Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Research essay on single sex education
Co education vs single sex education
Single-sex education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Research essay on single sex education
Which is better – co-educational or single-sex education?
Ever since the co-educational system was introduced in the 19th century, single-sex education has been gradually conceived as an outdated system. However, over the last few decades, the rising reputation of sex-segregation within the academic field has introduced a highly controversial debate between single-sex and co-educational systems. This essay seeks to demonstrate that mixed-gender education is a highly suitable system for the pursuit of academic and social success. It will firstly introduce a critical approach towards both educational programmes, considering the main advantages that make worth studying in a co-educational system.
The fact of establishing a single-sex educational
…show more content…
Nonetheless, it could be argued that education does not, or theoretically should not, involve a socialising aspect, as it should merely provide beneficial academic outcomes. Admittedly then, evolving social relationships between pupils from different genders, could lead to a higher level of distraction, such as sexual attractiveness becoming a preoccupation which remains frequent throughout adolescent students (Kristin S. Caplice, 1994). This could result in an increasing rate of academic underperformance, thus providing a lack of preparation when developing students’ future …show more content…
Therefore, pupils should not be raised through gender-distinction, by conceiving men and women as opposite poles, but following a co-educational system by grouping them together. This would encourage the rise of beneficial values, such as diversity and tolerance not only over sex, but also over ethnicity and ideological beliefs. Hence, the mixed-gender programme should be vital for educational institutions as it undoubtedly provides long-term success by decreasing social stereotyping and getting future generations familiarised with equality and receptiveness towards
It seems that single-sex education perpetuates gender stereotypes and promotes gender bias among students (Taylor). Gender-separate education requires schools and teachers to create gender-oriented courses, facilities, and learning environment. As a result, sing-sex schools exacerbate sexist attitudes and “feelings of superiority toward women” (Guarisco). It is fair to argue that the best way to achieve gender equality is to promote rather than eliminate interaction among girls and boys. However, girls in the sex-mixed class receive less attention from teachers than boys, which may lead to gender bias. More precisely, boys always have disciplinary issues, such as interruption; teachers have to pay more attention to boys’ behaviors in order to proceed the lecture more smoothly. Girls may feel less important and supportive in male-dominated classes; boys may think that males are smarter and far superior than females. Single-sex schools can address both girls’ and boys’ issues of gender stereotypes directly and accordingly. Male students may be freer to engage in some activities they have not considered before in mixed schools. For example, boys feel pressure to follow some non-macho interests when girls stay around them; however, the all-boys schools eliminate their pressure toward gender stereotyping to pursue music, dance, and drawing. Single-sex schools would help boys explore and develop themselves. Also, girls in sex-separate schools show more confidence and power (Guarisco). They could receive full attention from teachers and express their opinions in science classes without worrying about the boys’ banter. They may realize that they are as important as boys. Hence, both girls and boys can be free from gender stereotypes and benefit from a same-sex learning
It is an area of diversity and difference with minimal awareness and often is deeply ingrained within the way educators treat girls and boys and too what they expect from them. Often unbeknown, educators assign tasks to their students according to their gender, for example, boys being asked to carry heavy sports equipment and girls being asked to tidy the chairs (National Union of Teachers, 2013, p. 6). In conjunction to this often-unintended stereotypical behaviour, educators also can habitually speak to girls and boys differently by altering their dialogue and the tone of the language (National Union of Teachers, 2013, p. 6). These behaviours can unknowingly contribute to the segregation of genders and negatively reinforce gender expectations. The educator who actively promotes gender equality demonstrates an understanding of diversity and difference. These educators will break down and challenge their students’ assumptions and objections of gender expectations. On top of this, educators should adopt a language code that does not discriminate nor highlight differences between genders. Ultimately, an educator with an understanding of diversity and difference will take the views of sex-role socialisation theory and post-structuralist feminists which both accept and view each child’s’ behaviour as individual (MacNaughton,
Education was sex segregated for hundreds of years. Men and women went to different schools or were physically and academically separated into “coeducational” schools. Males and females had separate classrooms, separate entrances, separate academic subjects, and separate expectations. Women were only taught the social graces and morals, and teaching women academic subjects was considered a waste of time.
Sending a child to a gender based school, is a very big decision to make. The decision is so big, that looking at what research has to say about the topic could alter one’s decision to send their child to a gender based school. “Educators must apply different approaches in teaching make, and female students” (Gurian). This is said by Gurian, because he also believes that boys and girls learn differently. “Social pressures can be gentler and your child can learn at his own pace” (Kennedy).
When students attend single-sex schools, it does not affect their perceptions of their own academic abilities -- like this type of education is said to do. Learning in an environment with all students around you being those of the same gender can often give students non-realistic perceptions of what college and the “real world” will be like. They can become too comfortable with learning just in this way and that will be a setback for these students in the long run. Naomi Thiers says, “Some people believe it's better for students to learn in mixed groups that are more reflective of society — and that any return to single-sex arrangements will lead to the stereotyping of students of both sexes.” Students are able to attend single-sex colleges, but there are only a small amount of those type of schools throughout the United States. Learning in a setting with the oppos...
The teacher tossed a Styrofoam basketball to the outstretched arms of a fifth grade boy. Catching the ball was the incentive for the boys to point out missing conventions in a paragraph. The teacher projected a paragraph on the board with omitted punctuation for the students to add. The other boys in the class watched him as he went to the board to add the missing comma and then tossed the ball back to the teacher. A few seconds later, other arms shot up in the air to point out other missing conventions (Stotsky). A simple incentive of competition for the boys made them enjoy learning and actually got them to participate in class. Although single-sex classrooms can develop stereotypes for both genders, separating boys and girls can be beneficial for the students. Single-sex classes are more effective because they raise test scores, create fewer distractions, and make kids interested in school.
