George Santayana puts it nicely in the above quote when he states, “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it”. Taking this into consideration we take a look at the United States Congress which is divided into several parties, such as Republican, Democrat, and Independent being the main ones. With the enmity between these parties, Democrat and Republican being the worse, our nation is slowly beginning to decay. It is a chain reaction that builds and climbs each time these parties have disagreeing ideas and try to change what the other has done previously. We as a country need to stand together and erase this distance that we hold between each other. Our Political system is our backbone so we need to buckle down and start working together, learn from our past mistakes. In his article, “Elston He on Abolishing Political Parties” Elston He gives his opinion about political parties, “Political parties were created to express common views, to propose a common platform, and to unify members of American political society so that action could be taken. Today, however, political parties are simply used as perfunctory labels and to categorize people as this or that”. This is a good statement to show just how divided America has become. We as a country should abolish all political parties and run as a whole instead of separately as enemies because, together we are stronger then we are apart, government formation should be built upon honesty and integrity not lies, and political parties will only lead to disaster.
Every time the election polls come around our country appears to be in a small war against its self. Minds are split and people begin to discriminate against each other over small technicalities that we s...
... middle of paper ...
...ns." Dave Leip's Atlas of U.S. Presidential Elections. Web. 18 Aug. 2011.
.
6. Knee, Iron. "Political Irony › Personally, I’d like to Abolish Political Parties." Political Irony › Humor and Hypocrisy from the World of Politics. 4 Nov. 2017. Web. 17 Aug. 2011. .
7. Kruelgor. "Two Party Political System - Recipe for Disaster: Civil Wars throughout History." The Political Machine. 28 Mar. 2008. Web. 18 Aug. 2011. .
8. "Political Parties | Scholastic.com." Teaching Resources, Children's Book Recommendations, and Student Activities | Scholastic.com. Web. 18 Aug. 2011. .
Fairlie, Henry. The Parties: Republicans and Democrats in This Century. New York: The New Republic Magazine, 1978.
Americans have become so engrossed with the rhetoric of political parties that many are unable have real discussions about “freedom, fairness, equality, opportunity, security, accountability.” (Lakoff p.177) The election of 1828 gave birth to the “professional politician” it demonstrated how “ambivalence” on issues, how image and the right language or narrative can influence voters. Partisanship did increase competition and empower voters to a greater degree, but it has also divided Americans and obstructed communication. As one historian declared the “old hickory” killed the ideal of nonpartisan leadership. (Parsons p.184) For better or for worse American politics were forever be changed in 1828.
When America was founded in 1776, political factions were far less distinctively partisan than they are today. They more closely represented conservative and liberal sides of the political spectrum. Men ran for political office, holding their beliefs as their flag, not the party they belonged to. Unfortunately, this method did not last long. By the late 1820s, a strong party system had developed. However, there was still one group opposed to the party system, the Whig Party. Its history shaped the ideals it valued. Regrettably, the Whig Party’s short lifespan affected the national political conversation forever. The Whig Party’s interesting history and tragic demise are important to understanding the political system of the United States.
system produces conflicts between the Congress and the President and promotes very outdated beliefs that stem from the Constitution. A vast majority of the American population has the stern belief that the Constitution does not need to be changed in any way, shape, or form. This belief, however, is keeping the country from progressing along with other countries around the world. These single parties are holding control of multiple branches of government at once and monopolizing the power during their respective terms. The government “faces an incapacity to govern since each party works as a majority party” and believes there is no reason for innovation (Dulio & Thurber, 2000). The two parties are seemingly always clashing about one thing or the other, making it difficult for things to get accomplished, and proves the thesis correct that the two-party system is ineffective for a growing country.
The Electoral College today is a very complex system of voting and campaigning. When it was first created, the Framers thought the average citizen of their day was not intelligent enough to know who should be leading their country. So they created the Electoral College which was run by people who knew what they were doing. The Electoral College is a body of people who represent each state and they determine the president. The real question is: Has the Electoral College gotten too far out of hand where it needs to go? The answer is yes. The reasons are because any third party candidate running in the election has no chance of winning any electoral votes. Also, it gives too much power to the big states in electoral votes. Finally, it creates problems on majority electoral votes and equality of smaller states is diminished.
The United States is in a tough position as far as politics go, there is a massive hindrance in the form of political parties. For many years now there has been a two party system, this has never been a good idea nor has it really worked. The ideas of the people haven’t been completely represented, there has been issues with getting necessary bills passed, and there is the issue of people not really knowing what a candidate stands for just what the party stands for. All of these issues, need to be changed and the only way to do so is to start and abolish the party system.
