National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA). N.p., n.d. Web. 11 Nov. 2013. . (tags: none | edit tags) staff, Mayo.
(2005) Stuck On You: Magnetic Therapy Supplier. http://www.stuckonyou.com (Accessed 15th May 2005). No Author. No Date. Magnetic Therapy History.
The actual definition of adoption is the act or fact of adopting or being adopted. Although interracial adoption is on the up rise it brings other people to wonder if it’s the right thing to do as in if its right to bring a colored child into a white house hold, because the impact on the child that is being adopted, it is an opportunity for the child to not be a quitter or give up because no one loved them, love has no color and that a child belongs to a family that will love them no matter what, for the reason being because a child is a different color than the adoptive parents it should not matter if they are different colors than each other as long as you love them and show them that someone cares about them and that they belong here with people who does love them . For many years children have been given up for adoption or put into foster homes and some children who are put there might be lucky enough to get chosen to be adopted. Well there is an issue with that growing upon us and that is interracial adoption. Being a child who is in foster homes are generally hard to get adopted but it is even harder for an African American male.
That meaning you would not know any of your history. So you can see that although you're giving the child up, does not mean you don't love them it shows that you want to give your baby a better life since you were not able to give them that. Instead of abortion you put it up for adoption but still wanted be apart of your baby’s life, so you should choose Open Adoption for two main reasons. First, because you loved your child so much that you wanted to give them a better life and wanted to be there for them. But most importantly, when adoptive parents and birth parents keep in contact with each other the child will see that they weren't abandoned and they will feel loved instead of feeling worthless.
It seems reasonable to assume that homosexual individuals should be able to adopt children in order to put the many children stuck in foster care into loving homes. However, there is an argument against letting homosexual individuals and couples adopt. It is said that same-sex couples should not adopt because there must be two roles for parents in a family: “...the mother [who is] better equipped to pass on nurturing skills and the father [who is] more qualified to teach leadership” (Wilson). There is no need for a parent who is only nurturing/a leader; one parent can possess both of these skills, which happens frequently. If a homosexual couple cannot adopt, should a single-mother not be allowed to raise a child due to lack of a father-figure in the household?
In addition, the government has to realize that religion should not play a role in whether or not gays should be able to adopt as a couple. People always say they feel for children and wish they could help. Well here is that opportunity! These children need a loving home, and if a gay or lesbian couple can provide that, why not let them. I agree that religion plays an import part in everyday life, but that alone does not provide security for those in foster care like a family would.