As time changes so does the laws for the United States and a critical debate the supreme court has to face is if abolishing mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit serious degree murder is the right choice or not. Now in my perspective I agree with abolishing this system, juveniles have to face; which is receiving life sentences without parole. I believe these three reasons is what makes these young adolescents commit such serious high degree crimes; one can be due to their environment/raised, the tech/media a nd scientifically proven the brain is not fully developed between the ages that one is dissolving into a teenager. However, majority of supreme Court has decided to abolish mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit
murder,
…show more content…
Their actions are what clearly signifies the consequences they commit. Under the circumstances of growing up with one parent which in many cases the child does not receive the discipline they need to understand what’s is right or wrong. In other cases the child doesn't receive the needed treatment to confront their problems. They go through problems like bullying or cyberbullying, sometimes many get hypnotized on what they watch on tv. The difference between a teenager and an adult is that, adults have the capacity of understanding what's right or wrong. Many of them commit murder because they are angry at someone or are in some type of situation they can't find a way out of it. therefore, they commit murder know they will be sent to prison. On the other side teenagers act more on impulse when they argue among themselves and they commit these crimes because they think nothing will happen to them. I believe I am matured enough to understand what's right or wrong. Since I been disciplined and been given advice throughout my whole life by my family members. On not building up bad behavior especially to not take my anger take control of me. This is why I believe if a teenager is …show more content…
Fr om the articles in the modules that I have read in class these authors explain the importance of why young adolescents commit the crimes they do. Marjie Lundstrom in her article “Kids Are KidsUntil
They Commit Crimes” explains how the government is cruel and ignorant on the behavior of young adolescents commit. She argues if a kid is being trialed as an adult maybe they should lower the voting age to fourteen. Many kids eagerly like to do the opposite of what the parents tell them on what not do, but kids are curious and want to feel that sensation of how would it feel like. These are the kids that need that special treatment. Also she gives an example how tv programs can affects a kid life and actions. Affecting them in committing bad influential behavior things without knowing it was bad because they don't know the real consequences. Another author who I agree with is Paul thompson who is forward with abolishing the mandatory life in prison for juveniles who commit murders, he also agrees that young adolescents don't commit murders just because they want to but because they go
Maturity is not a fickle expression such as happiness or frustration, but rather an inherent quality one gains over time, such as courage or integrity. Before maturity can be expressed, the one who expresses it must have significant confidence in himself, since self-confidence is the root of maturity. Being flexible and formulating one's own opinions or ideas are aspects of maturity, but neither is possible without self-confidence. The greatest aspect of maturity is the ability to make decisions which society does not agree with. Whether or not one follows through with these ideas is not important. What is important is the ability to make the decision. These decisions represent the greatest measure of maturity.
“More than 2,500 children in the United States had been sentenced to life imprisonment without parole. Most juveniles sentenced to life imprisonment without parole had been convicted of homicide crimes. We estimated there were fewer than two hundred juveniles serving life without parole for non-homicide offenses” (Stevenson, 2014, pp. 269-270).
If a family member was murdered, a family member was murdered, age should not dictate if the punishment for homicide will be more lenient or not. If anyone not just juveniles has the capabilities to take someone's life and does so knowing the repercussions, they should be convicted as an adult. In the case of Jennifer Bishop Jenkins who lost her sister, the husband and their unborn child, is a strong advocate of juveniles being sentenced to life without parole. In her article “Jennifer Bishop Jenkins On Punishment and Teen Killers” she shows the world the other side of the spectrum, how it is to be the victim of a juvenile in a changing society where people are fighting against life sentences for juveniles. As she states in the article “There are no words adequate to describe what this kind of traumatic loss does to a victims family. So few who work on the juvenile offender side can truly understand what the victims of their crimes sometimes go through. Some never
Fair sentencing of youth state's “Children sentenced to life in prison without parole are often the most vulnerable members of our society” The Gail Garinger article, “Juveniles Don’t Deserve Life Sentences” discusses about children deserving a second opportunity. According to Garinger, children should receive a second chance and help so they could be mentally stable. According to Justice Elena Kagan she discusses that Juveniles without parole affects the way he develops throughout his life time. I agree with the majority decision that Juveniles should not be sentenced to life in prison and that they should be given a second chance because they deserve to fix their mistakes.
