Adverse Events Persuasive System: The Adverse Event Surveillance System

The adverse events surveillance system

This is a type of surveillance system, which focuses on the safety on the patient regarding the use of drugs. It is controlled and operated by the food and drug administration. The adverse events surveillance system is purposed to collect information regarding the unintended effects of approved drugs and other therapeutics. Each country has a system in which reporting is done and delivered to the relevant agencies until it reaches the FDA offices. The reports for AERS are voluntary and are sourced from healthcare providers who notice the adverse events in the course of their jobs. They include nurses, physicians, pharmacists and other public members like patients, care takers and lawyers. The product manufacturer

In the United States, the laboratories are able to participate in the National salmonella surveillance system, by means of electronic reporting of isolates of Salmonella. In the year 2006, there were over 40,000 isolates from the United States being reported through the system. The laboratory stereotyping reveals information that could be used to link cases to a common source. The tool is crucial for analyzing outbreaks of diseases. The pulse net is another important laboratory system. It is used to monitor food borne disease outbreaks. It enables the labs across the country to compare the pulsed-field get electrophoresis, characteristics of the bacteria sourced from the infected person, and to be able to determine if they are similar. This decreases the time required to identify disease outbreaks by geographical regions. It is well in line with public health initiatives which looks to ensure disease prevention, and also prevention of disease spread through quick counter

Why or why not?

It is reasonable. It is only through statistics that the bigger picture can be clear and conclusive decisions made. For instance, the progress towards the eradication of polio, was under surveillance. The information from the surveillance data allowed us to see the rapid decline in the cases of polio in the U.S after the inactivated polio vaccine was launched. This observation enabled other countries to institute intensive vaccination programs in areas where polio could still be a problem. So, is statistics are this reliable, why not.

In your opinion, how do you feel the U.S. can improve its health statistics data collection systems?

The United States needs to integrate the health statistic from other countries due to high number of immigrants. This could be key in prevention of diseases from outside its boundaries. In addition, the country needs to educate the public more on the importance of the health statistics they go gathering so that the people can be sensitized and be enthusiastic in providing such information. Very severe punishment should be outlined for those compromising the confidentiality of the data