Abortion Argument Analysis

488 Words1 Page

Abortion has been one of the most controversial and sensitive issues around the world. A large number of people have discussed for years whether abortions are acceptable and legal or not. Some people think women should have the right to choose an abortion, whereas, other people think that undergoing an abortion has no difference like killing a person. This essay compares underlying values driving the arguments in the Marquis’s article “Why Abortion Is Immoral,” Peter K. McInerney’s article “Does a Fetus Already Have a Future-Like-Ours?” and Tim Anderson’s article “The Right to Safe and Legal Abortion”. According to Marquis, abortion is immoral since it involves the killing of the fetus and “the loss of the future to a standard fetus” (194). Abortion can only be justified in some circumstances, for example, the life of the pregnant woman is in danger, or “the loss consequent on failing to abort would be at least as great”(Marquis 194). In order to strongly support the statement that killing a fetus is seriously wrong, Marquis offers two accounts as demonstration. One is …show more content…

To refute the statement of pro-abortion that an entity cannot control and decide the right to life unless it has the ability to desire to continue their lives, Marquis claims that a fetus fails to care about or take an interest in something does not mean that the fetus cannot have a right to it (Marquis199). Instead, the fetus can and should have the right to it because they have potential interest in it, furthermore, killing is wrong and fetus can be victims since “their lives are deliberately terminated,” and also “they are deprived of their futures of value and their prospects” (Marquis

Open Document