If one is forced to act stupid while dealing with lower life forms, one may encounter barriers such as cruelty and insensitivity. Yet these are all true, there are still many advantages to stupidity. The first advantage is very easy to understand. Stupid people are never asked to do a lot. Many have noticed that people tend to steer away from someone they feel may be stupid.
The first case make it on purpose. Some people work done well, but there are ethical issues, such as greedy, selfish, and so on. Such a person easily tempted and make mistakes. The second is inadvertently made a mistake. Some people 's character is very good, but is careless at work, or poor memory and so on.
Their tendency is more optimistic in most of circumstances (Rosenberg, 1979) and when they are facing complicated situations, self-confidence plays an important role in supporting their decisions (Bearden et al, 2001). The characteristics of self-confidence indicated by White (2009) are trusted in positive accomplishment (self-assertion and optimism), persistence (endurance, flexibility, goal setting and anticipation) and self-awareness (judgment, intrinsic part and worries). On the other hand, the low level of self-confidence will make people feel pessimistic and less self-respect, they can only view their inappropriateness, imperfection and valuelessness (Rosenberg, 1979). Some researchers determine the determinants of self-confidence as precise knowledge and self-efficacy (De Cremer & Van Hiel; 2008). Self-confidence is not an inborn attribute, it can be shaped and progressed through the experiences of figuring out how to encounter with the
Not only do people get useful information from smiles, they also use this knowledge to direct their own behaviour. Duchenne smiles than those bearing false grins. “Duchenne smiles are a signal of cooperation, altruism. Non-Duchenne smiling isn't necessarily bad but it’s not a great signal. Socially rejected people should be looking for the best signal, and Duchenne genuine smiles offers it to them.
So the feeling that is considered to be less acceptable than envy might be a harmful feeling to experience. While reading an article written by Richard Smith about feeling happy when someone has made a mistake, he concludes that “when the other side stumbles-- be it a political party or a sports team-- it’s natural to feel good”. One of the facts he writes in his article is that we gain from others misfortunes. We might gain ahead in a competition or we might gain an e... ... middle of paper ... ...sly is a stronger emotion than sympathy. My results also say that feeling a little happy when another person messes up is not a bad thing to feel.
“A good will is not good because of what it effects or accomplishes—because of its fitness for attaining some proposed end: it is good through its willing alone—that is, good in itself” (Page 62). What I enjoy most about his discussion within good will is that it can go with everyday life. Although aspects of everyday life may be considered good in one individual’s eyes it does not mean that it is necessarily good for them or for anyone for that matter. Once you look further into something you realize that it comes out to be inferior. For example, the idea of wealth is great and if used correctly it can take people above and beyond in life allowing them to be successful but at the same time if wealth is in the wrong hands it can become corrupt and no longer a benefit to human society.
They are just as valuable as positive emotions, if not more valuable. If a person is too trusting, it can lead to them being stuck in dangerous situations. Negative emotions also cause slower processing, which allows the mind to pay more attention to the faint aspects of any given situation. Coauthors of the article “A Balanced Psychology and a Full Life,” Martin E.P. Seligman, Acacia C. Parks, and Tracy Steen, state, “Even if we were asymptotically successful at removing depression, anxiety, and anger, that would not result in happiness” (Seligman etal.
The nonmoral virtues generally are considered as contributing to the moral life but also as more easily expropriated for immoral purposes. Even though most of the virtue systems don't deny that there are princip... ... middle of paper ... ...ion of correct action. Virtue theorists emphasise the admitted difficulties of employing these formulae together with the suggestion that we ought to abandon them in favour of their alternative systems. We ought instead, we are told, to concentrate on the kinds of persons we ought to be, rather than the particular actions we should take. Since persons of appropriate moral character do good deeds, we would save ourselves the headaches of having to employ complicated theories especially if those theories do not often offer us very convincing results.