Abortion Argument Analysis
analytical Essay
488 words
Abortion has been one of the most controversial and sensitive issues around the world. A large number of people have discussed for years whether abortions are acceptable and legal or not. Some people think women should have the right to choose an abortion, whereas, other people think that undergoing an abortion has no difference like killing a person. This essay compares underlying values driving the arguments in the Marquis’s article “Why Abortion Is Immoral,” Peter K. McInerney’s article “Does a Fetus Already Have a Future-Like-Ours?” and Tim Anderson’s article “The Right to Safe and Legal Abortion”. According to Marquis, abortion is immoral since it involves the killing of the fetus and “the loss of the future to a standard fetus” (194). Abortion can only be justified in some circumstances, for example, the life of the pregnant woman is in danger, or “the loss consequent on failing to abort would be at least as great”(Marquis 194). In order to strongly support the statement that killing a fetus is seriously wrong, Marquis offers two accounts as demonstration. One is …show more content…
In this essay, the author
- Explains that abortion has been one of the most controversial and sensitive issues around the world. people have debated for years whether abortions are acceptable and legal or not.
- Compares underlying values driving the arguments in the marquis' article "why abortion is immoral," peter k. mcinerney's article, "does a fetus already have a future-like-ours?" and tim anderson'
- Analyzes marquis' argument that abortion is immoral since it involves the killing of the fetus and the loss of future.
- Argues that while fetuses aren't able to value their futures, it's important to point out that other people might notice a great value in their life. marquis refutes the statement of pro-abortion that an entity cannot control and decide the right to life unless it desires to continue their lives.
To refute the statement of pro-abortion that an entity cannot control and decide the right to life unless it has the ability to desire to continue their lives, Marquis claims that a fetus fails to care about or take an interest in something does not mean that the fetus cannot have a right to it (Marquis199). Instead, the fetus can and should have the right to it because they have potential interest in it, furthermore, killing is wrong and fetus can be victims since “their lives are deliberately terminated,” and also “they are deprived of their futures of value and their prospects” (Marquis
Let Our AI Magic Supercharge Your Grades!
Related
- opinion
- analytical
- Arguments Against Abortion Deontology Essayopinion essayThe issue that this essay is dedicated to assist to this never ending battle of abortion. This essay will be written from the point of a pro-abortion utilitarian however I must also consider the argument against abortion to get a full understanding of how serious this issue is, the against argument is of a deontological stand-point. First while I argue that abortion is not impermissible, I do not argue that I is always permissible. It allows for and supports our sense, for an example, that Ms Judith Jarvis Thompson states in her A Defence of Abortion, “a sick and frightened teenaged school girl who is pregnant due to being raped may choose abortion and it should be morally permissible however choosing to terminate your pregnancy when you are
In this essay, the author
- Explains that the essay is a pro-abortion utilitarian, but the argument against abortion is deontological. it calls for the maximization of goodness in society, not merely the good of one person.
- Explains that abortion is the removal of the foetus from the uterus before it has reached the stage of viability.
- Opines that utilitarianism should be used to answer questions about the ethics of abortion. they argue that parents have a duty to care for their child and not abort it.
- Concludes that if we use utilitarianism to answer questions about abortion ethics, we still need to decide whether the greatest good includes the good of the foetus.
- Explains that there are situations "for" and "against" abortion. the case must be correctly analysed by both patient and physician and also by a bioethicist.
835 wordsRead More - Marquis Vs. Marquis: The Morality Of Abortionanalytical essayMarquis stresses the concept that abortion is equal to that of killing a fully adult human. He illustrates that because of the mindset that to abort a fetus, except in special scenarios, is a serious moral wrong. Marquis introduces the idea of the morality of abortion with identifying that typical arguments by anti-abortionists and pro-choice believers are weak and stubborn. Marquis explains that anti-abortionists praise the notion that fetuses exhibit adult behaviors, and the other hand, pro-choice argues that fetuses lack sorts of features that are necessary to be considered for insertion in moral society. (Insert Source Here) Both sides putting immense effort to argue in favor of an opinion that will clarify killing or murder so that It
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how marquis stresses the concept that abortion is equal to killing a fully adult human. he argues that typical arguments by anti-abortionists and pro-choice believers are weak and stubborn.
- Explains immanuel kant's argument that one woman would have to will all women to have an abortion, which makes abortion irrational and immoral.
- Analyzes how marquis adopts a strategy to recognize why murdering an adult human is morally wrong, and to adapt it to the argument of abortion.
- Explains that marquis considers competing arguments that attempt to defend murder and to prevail abortion as not presumptively incorrect.
