Adam Smith Research Paper
analytical Essay
469 words
Another predominant figure of the period of enlightenment was Adam Smith. Born in
Kirkcaldy, Scotland to Adam Smith, his father by the same name, and Margaret Douglas, in June of 1723, Smith enjoyed the benefits of what could be considered a comfortable childhood.6 The death of his father before his birth had little effect on his upbringing or his philosophy. This was because his father had the resources to financially support his family, even in the case of a tragic event such as the one which had occurred. Overall, Smith’s familial relations had little effect on his beliefs as a philosopher.
Like Rousseau's, Smith’s ideas come from his own personal experiences within his environment. Unlike Rousseau's, Smith’s ideas are not based on family
…show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Explains that adam smith was a predominant figure of the period of enlightenment. his father's death had little effect on his upbringing or philosophy.
- Explains that smith's ideas are based on his personal experiences within hisenvironment, and not on family relationships.
- Explains that many of smith's ideas are centred around economics, focusing on ideas such as free trade and supply and demand.
- Analyzes how adam smith's theories are applicable to the modern day because they set the groundwork for what would eventually become the economic system for many countries around the world.
These ideas are essentially the basis of capitalism, providing an open market to the people with little to no government regulation. Smith believed that economic competition should regulate the economy through the amount of an item (supply) and the necessity of said item (demand). In essence, Smith believed in an economic system in which power was given to the individual, rather than the group.
Adam Smith’s theories are applicable to the modern day because of the fact that they set the groundwork for what would eventually become the economic system for many countries around the world. In addition to this, the existence of capitalism spurred the values of democracy in a sense that the two ideas (capitalism and democracy) go hand in hand, both providing freedom with regards to a certain facet of life. Smith’s capitalist ideals are reflected in the way the modern economy works, and the overall dominance the system has over other systems of economics. His theories are especially prevalent today as opposed to during the 20th century, when the rise of communism threatened to overtake the capitalist system of economics.8 In sum, Adam Smith’s theories and beliefs are prevalent within society today because they essentially became the norm with regards to economics and governance around the world. This is evident in the fact that even traditionally communist countries, such as Russia and China, have taken on a capitalist approach with regards to their
Related
- explanatory
- analytical
- argumentative
- Adam Smith: The Father Of Modern Economicsexplanatory essayAnyone studying or working in economics today owes a debt of gratitude to Adam Smith, who is considered by many to be the father of modern economics. Smith was a moral philosopher of Scottish ancestry who lived and wrote during the Scottish Enlightenment and the Industrial Revolution. Published in 1776, his work An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations decried government intervention in the economy and provided a blueprint for free markets and free trade. Thus began modern economics.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that anyone studying or working in economics today owes a debt of gratitude to adam smith, who is considered by many to be the father of modern economy.
- Explains that adam smith was born in 1723 in kirkcaldy, fife, scotland. his father was a lawyer and comptroller of customs who died about two months after his son's birth.
- Explains that adam smith's an inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations had an immediate impact on british economic policy.
- Explains that smith argued that people are more productive when they specialize in a single task. this produces more of what they’re good at, creating surplus goods.
- Explains that the second law is self-interested behavior, which states that people are guided by an invisible hand toward their own interests.
- Describes how adam smith studied under francis hutcheson, a philosopher and presbyterian minister, at glasgow university.
- Analyzes how the union with britain in 1707 meant the loss of home rule in scotland, but left behind civil law practitioners, presbyterian church leaders, and academics dedicated to a humanistic approach to education and politics.
- Explains that the publication of wealth of nations signaled the decline of mercantilism and marked the start of modern capitalism and economics.
- Explains that adam smith was appointed to the post of commissioner of customs in kirkcaldy in 1778. most of his economic theories have relevance to modern society, and are the foundation of market economics.
1645 wordsRead More - Industrial Revolution Seminar Questionsexplanatory essayAdam Smith's view was that a free market would help everyone, poor and rich alike. It would increase the production of goods so that more would be affordable to everyone. A growing economy would make capitalists invest in new ventures.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that rich landowners took over land previously owned by peasants and migrated to cities, which triggered the industrial revolution.
