these individuals do not copy all that they observe, they stop and think about the costs and benefits. The social learning theory also fails to account for infants’ innate behaviours such as sucking, crying, grasp reflex and response to stimuli. The foundations of certain behaviours and personalities like aggression are biological and such behaviours are not a result of social learning.
The first subcategory is called the “Social Learning Theory”, which dictates that a person’s behavior is learned through negative external observations (Siegel & Worrall, 2013, p. 50).
Social learning theory was first developed by Robert L. Burgess and Ronald L Akers in 1966 (Social Learning theory, 2016). In 1973, Akers wrote a book entitled Deviant Behaviour: A Social Learning Approach, which discussed Aker’s conception of the social learning theory. He developed social learning theory by extending Sutherland’s theory of differential association (Cochran & Sellers, 2017). Social learning theory is based on the principles of Pavlov’s operant and classical conditioning. Akers believes that crime is like any other social behavior because it is learned through social interaction (Social Learning theory, 2016). Social learning theory states that the probability of an individual committing a crime or engaging in criminal behaviour is increased when they differentially associate with others who commit criminal behavior (Cochran & Sellers, 2017). Social learning theory is classified as a general theory of crime, and has been used to explain many types of criminal behaviour (Social Learning theory, 2016). Furthermore, social learning theory is one of the most tested contemporary theories of crime. There are four fundamental components of social learning theory; differential association, definitions, differential reinforcement and imitation (Social Learning theory,
The social learning theory “states that behavior is learned from the environment through observational learning” (McLeod, 2011). For instance, I saw my mom getting ready for church and eventually I noticed that she put her hair in a ponytail only on Sundays. Furthermore, after seeing her do this so many times I began doing the same thing on Sundays. As a child, I observed her every move and I wanted to imitate her behavior. Through observational learning, I learned what was socially acceptable by watching my mother’s
- - -. “Social-learning Theory:Observing and Imitating Models.” Human Development. 5th ed. New York: McGraw Hill, 1992. 213-14. Print.
Bandura agrees with Akers theory of social learning, however mediating processes occur between stimulus and responses, simultaneously, behavior is learned through observation within an
Through Social Learning Theory, an individual can be studied based on the behavior acquired by a role model. Verbal conditioning procedures and observation influences the response to an individual’s personality. Environment factors contribute to the Social Learning Theory. Antisocial model is a major contribute to crime, which influences negative characteristics. The Social Leaning Theory has three core social concepts the must be followed: observational learning, intrinsic reinforcement and modeling process.
According to Social Learning Theory, Bandura (1989) suggested cognitive factors cannot be overlooked if learning is needed to be understood. Bandura has also noted that while reward and punishment substantially shape one 's personality, cognition has as much impact as they do. Also, the principles of behavioural approach have mainly been tested on animals. It implies some findings may not be applicable to a human being, which as a creature is much more complex than an animal.
Bandura discusses the importance of observational learning. Bandura focuses mostly on how kids develop their habits based of their role models. Bandura shows this in the Bobo Doll Experiment. The Bobo Doll experiment consisted of 36 boys and 36 girls. They were then separated again into watching a video of a plastic doll called Bobo. Some children were separated by some adults aggressively beating up Bobo and the other half were calm adults. After they were showed the video, the kids were then shown to Bobo and the results matched the Social Learning Theory to the max. The kids that were show the aggressive videos were aggressive towards Bobo. Another Social Learning Theory can be told in my shoes because I have done something similar. I remember in fifth grade my older cousin would always ride his bike down the biggest hill without a helmet. I figured if he did and was okay, why can’t I? I learned the hard way and sliced my arm on a rock. Luckily I did not need stitches however, I did go to the doctors and got ointment for it. I still have the scar today. I feel like the Social Learning Theory has made an impact on my life because I have had the opportunity of having a role model. This role model has made a positive change to my life. Similar to Bobo, I have seen what negative role models have done for a person and how much it affects
Social Learning Theory- is learned by observing others in social situations, especially the family and the media, and by perceiving the benefits or rewards to the behavior (Isaacs, 2000).
One main theoretical position in social learning theory is modeling (Grusec, 1992). Modeling is a process how a person learns as a consequence of having watched another person perform (Cook, 1976). According to Albert Bandura, learning would be exceedingly laborious, not to mention hazardous, if people had to rely solely on the effects of others, then the effects of their own actions to inform them what to do (Cook, 1976). Bandura believed that people heavily relied on actions of others and typically blamed another for that learned
Zastrow, C., & Kirst-Ashman, K. K. (2013). Understanding human behavior and the social environment. Australia: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
then replicating the behavior that was observed. Observational learning is an important area inthe field of psychology because according to www.ncbi.nlm.nin.gov research in observational learning represents a critical development in the history of psychology. There are many learningtheories such as classical conditioning and operant conditioning which emphasize how direct experiences, reinforcements, and punishment lead to learning, but most learning happens indirectly by watching and imitating others. Observational learning is also referred to as shaping, modeling,
Since very early childhood, children are encouraged to socialize with other people to be able to learn all kinds of different skills. They start socializing with their parents to learn all the basic things such as learning to walk and talk and then move on to socialize with different family members and friends to learn how to have better social skills. As they grow up they learn how to do things by watching the people around them who influence them the most and then they proceed to try and mimic what they see. Albert Bandura called this the Social Learning Theory, saying that people learn how to do things by observing others. As the child grow, it learns what is right from wrong, but what happens when the child starts going to school and learning
Akers and Sellers (2013) has stated that social learning theory is an expanded theory of differential association processes and improves it with differential reinforcement and other principles of the behavior theory. They added classical conditioning (the sharpening of involuntary reflex behavior); discriminative stimuli (internal stimuli that lead to signals for behavior); schedules of reinforcement (rewards and punishment ratio following behavioral feedback); and other theories of behavior (Akers & Sellers, 2013).
The successful application of these theories have been very interdisciplinary in their use, being applicable in the development of disorders and even calculating spending patterns across social groups. Behaviorism and social learning have evolved beyond the original use of solely educational purposes. However, the effectiveness of the behaviorism theory has come into question as an educational approach., L’Ecuyer (2014) explains that the behaviorism approach, “emphasizes the accumulation of information (knowledge), on external behaviors (skills and mechanical habits) and their emotional and physical reactions in given situations, rather than on the person’s internal mental states, such as intentionality, which are much more complex (p.2). The article questions the modern effectiveness of the behaviorism approach on children. I have found that the theory of social learning when paired with the behaviorism theory is still very useful in education, even with the influx of modern technologies. At the very core, behaviorism, both classical and, seeks to explain why humans react to certain stimuli. Operant is more used in socially especially in child rearing, how to effectively discipline and child via reinforcement of positive behaviors or corporal punishment for negative behaviors is still a highly debated topic. Social learning can also heavily influence