799 wordsRead More - Exploring the Abortion Issueanalytical essayWhen it comes to abortion one can not state that there is simply a conflict between a woman’s right to privacy/autonomy of her body (i.e. the right to choose) and the right to life (particularly the right of the fetus to be born). It is also not adequate to claim that the alternating theories of when life is created is at the core of the conflict over abortion, because the definition of the creation of life does not determine when and why the state will protect the right of the life of the fetus. The overlying issue is a combination of both claims. By carefully analyzing the moral and empirical claims surrounding the abortion issue, we believe that the best position for our candidate is one of pro-choice with some restrictions.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that pro-life groups include the republican party, the catholic church, and operation rescue.
- Explains that abortion is a complex issue where individual circumstances have huge impacts on personal positions. pro-choice beliefs were strongly endorsed by the women's movement.
- Explains that the u.s., canada, greenland, australia, china, mozambique, a few countries in europe and elsewhere have the most overall liberal abortion restrictions.
- Explains luker, kristin, "motherhood and morality in america." university of california press, 1984.
- Analyzes scott, jacqueline, and schuman's "attitude strength and social action in the abortion dispute."
- Explains wang, guang-zhen, and reiss' hypotheses on the social and cultural determinants of attitudes towards abortion.
- Argues that the best position for our candidate is one of pro-choice with some restrictions.
- Analyzes how people's decision to support abortion are influenced by the circumstances of the pregnancy, and limited by personal reservations about motivations to end a pregnancy.
- Opines that the majority of americans think that abortion should be a legal option despite the small chance of medical complications in legal abortions.
- Cites cates jr., willard, grimes, and schulz. the public health impact of legal abortion: 30 years later.
- Analyzes how grimes, david a., and gratz, roberta brande. "april 1973: never again," published in the journal of the american medical association.
- States rosenbaum, stuart, "abortion, the constitution, and metaphysics." journal of church and state vol 43, no 4.
- Cites sprang, m. leroy, and mark g. neerhof's "rationale for banning abortions late in pregnancy."
3764 wordsRead More - Don Marquis: Why Abortion Is Imoral?analytical essayMarquis acknowledges that fetuses don’t have the capacity for self-conscious awareness, but believes that despite their lack of awareness they still should be given a right to life. He goes on to make the argument that abortion can be on the same level as the murder of an adult human. And, Marquis explains that people have reservations against murder because it denies them the right to their future experiences, projects, activities, and enjoyments. While he still believes abortion to be immoral, he does condone abortion under certain circumstances, those circumstances being when the loss would be equal, such as when the mother’s life is at risk because then the mother wouldn’t be allowed the same right to future experiences as the fetus otherwise. An easy objection to make to Marquis statement is that the value of one’s future is reliant on someone’s ability to be cognizant of their future, and as fetuses aren’t it would make abortion morally permissible. To that point Marquis responds that a fetus has the potential to become self-conscious. And according to him, because fetuses have the potential to personhood makes abortion morally
In this essay, the author
- Explains that abortion is the intentional termination of pregnancy. there are many different views on abortion and the question of its morality, though there are three philosophers who eloquently express those views.
- Analyzes don marquis' 1989 essay, "why abortion is immoral." he argues that fetuses don't have the capacity for self-conscious awareness, but should be given a right to life.
- Analyzes how judith jarvis thomson's "a defence of abortion" makes the argument that abortion shouldn't be prohibited despite the fetus' right to life.
- Analyzes mary ann warren's argument that fetuses don't have a significant right to life. she rejects traditional anti-abortion arguments as they contain faulty equivocations and lack clear distinction.
- Opines that they align more with warren, though they understand where thomson is coming from. they believe that early on in a fetus' development, cognizance is required to fully be human.
994 wordsRead More - Abortionanalytical essayAbortion has been one of the topics of hot debate for the last three decades in our nation. Since the Roe v/s Wade decision in 1973, some Americans feel the need to ponder whether aborting fetuses is a moral action. On the one hand, some people feel that abortion should be legal because a woman has a right to choose whether she wants to continue a pregnancy or not. It's her body. On the other hand, some feel that fetuses have no advocates and deserve a right to live, so it is immoral to abandon their rights and kill them. This issue is not only at the center of political debate, but philosophical debate as well. In this paper, I will examine and critique Mary Anne Warren's On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion, where she examines the moral humanity of the fetus and its right to life.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how warren uses thomson's paper, a defense of abortion, to rationalize her idea that abortion is morally permissible, even if a fetus has moral rights.
- Opines that the existence of such a right would be murder unless we were able to produce evidence.