Critics of capital punishment hold that because most homicides are situational and are not planned, offenders do not consider the consequences of their actions before they commit the offense” (Mooney, Knox, & Schacht, 2015, p.133). Most people on death row committed their crimes in the heat of the moment, usually while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, or, in some cases, due to suffering from mental illness. These individuals are highly unlikely to make rational decisions based on a fear of future consequences for their actions. Criminals are mainly concerned with whether or not they’ll be caught, not what might happen to them afterwards.
There are millions of adults in federal prison, but The United States is the only country in the world that condemns children to die in prison (Pequeneza, 2014). It’s sad to think about children being sentenced to life in prison, and frankly it is a disturbing and a scary fact to face. However, in recent years the U.S Supreme Court has made it illegal to charge juveniles with life sentencing for anything less than murder (Pequeneza, 2014). This new law gives children a second chance at life when they are finally released from prison. Many children are forced to be in a household that is not suitable for a developing child. Children are mistreated, neglected, abused, and other factors. These unfit situations that children are in make them more likely to become violent, and maybe end up in juvenile
Many people say that the systems first priority should be to protect the public from the juvenile criminals that are a danger to others. Once the juveniles enter the system there is however, arguments on what should be done with them. Especially for those deemed too dangerous to be released back to their parents. Some want them locked away for as long as possible without rehabilitation, thinking that it will halt their criminal actions. One way to do this they argue would be to send them into an adult court. This has been a large way to reform the juvenile system, by lowering the age limits. I believe in certain cases this is the best method for unforgiving juveniles convicted of murder, as in the case of Ronald Duncan, who got away with a much lesser sentence due to his age. However another juvenile, Geri Vance, was old enough to be sent into the adult court, which caused him t...
Some of the perpetrators are the caregivers to spouses who are chronically ill. Another involves marriage, lovers who have lived together for many years. The main question, which remains unanswered is “why can some wake up one morning and decide to take away another person’s life”. According to Chermack & Taylor (1995), most of the perpetrators are usually mentally ill and challenged with extreme psychological problems. They may be suffering from strong stress and depressive disorder that affects their perception and feelings towards life. Although these people face blame for their undesirable actions, it is beneficial to make an effort to understand their problem (Kaukinen, 2002). Solving their alarming problem would significantly reduce the crime rates in the society and encourage the realization of a better environment.
Instead, these individuals are subjected to the structural violence of the system, and are largely given “life without possibility of parole” sentences. No matter how remorseful they are, how much they have learned, or how young and naive they were when the crime was committed, these individuals will never get the chance to live a different type of life.
developing mentally and emotionally. This can lead to poor decision-making and impulsive behavior. Additionally, studies have shown that juveniles are more likely to be influenced by peer pressure and external factors, which can lead to criminal behavior. Therefore, it is important to consider the age and developmental stage of the offender when determining the appropriate punishment. Instead of the death penalty, alternative forms of punishment such as rehabilitation and counseling should be considered for juvenile offenders.
- lack of communication by parent can cause child to be defensive and reject their responsibilities
In the eyes of those who are for the death penalty, they believe that the criminal
How can a word our society uses so much have such a loose definition. Teacher’s and parents refer to their children as mature or immature. But maybe one teacher’s definition of maturity is the child, —or adult, can press on while a fellow student is in trouble, to ensure he himself does well. While another’s definition is that the child expressed maturity for stopping and helping the other child in his decisions to avoid trouble. A common idea is that to show maturity one must weigh out all the possible outcomes and then ...
Discipline is a skill used to impart knowledge or to teach. There is a controversy between disciplining and punishing children based on ways involved and limits used. Canadian Pediatric Society recommends taking an anticipatory approach to discipline (Nieman & Shea, 2004, para 4). Parents should be asking questions based on the techniques that can be used at home to teach children. Control is recommended for children because it assists in changing behaviors, it is both temperamentally and developmentally appropriate, it is a form of self-enhancing, and it is always given by an adult who has a direct bond with the child.
Children grow up and move into teenage lifestyles, involvement with their peers, and how they look in other peoples eyes start to matter. Their hormones kick in, and they experience rapid changes in their minds, and bodies. They also develop a mind of their own, questioning the adult standards and need for their parental guidance. By trying new values and testing ideas with peers there is less of a chance of being criticized. Even though peer pressure can have positive effects, the most part is the bad part.