The government has placed many gun control laws, but some of the laws were made to make the general public feel safer. For instance the government banned a handful of assault riffles when they are not even used for most gun related crimes. The government also administered another law called the Bradey Law. The Bradey Law makes a five day wait on the purchase of a handgun so a check can be run on the persons background. None of these laws have decreased the amount of deaths caused by hand guns.
A much smaller number of rejections, 3,000, were due to violent crime convictions--and presumably many of these people just proceeded to buy a gun on the street. Brady law backers have focused almost exclusively on the value of background checks, the one part of the law that the Supreme Court specifically struck down. Yet there never was much controversy over this issue: When Congress debated the law, no one, not even the National Rifle Assn., opposed background checks. The dispute was over a five-day waiting period versus an "instant check." Ultimately, the success of background checks and waiting periods must be judged by their impact on crime.
Of the 100,000 gun related deaths, which included homicides and suicides, states with more restrictions tend to have less deaths in their states (Kessler). States such as Hawaii had a low amount of deaths by firearms because they had stricter gun laws. Whereas, states such as West Virginia had more deaths by firearms due to lack of strict gun laws. With this being said, stricter gun laws throughout America is not a bad idea. We would see a relatively low amount of deaths by firearms if we do so.
More people kill themselves with guns than other methods. Every year, “approximately 400 American children needlessly die and more than 3,500 are wounded because of unintentional firearm injuries” (Glatt, 2005). According to Hahn, Bilukha, Crosby, Fullilove, Liberman, Moscicki, Snyder, Tuma & Briss (2005), although rates of gun violence in the United States have decreased since 1993, they were still the second reason of injury death in 2001. This research paper will clarify gun control and violence in the United States by responding to the following questions: 1. Why has gun control been such a difficult issue in American politics?
Taking guns away from people will only leave guns in the hands of criminals. From a consensus from 2009, there are over 300 million people living in the United States. About one-third of the population owns a firearm. (Gun Control) The position that the government should take is that guns shouldn’t be taken from civilians since it doesn’t solve the problem for murder, but heavily enforce the process to obtain and keep a gun. From a consensus from 2008, there were over 16,000 murders in the United States, and from these 16,000 murders, 10,000 were from firearms alone (Gun Control – Just Facts).
Over 17,000 people are treated for unintentional gunshot wounds. That is only 3% of the fatalities that were unintentional. In 2010, firearms were the third leading cause of death among ten to fourteen year olds and the second leading cause of death for fifteen to twenty four year olds. The leading cause of death for young black males is due to the use of guns. John Lott and David Mustard had researched into the law that al... ... middle of paper ... ...to pass bans on the selling of weapons, which had been proven to have an affect on the crime rate in some states and cities.
Out of that 100,000 people shot, some of those victims consist of children, bystanders, fathers and mothers. The lethality of guns in 2011 firearms was responsible for 32,163 deaths in America (Alpers). Firearms have been used recklessly and claimed thousands of lives of Americans, increasing the death rate. If gun control was in effect and passed by legislators the deaths in America from firearms would not be so large. What also contributes to these facts is the ability to obtain guns for violent acts of crime which why the government need to suppressed and monitored firearms.
With these crime percentages lowering just small amounts it is still a big difference. When crime rates lower by one percent that it still an incredible accomplishment. Making stricter gun laws restrict people who obey the law and buy guns legally. Everyday people use guns in many different ways that are not harmful to society. People get into shooting compositions and aim at targets only.
In 1991, Bill C-17 promoted stricter guns laws and required individuals to obtain a criminal record check to acquire firearm However, in 1995 the Liberal government called for the registration for all firearms. Prior to 1892, any individual carrying a firearm without reasonable cause was imposed to six-month sentence. Since 2001, federal gun control legislation passed Bill C-68 which requires all gun owners to obtain a license to possess and acquire firearms. In 2005, roughly 16% of households in Canada possess some form of firearm. Due to the fact that homicide rates are dropping, gun laws disproportionately affect law-abiding citizens and gun control does not address the root causes of gun crimes, increased gun control in Canada not justifiable.
This flaw let 3,722 prohibited buyers to have access to guns. States also have the ... ... middle of paper ... ...em with the corrections mentioned before it will increase the safety of the U.S. people. The United States needs to have a nationwide gun sale background check system that will correct the flawed system right now, reduce homicides in the country, and protect the mentally unstable citizens from harming themselves or others without taking away their rights. Works Cited “Murder victims by weapon, 2007-2011.” The FBI. Table 8.