- Opines that mary anne warren has written a very detailed and understandable article, but her claims aren't consistent or convincing and may seem heartless.
- Analyzes mary anne warren's on the moral and legal status of abortion, which examines the moral humanity of the fetus and its right to life.
- Argues that warren's article attempts to define what a 'person' is, to follow through with her claim.
1148 wordsRead More - Why abortion is immoralanalytical essayFrom this point, Marquis attempts to outline common objections to anti-abortionism, and give replies in which may better support his view, by characterizing and defining situations which are commonly brought up in such arguments. Firstly, an anti-abortionist will hold that it is “prima facie seriously wrong to end the life of a baby”, which is a generally obvious position. A pro-choicer would typically respond that it is only seriously wrong to take the life of another member of the human society, which refers to active members and social beings in a community. This leads to a point where it is commonly seen that anti-abortionists hold too narrow of a principle, while pro-choice views are too broad. Thus, it stands that both parties must further elaborate to support their claims. Furthermore, an anti-abortionist will claim, “it is prima facie seriously wrong to end the life of a human being”. However, this do...
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes how don marquis' essay attempts to undermine general beliefs that anti-abortionist views are simply based on irrational religious or other beliefs.
- Analyzes how marquis attempts to outline common objections to anti-abortionism by characterizing and defining situations which are commonly brought up in such arguments.
- Analyzes feinberg's reply to marquis' objection to a pro-choice view that there needed to be further explanation to the connection between psychological criteria and the wrongness of being killed.
- Analyzes how marquis implies that the loss of one's life is one of the greatest losses one can suffer. he rejects that killing a biological human isn't the only circumstance where it would be wrong.
- Analyzes how marquis introduces kant's account that there is no intelligible reason why one who is hard with animals should also be hard in his dealings with men.
- Concludes that the general assumption of whether abortion is wrong or not is based on moral permissibility that depends on the moral status of the fetus.
- Concludes by providing personal analysis of their ideals and what they've learned in reading the essay written by don marquis.
1099 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of Abortionanalytical essayThe importance of the mother’s life versus the importance of the child’s life, the beginning of life in a fetus, and finally the consequences of abortion to the mother’s health condition and future pregnancies are all important factors that pro-life activists and pro-choice supports all consider when making a decision about whether or not abortion should be legal and funded for or not. Pro-choice activists ended up with the stronger arguments in that there are very valid arguments that point out why abortion should be illegal. Some of these reasons include the guilt and regret that the mother feels after abortion, the fact that abortion is the same thing as murder, as well as not viewing everyone equally. “In brief, there are no occasions in which the intentional killing of the pre-born child is justified.”
In this essay, the author
- Explains that abortion is one of the many topics that most people, around the world view as being immoral and unethical.
- Explains that pro-life supporters oppose abortion because it punishes the unborn child who committed no crime, and the perpetrator should be punished.
- Explains that pro-life supporters believe that abortion during pregnancy should not be considered murder because the unborn baby will be able to sustain life on its own.
- Explains that abortions can result in medical complications later in life as well as intense psychological pain and stress.
- Explains that the unborn child's right to life and liberty is given by his or her creator (god), not by parents or by the government.
- Explains that an ectopic pregnancy is when a fertilized egg implants outside the uterus. the medical advisory board at baby center says that abortion is the only option.
- Argues that abortion should be legal and funded for or not. pro-choice activists argued that there are valid arguments that point out why abortion shouldn't be illegal.
1527 wordsRead More - Is Abortion Morally Permissible or Not?analytical essayThe following essay will examine the morality of abortion with specific reference to the writings of Don Marquis, Judith Jarvis Thompson, Peter Singer and Mary Anne Warren. I will begin by assessing the strength of the argument provided by Marquis which claims that abortion is impermissible because it deprives a being of a potential “future like ours,” and then go on to consider the writings of Singer, Thomson and Warren to both refute Marquis claims and support my assertion that abortion is morally permissible primarily because of the threat to the freedom and bodily autonomy of women extending the right to life to a foetus in utero would pose.
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes the morality of abortion with specific reference to the writings of don marquis, judith jarvis thompson, peter singer and mary anne warren.
- Explains that to understand the argument, one needs to define the parameters of the debate and the key ideas held by each side.
- Analyzes how don marquis spearheads the potentiality argument in his essay on the immorality of abortion.
- Opines that the potentiality argument is difficult to falsify, it's easy to attribute potential to something and hard to dispute because it’s entirely hypothetical.
- Analyzes how thomson's violinist thought experiment provides an effective rebuttal to any conservative argument claiming a right to life in defense of foetus'.
