preview

AIDS

opinion Essay
1008 words
1008 words
bookmark

AIDS

AIDS, is known as, the acquired immune deficiency syndrome and is the disease caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The virus is transmitted from one person to another through means of intimate sexual contact or exchange of blood or bodily fluids “(whether from contaminated hypodermic needles or syringes, transfusions of infected blood, or transmission from an infected mother to her child before or during birth)” (Schaefer; p. 119). AIDS has become a worldwide epidemic that has struck every identifiable group. However, persons who are considered to be in a high-risk group of contracting HIV are still stigmatized by the media and other professionals as being diseased. Individuals persist that AIDS is a gay disease and that if one is not gay, one is immune from it. Although, no longer do only gays, prostitutes, bisexual men, intravenous drug users contract HIV; the heterosexual community is also facing the epidemic at phenomenon increases. Until a vaccine and/or a cure is discovered for AIDS, the numbers will increase and people will keep dying.

The Slow Response To AIDS

“The first cases of AIDS in the United States were reported in 1981” (Schaefer; p.119). Prior to that, AIDS was not recognized as an epidemic for many deluded years. People with ascendancy all around the world who decided to do nothing “knew the dimensions of the coming catastrophe and the means available to slow it ...” (Gellman; p. 2). Yet, the people decided to direct their attention to things they believed to have more importance than the catastrophe of AIDS, “... other diseases were far more important than AIDS” (Gellman; p. 6).

In regards to the conflict perspective view, the response to the AIDS epidemic is slow because policy makers originally believed that the virus was only relegated to those of the gay community and those of heavy drug users. However, as the years went by, the AIDS virus spread or, became visible, to the heterosexual community and all around the world. The reaction to this problem is still superficial in regards of those who do not want to acknowledge AIDS as a catastrophic crisis. “Those who are dying from AIDS don’t matter in this world” (Gellman; p. 3), in other words, people do not want to sympathize with those who have come into contact with the AIDS virus and those who suffer from it.

In this essay, the author

  • Explains that aids is a worldwide epidemic that has struck every identifiable group. however, people who are considered to be in high-risk groups of contracting hiv are still stigmatized.
  • Explains that aids was not recognized as an epidemic for many deluded years. people with ascendancy all around the world decided to do nothing "knew the dimensions of the coming catastrophe and the means available to slow it."
  • Opines that the response to the aids epidemic is slow because policy makers originally believed the virus was only relegated to those of the gay community and heavy drug users.
  • Opines that aids was a matter of the society's priorities, and the united states saw it as something that cost too much money.
  • Analyzes the impact of the aids epidemic on social interaction and social structure in the united states.
  • Opines that aids cannot be solved as a biomedical problem and causes substantial change in sexual behavior.
  • Opines that aids, by itself, is reversing decades of slow improvement in child survival, adult longevity, educational attainment, and economic growth.
  • Opines that social policies have a better chance of reducing the aids epidemic because it is at long last being recognized as the social problem.
  • Explains that the educating of people is a major factor in reducing the epidemic of aids.
  • Opines that even though the united states realizes that aids is a crisis that needs to be dealt with in america today, they, or more specifically, sandra thurman, director of the white house office of national
Get Access