- Explains how the use of coal, which would power steam engines, as a source of energy greatly helped trigger the industrial revolution.
- Explains that britain had large supplies of coal to power steam engines, and iron to build machinery. trade from a growing overseas empire aided the growth of british economy and allowed the business class to gain capital.
- Explains that population explosion, agricultural changes, and the increasing demand for more workers led to urbanization, or the migration of people to cities.
- Explains that the industrial revolution was made possible by a revolution in agriculture, which improved farm productivity.
- Explains that utilitarians believed that the goal of society was to achieve the greatest amount of happiness for as many people as possible.
- Explains that marx viewed history as driven by economics, and that the proletariat would take over the means of production to set up a society in which wealth and power was equal.
1306 wordsRead More - Adam Smith Biographyexplanatory essayAdam Smith was born on July 5, 1723 in Kirkcaldy, Scotland. At the age of fourteen, Smith entered the University of Glasgow, where he studied moral philosophy under Francis Hutcheson. Here Smith developed his strong passion for liberty, reason, and free speech. In 1740 he was awarded the Snell Exhibition and entered Balliol College, Oxford. In 1746 Smith left Oxford. In 1748 Smith began delivering public lectures in Edinburgh under the patronage of the Lord Kames. In 1751 Smith Was appointed the Chair of Logic at University of Glasgow, the next year he was appointed the Chair of Moral Philosophy, which was the position of his old teacher Francis Hutcheson. In 1759 he published The Theory of Moral Sentiments, it was embodied several of his lectures from his roles at Glasgow. In 1762 the academic senate of the University of Glasgow conferred on Smith the title of Doctor of Laws (LL.D.). Smith subsequently resigned from his professorship and from 1764-66 traveled with his pupil, mostly in France. On returning home to Kirkcaldy Smith was elected fellow of the Royal Society of London and he devoted much of the next ten years to his magnum opus. The Wealth of Nations was published on March 9, 1776. It was written for the average educated individual of the 18th century rather than for specialists and mathematicians. There are three main concepts that Adam Smith expands upon in this work that forms the foundation of free market economics: division of labour, pursuit of self interest, and freedom of trade. As for Smith?s characteristics and personal views, not much is known beyond what can be deduced from his published works. Shortly before his death, Smith had nearly all his manuscripts destroyed. In his last years he seemed to have been planning two major treatises, one on the theory and history of law and one on the sciences and arts.
In this essay, the author
- Describes adam smith as an eccentric but benevolent intellectual, comically absent minded, with peculiar habits of speech.
369 wordsRead More - Compare And Contrast Adam Smith And Adrl Marxanalytical essayAdam Smith developed an economic system based upon private business, competition, and limited government involvement. He believed that an invisible hand would guide the market towards increased
In this essay, the author
- Explains that adam smith and karl marx had similar goals and beliefs, but differed in how to achieve an economy that worked for everyone.
- Analyzes how adam smith developed an economic system based on private business, competition, and limited government involvement. he believed that an invisible hand would guide the market towards increased productivity and lower prices.
- Analyzes smith's argument that greed and selfishness improve the standards of living and thus benefit society as a whole.
- Explains that marx believed capitalism was not the best way to achieve the goals of lesser poverty and the prevention of businesses becoming too large. the bourgeoisie participated in the exploitation of workers by increasing working hours and reducing wages.
- Compares marx and smith, two people with a common goal of reducing poverty, with completely different opinions on how to achieve it. smith believes in the power of the invisible hand to guide businesses to help the poor.
737 wordsRead More - The Wealth Of Nations By Adam Smith Analysisanalytical essayAdam Smith is notably known to be the father of modern economics, and many of his work have been implemented today. His major work was “An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations” where his economic views are seen. He was exceptionally known as a classical economist not only for his principles but for how he presented them. His anthropological principles for the distribution of labor and resources made him known as the “first economic historian” (Sociological Theory in the Classical Era, p. 66). In his famous work, The Wealth of Nations, mirrored the dawn of the industrial revolution occurring in Europe.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that adam smith was the father of modern economics. his major work was "an inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations" where his economic views are seen.
