A Rational Look at the Abortion Controversy
One of the most hotly contested issues inside and outside of biomedical ethics today is abortion. The discussion received a new impetus at the release of the controversial abortion drug RU-486, "a pill to increase access to abortions and let women get them privately from their own doctor instead of facing shouting protesters at clinics. "2 As is the case with all controversial issues, there are very passionate people on both sides of the fence. Unfortunately, a heated discussion on abortion can easily and quickly turn into a battle of rhetoric rather than a dialectic of reason.
Elizabeth Brundage’s The Doctor’s Wife is a novel focusing mainly on abortion and the moral implications that go along with the topic. In my opinion, Brundage captures the opinion of both the pro-life and pro-choice groups of people fairly accurately, and represents these opinions in the novel’s characters in a respectful manner. This novel delves into one of the more taboo topics that people tend to avoid when it comes to American politics.
The 2008 documentary entitled The Coat Hanger Project centers around reproductive justice and state laws enact during this time period. It presents compelling narratives and information of abortions pre and post Roe from a range of individuals including illegal abortion survivors, abortion providers, scholars, and activist. Although the film did a respectable job of bringing new information into view, it did not come without the creator’s pro-choice bias. It is painstakingly obvious from the lack of pro-life being represented that the filmmakers lead further towards the pro-choice argument. With the pro-life side of the argument absent from the film it corners the audience to believe that the only choice is pro-choice. However despite the
With all the hot debate going on in modern days, it would almost seem that talk about abortion has found its way into society’s controversies for millennia, but it wasn’t criminalized until the late 1880s, a time when the medical profession desired to gain more status and power (“Abortion”). Certainly being some of the more educated people at that time, especially educated men, they achieved that goal, creating a huge stigma surrounding abortion. It became illegal for
Rosenblatt, Roger. “How to End the Abortion War.” The New York Times Company, 1992. [Scholarly primary source; print; not used for evidence]
In the article “It’s a Child, Not a Choice”, published in February of 1992, author Diane Dew writes to persuade readers about the issue of pro life. Dew writes to women, pro choice and pro life activists in an effort to inflict a guilty conscience in the minds of those who select the choice of abortion. Her intent in writing this piece is to try to convince readers of the negative aspects and irrationality of following through with an abortion. To Dew, the issues of pro choice and pro life should no longer be debatable civil rights issues. Dew supports her convictions with coherent reasoning.
Lewis, Jone Johnson. "A history of the abortion controversy in the United States." Women's History. 2004. 23 Feb. 2005
Meredith Isaksen published “Late-Term Abortion Was the Right Choice for Me” in the New York Times the day after Donald Trump commented on late-term abortion in the third presidential debate. Her first person narrative gave readers a detailed account, effectively arguing the necessity for late-term abortions. The whole piece was centered around the idea that “our government has absolutely no place in the anguish which accompanies a late-term abortion, except to ensure that women and their families have the right to make their choice safely and privately” (8).
On Wednesday, March 3rd, the Supreme Court took under its wing the abortion case, Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt. The case regards the unsanitary environment of abortion clinics within the United States and orders these clinics to upheld the safety and health standards in order to keep their doors open. Unsatisfactory conditions have resulted in numerous deaths of women from infections, ruptures, and perforated bowels in various clinics. The accusatory tone of the article adds to the enraged mood as blame is put unto sketchy doctors - described as “incompetent…inept, [and] unscrupulous” ( paragraph 3) - and their negligence during operations.
3). There were rogue “physicians” performing abortions in unapproved offices (back ally offices) rather than medical offices which led to unsanitary and unhealthy conditions. Roe v. Wade court decision changed the perception of abortion, giving the “right” to the mother to terminate a pregnancy deeming it was her body and her decision. This also generated a new financial aspect for medical doctors willing to perform these procedures. However, this publicity also brought to light the casualness society took with human life and rights to the unborn. The groundbreaking court ruling legalizing abortion did not immediately change the number of abortions being performed, however, it did regulate the procedure and provide guidelines for the procedure. In the decades since Roe v. Wade, there has been legislation that has affected the availability and legality of abortion procedures. This paper will review some of the legislation and the affects it has had on societal views, medical practice, and availability to expectant