A two-party system is a political system in which only two parties have a realistic opportunity to compete effectively for control. As a result, all, or nearly all, elected officials end up being a member in one of the two major parties. In a two-party system, one of the parties usually holds a majority in the legislature hence, being referred to as the majority party while the other party is the minority party. The United States of America is considered to be a two-party system. A two-party system emerged early in the history of the new Republic. Beginning with the Federalists and the Jeffersonian Republicans in the late 1780s, two major parties have dominated national politics, although which particular two parties has changed with the times and issues. During the nineteenth century, the Democrats and Republicans emerged as the two dominant parties in American politics. As the American party system evolved, many third parties emerged, but few of them remained in existence for very long. Today the Democrats and Republican still remain as the dominant parties. These two parties hav...
With the increase of middle school drama among the nation's men and women in Congress, there must be something done in order to strengthen the country as a whole. Political parties are the main factor that contributes to the ineffectiveness of the U.S. Government. Political parties contribute to the lack of compromise that takes place in congress, they take the focus away from the main issues concerning the nation, and they divide the nation rather than unite the nation. Political parties must be banned in order to fix the nation and the issues that the country constantly
Beck, Paul Allen and Hershey, Marjorie Randon. Party Politics in America. 9th Ed. Longman, New York, NY. 2001.
There is much debate in the United States whether or not there is polarization between our two dominate political parties. Presidential election results have shown that there is a division between the states; a battle between the Democratic blue states and the Republican red states. And what is striking is that the “colors” of these states do not change. Red stays red, and blue stays blue. Chapter 11 of Fault Lines gives differing views of polarization. James Wilson, a political science professor at Pepperdine University in California, suggests that polarization is indeed relevant in modern society and that it will eventually cause the downfall of America. On the contrast, Morris Fiorina, a political science professor at Stanford University, argues that polarization is nothing but a myth, something that Americans should not be concerned with. John Judis, a senior editor at The New Republic, gives insight on a driving force of polarization; the Tea Party Movement. Through this paper I will highlight the chief factors given by Wilson and Judis which contribute to polarization in the United States, and will consider what factors Fiorina may agree with.
Political parties have been around since almost the beginning of this great country. Although George Washington strongly opposed political parties, and also warned the nation to stay away from forming political parties, the first political parties were formed right under his own nose. In George Washington’s cabinet was where the first parties started. The cause of these parties was simply differences in views. The thought of leaders of these two completely different parties was Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Jefferson started what then was known of as Republican or the Anti-Federalist. On the other hand Hamilton started what was known of as the Federalist Party. Both of these parties formed in the seventeen hundreds. These two parties have evolved into today being known as the Democratic, and the Republican parties. On the contrary one of the largest third party groups, the tea party was formed just recently in the year two thousand and nine. All three of these political parties effect our government today.
We are so politically divided today that it can break friendships, marriages, etc. Has it always been that way? I used to find adults fighting like children over political parties amusing and entertaining. I always wondered why people fought so passionately over politics like their lives absolutely depend on it. I recently found out how America was born out of deeply divided opinion. A majority of people wanted to be faithful to the King while the other majority wanted the opposite. After gaining independence from Great Britain, Federalists wanted a strong central government while the Democratic-Republicans wanted a government where the majority has the say in the government (Democracy). In the election of President Abraham Lincoln, the country
Wattenberg, Martin P. (1986). The decline of American political parties 1952-1984. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
Party is an inevitable feature of the democracy and it is defined as ‘an autonomous group of citizens having the purpose of making nominations and contesting elections in the hope of gaining control over governmental power through the capture of public offices and the organization of the government’ (Caramani, 2011, p.220). Parties are ubiquitous in modern political systems and they perform a number of functions, they are: coordination, contesting elections, recruitment, and representation (Caramani, 2011). Political parties are the product of the parliamentary and electoral game, and party systems reflect the social oppositions that characterize society when parties first appear (Coxall et al., 2011).
Whether political polarization is good or bad for the nation is still up for debate, but the general consensus is it exists due to a variety of reasons. From the construction of our Constitution, it is clear that the intent of our founding fathers was to create opposition in order to prevent tyranny from prevailing. Polarization is a result of the dividing of a nation into political parties. Though polarization has fluctuated throughout the years, it has caused a great deal of trouble in regards to passing legislation and has resulted in a gridlocked Congress. Even though some fear congressional polarization is destined to get worse, “it is mathematically impossible for congress to get much more polarized” than it is now.