- Analyzes how adam smith defines annual labor as the fund that supplies the laborer with life's necessities. he argues that the division of labor should be observed greatly, even in primitive civilizations.
- Analyzes how smith articulated the benefits of the division of labor which spreads opulence to even the poor. smith developed the idea of trade and how it is part of human nature.
- Analyzes how david graeber discusses the barter myth and how it is a curious system in different parts of the world.
- Analyzes how david graeber's examples are quite different from adam smith’s where he displays interest for materialistic items.
983 wordsRead More - Adam Smith's Contributions to Modern Free Market Economicsargumentative essayNation Master, Initials. (2010). Encyclopedia > Adam Smith. Statemaster. Retrieved (2010, March 9) from http://www.statemaster.com/encyclopedia/Adam-Smith#_note-1
In this essay, the author
- Explains that adam smith was one of the main contributors to modern free market economics. his works provided systematic rationales in the subjects of capitalism, free markets, and limited government intervention.
- Defines laissez-faire as a doctrine opposing governmental interference in economic affairs beyond the minimum necessary for the maintenance of peace and property rights.
- Explains capitalism's emphasis on free-markets and property rights, leaving government out of the economy to promote social efficiency throughout the society.
- Concludes that adam smith changed the way the earth is today because of his ideas on free markets and his idea about the invisible hand. smith was not a pure capitalist in the modern sense.
- Explains smith, a., an inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations.
- Explains that adam smith was born in 1723, but his mother led him to his scholarly efforts. by 1740, smith had developed a passion for freedom in that personal freedom and liberty lead to the best possible outcome.
- Explains that smith's ideas were considered the groundwork for modern economics. smith attacked government interventions such as tariffs in the belief that they promote growth in infant industry.
- Analyzes how smith and the mercantilists differed in their market ideas. smith believed in a free-market system, whereas he preferred more government intervention.
- Explains that smith is a proponent of laissez-faire, but his ideas do not follow suit with the free-market economic philosophy.
- Opines that every tax should be planned so that it should take out and keep out of the pockets of people. smith recommends two types of taxes, luxury tax and taxes on rents.
- Explains that broadie, a., the cambridge companion to the scottish enlightenment. nation master, initials.
2262 wordsRead More - Television Pros And Cons Essayargumentative essayAdam Smith (1723 – 1790) is a Scottish moral philosopher who wrote many books including the ‘Wealth of Nations’ and the ‘Theory of Moral Sentiments’. The moral theory of Smith is derived from empiricists such as David Hume. Dr Edward W Younkins in his extract on ‘Adam Smith’s moral and economic system’ states that the book ‘Theory of Moral Sentiments’ presents and examination of the process by which the person judges himself and other people. In this book Smith states that there is more to life than economics and politics and that man should give due importance to moral sentiments and sympathetic feelings abandoning self centredness. In other words Smith is implying that man should live a virtuous life. Smith divides virtues in two levels:
In this essay, the author
- Compares adam smith's view of the human person with that of any other moral philosopher.
- States that adam smith's moral theory is derived from empiricists such as david hume. theory of moral sentiments examines the process by which the person judges himself and others.
- Explains that sympathy means compassion, pity, and joy. approval is a feeling when the person can project himself and sympathize with the act done.
- Explains that hume's problem comes to pass because he cannot find any impression of connection between cause and effect. necessary connection can be compared to smith’s line of thought.
- Analyzes how professor joe friggieri states that hume compares vices and virtues with sounds, colour, heat and cold in his book 'in-nisga tal-hsieb'.
- Explains that smith states that there are four virtues in one's life — justice, prudence, and benevolence. emotions are the basis of moral judgement implanted in man by a higher beneficial diety.
- Explains that david hume, a contemporary of adam smith, wrote 'a treatise of human nature', which will be used in this assignment.