- Argues that the crux of the abortion debate is not in a potential future or personhood, but the dangerous implications extending the right to life would have for the woman carrying it.
- Argues that abortion is morally permissible and should be readily available for women who do not seek to assume the responsibility of a pregnancy or fulfill the role of mother.
1311 wordsRead More - Abortion Argument Essayopinion essayA controversial topic around the world that I do not agree with is abortion. How would you feel if someone took your ability away to live? Imagine not having any say in whether or not you get to have a life. Well babies don 't have a choice in their mother’s womb. If a woman decides to abort her baby, they can 't do anything about their life being taken away from them. I believe abortion is wrong in any circumstance, there is always a better answer. Abortion is wrong because it is considered brutal murder, there are many other safer solutions, and it can harm the mother as well. If someone were to get pregnant after engaging in sexual activity, then they should take responsibility for their actions, and a life should not be destroyed due to inconvenience. Abortion is a terrible thing, you are purposely terminating a life, and that is the point I would like to push in the argument.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that abortion is wrong because it is considered brutal murder, there are many safer solutions, and it can harm the mother as well.
- Explains that abortion is wrong because it is considered brutal murder. ronald reagan said that the unborn human should be entitled to life, liberty, and happiness.
- Opines that human life begins with the union of the two sets of chromosomes. pregnancy begins when the embryo is implanted on the uterine wall.
- Explains that some people believe abortion is good and can save lives. they argue that a baby isn’t alive until it reaches the stage of life where it can survive outside the womb.
- Opines that abortion is wrong because there are many other safer solutions. the solution for a baby should not be death.
- Opines that they don't support abortion because it can harm the mother as well.
- Opines that abortion is a controversial issue around the world. abortion affects both victims in dangerous and physical ways.
- Concludes that when faced with the choice for a child, choose life, whether you choose to raise the child yourself or choose adoption. they believe abortion is wrong when used for selfish reasons.
948 wordsRead More - Analysis Of Abortion Is Immoral By Don Marquisanalytical essayFirstly, Marquis makes clear that we are working under the assumption that the fundamental disagreement present in the abortion debate is whether or not the fetus is a being worthy of being saved, and cites several writers that also believe in this fundamental disagreement to support his case. He then examines this paradigm as it pertains to the abortion argument, with pro-choicers on one side saying that fetuses are not rational actors, and pro-lifers on the other side saying that life begins at conception and making emotional appeals. He writes that the prima facie cases of the pro-choice and anti-abortionist movements are, respectively, that “being a person… gives intrinsic moral worth,” It is only… wrong to take the life of a member of the human community;” “It is always… wrong to take a human life,” and “it is always… wrong to end the life of a baby.” Marquis does not, in actuality, reject the validity of either side’s claims (185).
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes don marquis' "why abortion is immoral" to undermine the belief that anti-abortion arguments and rhetoric are based on religious or dogmatic arguments.
- Analyzes how marquis argues that the fundamental disagreement in the abortion debate is whether or not the fetus is a being worthy of being saved.
- Analyzes how marquis points out the difficulty in resolving the abortion issue by surpassing this fundamental disagreement.
- Analyzes how marquis offers us a solution to what he describes quite sufficiently as "this dialectical quandary," which is fundamentally "atheoretical" in nature.
- Analyzes don marquis' "future-like-ours" argument, which states that killing a fetus deprives it of its future value.
- Analyzes how marquis' claim that killing wrong is the loss of one's future is supported by two main considerations. the terminally ill and others with foreknowledge of their deaths hold the belief that their death is a very bad thing for them.
- Explains that unlike anti-abortionist arguments, this does not necessarily refute the morality of euthanasia, as patients who wish to die certainly do not value their future lives.
- Opines that marquis's argument falls apart, and acknowledges one of its principle weaknesses. they argue that there is no empirical way of deducing what the fetus' future existence will be like.
826 wordsRead More - Don Marquis Paper On The Morality Of Abortionanalytical essayMarquis holds that: if it is a morally impermissible to kill and deprive someone of a “future-like-ours”, then it is wrong to abort and deprive a fetus of a “future-like-ours”. It is morally impermissible to kill and deprive
In this essay, the author
- Analyzes don marquis' paper on the morality of abortion and judith jarvis thomson's.
- Analyzes how marquis' argument is presented in a format in which the premises and the conclusion are irrefutably true and are ordered properly.
- Argues that marquis' argument is valid and sound, but there can be objections. the biggest problem is his indecisiveness and improbability to draw a definitive line.
- Analyzes judith jarvis thomson's paper laden with thought experiments that showed the fallacies of individuals' beliefs in abortion.
