A weird way to kill for justice

A young charming handicapped man in college barely over the age of twenty-five, spots an older female. The swiftness of the female attracts him. The young man runs in the females direction, making the situation seem as if he had to rush. He drops his books knowingly, and in the process of bending over to gather all of the scattered books that previously escaped from his grip the female recognized the man’s broken arm. She starts to help the young man without asking. He obtained a smirk stare on his face, an unpleasant and uneasy stare. The man looks up at her, merciless and kneed the defenseless female in her youthful face. The female unexpectedly endured the dragging of herself to the vehicle of the savagely young man. The young man nonchalantly sped to his home where he committed several murders before without any remorse. As the long, bumpy car ride slowly startled and woke the young confused woman, she noticed something. Something strange. She realizes the once charming young man abducted her; she had no idea of where she was going. Trying to recollect her thoughts, the man knocks her out in heartless laughter. He brings the oblivious, still unconscious woman to his bedroom. In a rage familiar to the man, he breaks off a steel bed rod. He starts to unbutton the female’s blue jeans. Pulls them off gently along with her underpants, as if he could not anticipate whatever happens next. He grabs the stone-cold bed rod and shoves it ruthlessly up her vagina. This story holds truth and the young woman lived after the torment of what the man brought upon her and told her story. Ted Bundy portrays this character and received the death row sentence by the reason of assaulting and committing murders on helpless females. There exist many ...

... middle of paper ...

...ates promoting the death penalty and not showed a thirty-two percent difference. In any federal system today, there could appear minor or permanent mistakes if it showed information based off of a human statement for proof. However, the danger of making a misjudgment with the particular long process adapted in any death penalty cases occurs very minimum, and there appears no dependable information to display that any innocent individual received a wrong conviction since a case in 1976. Believed by many, the case had heavily based information on racial bias. The tradition of racial partialness and discrimination will always show present in the court of law. No justice system in one-hundred percent correct and makes the right decision, but by proof and carefulness of looking over evidence if one commits any misconduct worthy of the death penalty it should be allowed.