ASEAN Economic Community Case Study

1084 Words3 Pages

‘Institutional deficiency’ amid diversity: ASEAN Economic Community

In 1967, the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) was formed. It aims to establish a community that is politically, socially, and economically integrated. Seeing that economic development is pivotal for a viable regional integration and that SEA has a positive outlook if it is cohesive, the organization decided to include ASEAN Economic Community (AEC) among its pillars.

The AEC has four initiatives that serve as the focus of development within the region. These include creating a unified market where goods, services, capital and skills can move freely across borders; increasing competitiveness; promoting equitable economic development; and further integrating ASEAN with …show more content…

This barrier has resulted in non-binding declarations rather than clear policies in the past and even today. For example, ASEAN members, in 1992, committed to implement the AFTA in a bid to achieve regional economic cooperation, but after almost two decades, AFTA only had limited success as there was a lack of political will in confronting trade and other barriers (Bhaskaran, 2010:39). AFTA was also ineffective because implementation has been frequently changed and precision in the obligations of the members was lacking (Ravenhill, 2008:471). Following a 2003 McKinsey report criticizing ASEAN as having only a fragmented market of goods and services despite integration efforts, and as new regional challenges emerged particularly how ASEAN is getting left behind by China, member states decided to further advance its economic cooperation by committing, in 2003, to establish a fully integrated AEC (Ravenhill, 2008:471&476). But 13 years after, ASEAN failed to attain its goal still because of poor implementation of policies and agreements amid a weak institutional base or the ASEAN Secretariat for that

Open Document