A Study of Girish Karnad’s Naga-mandala in Light of Kuntaka’s Vakrokti Siddhanta

2337 Words5 Pages

Much work has been done on Indian literature in English based on analyses through the tools of Western critical methods. The ‘Indian classical tradition’ is very rich and consists of perception and insight which serve as a best alternative to the western critical theories; but due to the colonial hangover we fail to appreciate and recognize our age old classical tradition of critical theories.
The Sanskrit criticism with its beginnings in the Vedic period, kept amazingly alive till the 17th century, presents a remarkable picture of continuity notwithstanding its diverse currents. The diversity itself is a part of its spectacular richness, depth and complexity. A body of criticism that offered such vitally important theories as rasa, alamkara, riti, dhvani, vakrokti and auchitya cannot be allowed to become obsolete and antiquarian. With the view to put forth an example of how efficiently a Indian critical theory can analyze and bring out the beauty of poetic expression the present study is an application of Kuntaka’s Vakrokti Siddhānta to the Girish Karnad’s play Naga-mandala.. It focuses directly on the poetic expression at six levels: phonetic, lexical, grammatical, sentential, episodic and compositional as a whole. These six levels as defined by Kuntaka in Vakrotijivitam are- varna vinyāsa- vakratā (phonetic obliquity), pada -purvarddha- vakratā (lexical obliquity), pada-paraddha- vakratā (grammatical obliquity), vakya- vakratā (sentential obliquity), prakarana- vakratā (episodic obliquity) and prabandha- vakratā (compositional obliquity).
Let us first analyze the play from the point of view of phonetic obliquity. In phonetic obliquity, similar or identical phonemes are arranged artistically in order to c...

... middle of paper ...

...to make an assessment of literature written in English. It is remarkable to note that these theories are more important than their counterparts i.e. the western theories.

Works Cited

1Girish Karnad, Three Plays: Naga-Mandala, Hayavadana, Tughlaq (New
Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2000), 45. Hereafter the textual citation will be in the text of the paper.

2 bhinnayorlinga yoryasyam samanadhikaranyatah / kapi sobhabhyudeyatyosa lingavaicitrayavakrata /

sati lingantareyatra strilinga caprayujyate/ sobhanisapattaye yasamannameiva stritipessalam/

visistam yojyate lingamanyasamin samabhavatyapi/ yatravichittaye sanya vacyaucityanusararatah/

(V.J. II, 24-25)

3supa-tin-sambandhais tatha karakasaktibhin / krt-taddhita-samasaisca dyotya laksyakramah kvacit / oa sabdannipatoparargakaladibhih prayuktairabhivyafyamano /
Dhanyaloka. ed. Acarya Visveswara, 271.

Open Document