Finally, there is no one sex school is going to be right for every student. There are many advantages and disadvantages mentioned in that essay before. But it's thought all over the world that the coeducation is preferred worldwide. About 90 % of schools all over the world are stuck to co-education. Mixed-sex education has achieved higher success rate. They also graduate students who are settled emotionally and able to deal with the real society. "There are not any dominant blessings for single-sex schools on academic grounds. Studies all over the world have failed to expose any major variations.'' - Academician Alan Smothers, director of education and employment analysis at the University of Buckingham 2011.
The single-sex format creates opportunities that do not exist in the coed classroom. (Edison 1) Researchers are unaware that both genders brains function differently. This lack of knowledge may be why the real truth about single-sex education being more efficient than co-ed education has not been discovered. Some say single-sex education may be the key for a brighter generation. It shows to improve test score dramatically. The number of public schools experimenting with single sex classes is now reported to be more than 350. (Silva 130) Some research also shows that single-sex classes have a more welcoming atmosphere. Single-sex education improves grades while coed educations keep an average pace.
From the academic perspective, experts suppose that in mixed sex-education, there is an academic competition among the g...
The first all female schools began in the early 1800’s. These academies favored more traditional gender roles, women being the home makers and the men being the bread winners. The first generation of educated women was the result of single-sex colleges in 1873. Wendy Kaminer, an investigative journalist, states that “single-sex education was not exactly a choice; it was a cultural mandate at a time when sexual segregation was considered only natural” (1). Women of this time were technically not allowed to attend school with males. Feminists of this time worked hard to integrate the school system and by the early 1900’s, single sex classrooms were a thing of the past. In 1910, twenty-seven percent of colleges were for men only, fifteen percent were for women only and the remainders were coed. Today, women outnumber men among college graduates (Kaminer 1). After all the hard work of early feminists, there are thousands of people today who advocate bringing back the single sex classroom.
Some people think that single sex schools are good because girls and boys feel free to talk, ask and raise their hands without being made fun of, "The theoretical approach termed 'girl power' argues that girls lag behind boys in some subject in co-ed classrooms." (predit, 2014). However, Single sex schools are very bad because it affects children attitude, they will find difficulty in communicating with their colleagues in college as they were secluded and didn't interact with other sex in school. Boys and girls should know from a young age how to deal with the opposite sex, instead of facing that when they become adults, and don't have experience on what to do. Students in single-sex classrooms will one day live and work side-by-side with members of the opposite sex .Educating students in single-sex schools restrains their chance to work helpfully and cooperate effectively with parts of the inverse sex. "It is not long before the youth of today will be the parents, co-workers and leaders of tomorrow" (strauss, 2012). "Anything we organize along any variable, if we're saying boys he...
Education has been an important factor of all of our lives for an exceptional amount of time, but unfortunately, America has been falling behind from other nations in their education system compared to other nations (Pahlke 444). Almost all of our public schools in our country are coeducational and only handful of them are single-sex educational schools. Single-sex education should be taken into high consideration for most students to attend because of the benefits they might gain from them. It is important to look at all possible ways to try and better our education system for the benefit of the children and teenagers attending school. The most important years of schooling that provide a solid background for all students would be kindergarten through senior year of high school. It provides the basic knowledge and problem solving skills that will be utilized for most of our lives. In order to ensure that the children and teenagers today are provided with the best quality of education, we want to make sure they are engaged and focused in school and single-sex schools will be able to make that possible for students. Not only will it help our students remain focused in the classroom, it will also provide a comfortable environment for them in which they can enable themselves to learn.
This problem occurs in schools everywhere and is starting to become more evident in today's society. The problem is that boys and girls learning potential are not being reached when put into the same teaching atmosphere. Girls seem to be out smarting boys in many classes. While boys excel in math and sciences and girls seem to be better in English. The styles in which boys and girls feel comfortable with are extremely different. The learning styles of girls usually contain socializing and context. For instance, most girls like to talk in small groups about the current discussion. They also like hands on activities or real life situations to compare things to. Boys are confrontational and formal. They need to be challenged by their teachers to help motivate them to become better students and be prepared. In contrast girls do not like to be confronted by teachers who are asking for an immediate answers. In most cases, girls seem to be more reserved and modest than boys about their intelligence ("What are someÉ) are. Their differences may not seem evident but make a difference to reaching their highest learning potential.
How does gender segregation effect students in school? Many countries believe that separating genders in schools helps to make a better atmosphere and better academically. There are many advantages have been shown for single-sex schooling. It has been shown that the differences of the performance in school subjects can differ from boys to girls, many supporters believe that gender segregation in education helps increase the academic interests. Teachers have been attending training to learn how to teach girls and boy. Girls and boys supposed naturally different ways of learning (Gurian, Stevens, & Daniels, 2009). Many public schools support the segregation in education in the other hand there are some private schools support the gender
According to World Association for Sexual Health, "to achieve sexual health, all individuals, including youth, must have access to comprehensive sexuality education and sexual health information and services throughout the life cycle" (Sexual Health for the Millennium 4). In the fifteenth century, scientists and educators raised the issue of sex education of children and adolescents. This topic particularly was discussed after the sexual revolution that occurred in the past century, when there were the first attempts to introduce sex education courses first as electives, and then as a mandatory class. Sex education should be taught in schools as a compulsory subject in order to develop knowledge about puberty as well as to prevent unintended pregnancies and sexually transmitted infections.