717 wordsRead More - The Pros And Cons Of Abortionanalytical essayDue to the conflict of opinions from both sides, it is virtually impossible to solve the issue of abortion. On one hand, advocates believe that all humans should have the right to live regardless of the mother’s choice. On the other hand, the mothers’ rights are put into consideration because her body will forever be changed. All anyone can do is try to comprehend all aspects of this issue so that if put in such situation they can make an educated and thoughtful decision for themselves.
In this essay, the author
- Explains that many ethical controversies seem impossible to resolve in today's society and culture, such as abortion. they will briefly explore the pros and cons of these issues.
- Argues that abortion is a positive decision that gives women control over their lives, fertility, education, vocations, and responsibility to their families.
- Explains that hippocratic oath, written in 1964, states "above all, i must not play at god." an alternative to doctors "fixing" pregnancies could be preventing them in the first place by using contraceptives.
- Opines that a woman who has been raped should have the choice to decide whether she wants to keep the baby or abort it.
- States that roe versus wade legalized abortion in the first and third trimesters but only if the mothers health is in jeopardy.
- Argues that it is virtually impossible to solve the issue of abortion due to the conflict of opinions from both sides. advocates believe that all humans should have the right to live regardless of the mother’s choice.
752 wordsRead More - wwwwwwopinion essayThere are two great short articles that try to make sense of the whole abortion debate, shedding light on both sides of the issue. Judith Jarvis Thomson’s “A Defense of Abortion” (1971) is surely the most compelling philosophical article published on abortion. The structure Thompson puts in place has largely shaped the discussion since, by offering the observation that a child’s position as a person is irrelevant to the question of whether a woman has the right to seek an abortion. The opposing argument, “Why Abortion is Immoral,” by Don Marquis, supports the belief that killing a fetus is no different than killing a human, that the act itself is ethically and morally wrong In taking a neutral approach without interjecting my opinion, I’ll summarize both articles and attempt to portray each author’s raw emotional beliefs toward the issue.
In this essay, the author
- Opines that the abortion debate is a moral dilemma for which there is no universal answer. the civil rights movement, equality for all, and women's rights have all garnered more attention.
- Explains that judith jarvis thomson's "a defense of abortion" is the most compelling philosophical article on abortion, while don marquis' "why ab abortion is immoral" supports the belief that killing a fetus is no different than killing humans.
- Analyzes how thomson veers away from the ethical and moral debate associated with abortion and focuses on the woman's right to choose.
- Opines that marquis' article "why abortion is immoral" takes on the ethics behind abortion. he argues that killing wrong takes away from an individual a "future like ours."
- Analyzes how marquis responds to critics who argue that contraception is immoral. contraception prevents future life, thus preventing future lives.
- Opines that abortion is a hotly debated moral dilemma. roe v wade was an instrumental and landmark decision, giving women the right to choose.
841 wordsRead More - Marquis is not specific in his arguments in regards to when life begins, but rather a “majority of deliberate abortion is seriously immoral.” While Marquis is not taking the typical stance on pro-life, “It is always wrong to take a human life,” he does feel this viewpoint is too broad. Marquis enters his argument from a different angle than typical pro-life arguments. His primary argument is killing is not an act that is acceptable on any level. Additionally, when someone is killed, they are basically robbed of their future. What if the person killed was to have been the person who would have found a cure for cancer? Then the death of this person would be costly to society. This includes the case of an abortion where we basically are robbing the future of this unborn child. The unborn child taken because of an abortion could very well be the person that would have cured
In this essay, the author
- Explains that abortion is a subject of controversy and disagreement. judith jarvis thompson takes the pro-choice stance and gives unique arguments on the topic of abortion, while don marquis supports it.
- Analyzes judith jarvis thompson's pro-choice stance using examples that are easily relatable to demonstrate her point on the subject of abortion.
- Analyzes jarvis' sci-fi scenario where a baby grows rapidly and crushes you, and thomson's pro-choice arguments.
- Analyzes don marquis' argument that abortion is strictly immoral unless there is a rare case to be considered.
- Analyzes how marquis continues his argument by discussing the aspect of pain on the victim as referred to as the wanton infliction.
- Analyzes how judith jarvis thompson's argument about the violinist was intriguing and connected to life situations, even though it was not a real world scenario.
- Analyzes marquis' argument that killing is wrong and robs the unborn child of its future through abortion. he could have provided stronger stories to relate with his arguments.
- Concludes that abortion will be an ongoing topic of conversations for generations to come. thomson and marquis provide arguments that straddle both sides of the pro-life and prochoice fence.
1450 wordsRead More