1083 wordsRead More - The Humanistic Tradition By Gloria Fiero's Chapter Summaryanalytical essayIn the Humanistic Tradition the author, Gloria Fiero introduces Adam smith as a Scottish moral philosopher, pioneer of political economy, and a key figure in the Scottish Enlightenment. Smith also known as the Father of Political economy, is best known for one of his two classic works An Inquiry into the nature and causes of the Wealth of Nations. Fiero looks at Smith’s work because the division of labor is important. One thing Smith thinks is even more important for creating a wealthy nation, is to interact and have open trade with different countries. Fiero states,“It is necessary, though very slow and gradual, consequence of a certain propensity in human nature which has in view no such extensive utility; the propensity to truck, barter,
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how gloria fiero introduces adam smith as a scottish moral philosopher, pioneer of political economy, and key figure in the scottish enlightenment.
- Opines that trading is the key to modern wealth. to create a wealthy nation people must have open trade with other countries.
- Explains that capitalism is an economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.
- Analyzes how adam smith's wealth of nation review, written by donald white, focuses on labor and trade.
- Explains that smith doesn't think that free trade is a problem, stating that countries can trade with each other when they do not have the resources or capacity to satisfy their own needs and wants.
- Explains how smith makes it ideal for countries to interact and trade. trade means you get more direct workers into jobs in which they have a comparative advantage.
727 wordsRead More - Classical Economics vs. Keynesian Economicsanalytical essayClassical Economics is a theory that suggests by leaving the free market alone without human intervention; equilibrium will be obtained. This theory was the first school of thought for economists and one of the major theorists and founders of Classical Economics was Adam Smith. Smith stated, “By pursuing his own interest, he (man) frequently promotes that (good) of the society more effectually than when he really intends to promote it. I (Adam Smith) have never known much good done by those who affected to trade for the public good.”(Patil) Classical Economic theory assumes three basic ideas: Flexible Prices, Shay’s Law, and Savings-Investment equality. Flexible prices in Classical theory suggests prices will rise and fall as needed but is not always true, due to, the interference of government agencies including unions and laws. Smith stated in the Wealth of the Nation (1776), “Civil government, so far it is instituted for the security of property, is in reality instituted for the defense of the rich against the poor, or of those who have some property against those who have none at all.” (Patil) Shay’s Law implies supply creates its own demand and demand is not based on production or supply.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that their research of classical economics and keynesian economics has given them the opportunity to form an opinion on this highly debated topic in economics.
- Analyzes the differences between classical and keynesian economic theories.
- Explains that they believe in the keynesian theory before they knew it existed and recognize the importance of this kind of economics for america.
- Concludes that keynesian economics will continue because the graphs showed a great gain in economic growth. they hope that america never has another economic catastrophe.
- Analyzes batra, ravi, mccoach, and nikaido's "transition from the classical to the keynesian."
1187 wordsRead More - Comparing Adam Smith and Karl Marxanalytical essaySmith and Marx agree upon the importance of capitalism as unleashing productive powers. Capitalism is born out of the division of labour... that is, it is made possible by dividing jobs up into simple tasks as a way of increasing efficiency. By increasing efficiency, then everyone can produce more than they personally need. The extra produced can go towards the accumulation of capital, (machines, more land, more tools, etc) which will allow for even more increased efficiency and production. Both thought that this increased production was great. But Marx said that capitalism was only one stage... that every country must go through capitalism, to get that increased production, but that capitalism is unstable. It requires expanding markets and will end up creating a large gap between the wealthy and the poor, with more and more people becoming poor. Because of this instability, he thought that it would eventually collapse.
In this essay, the author
- Compares adam smith and karl marx on the importance of capitalism as unleashing productive powers.
- Explains that smith thinks that as everyone produces more, they have more to sell (exchange) and everyone will be happier.
- Explains that marx points out that the means of production are owned by only a small group of the population and most other people don't. the proletariat cannot sell their produce, only their labour-power.
- Argues that smith and marx agree that capitalism requires ever expanding markets. smith believes that jobs cannot be divided down too much unless the market continues to grow.
- Analyzes how smith and marx agree that if there are too many people and too little jobs, wages are lowered.
562 wordsRead More