Cosmos was the most popular televised documentary of all time. Carl Sagan produced the original cosmos titled "A Personal Voyage" in 1980, and Neil deGrasse Tyson produced "A Spacetime Odyssey" as a follow up in 2014. Though these two series are relatively the same thing -that being introducing the viewers to space- how they presented the information differed. The cosmos that captured my attention, and kept my attention was Tyson. Tyson had the advantage with the enhanced special effects, his tone of voice, and the arrangement of the cosmos. Though I respect Sagan it was hard at times actually pay any attention. As for Tyson I was able to process information because he had my attention. Neil Tyson had worked with filmmakers to better use of highly advanced technology to enhanced graphics and animation throughout the film. The difference in age between the two films is the technology. While Carl Sagan was very limited to the effects that they had in his time, for example using green screen as best as possible. Well as for 2014, a new generation we expect so much more from graphics, animation, and …show more content…
The difference between Sagan and Tyson is their tone in voice. Well at times I felt like I was being lectured by Sagan and his informative voice Tyson had more of an assertive, taking control, informing but interacting with the audience tone. Tyson wasn’t always presents but his voice was always there, explaining what he meant about things and showing while he explained -this is seen throughout the film-. David Wiegand Cosmos review in the The San Francisco Chronicle's says that Tyson had a way of, “making science fun and interesting even for people who wouldn't know an igneous rock from a composite, but without either talking down to his audience or making them think they're being held against their will in a postgraduate physics
The things the book and movie has in common is that they both have the same theme to them so they didn’t change the main ideas in any way. Such as Censorship can lead to a bad society. In both novel and clip technology is pointless existence.
Within William Rowe’s Chapter two of “The Cosmological Argument”, Rowe reconstructs Samuel Clark's Cosmological Argument by making explicit the way in which the Principle of Sufficient Reason, or PSR, operates in the argument as well as providing contradictions of two important criticisms from Rowe’s argument.
Natashia Trethewey’s work Beyond Katrina reflects on the past happenings that befell her hometown as well as that of her own brother Joe. Her poem “Theories of Time and Space” offers a powerful statement that encourages readers to think long and hard about its relation to the remainder of the story. The focus being on the concept of home and what it is means to not only be a part of one but also to be able to return to said home. Trethewey establishes this concept well throughout many aspects of her book, especially in her title choices and the way she phrases her words.
America went to the moon in the 1960’s, during a time of war, a time that was so far behind in technology compared to now, but yet human beings went to the moon . Human beings are capable of many wonderful things and their potential has no limits, except for the limits that are placed by government and society. Neil deGrasse Tyson attempted to liberate NASA from the limits of low funding by giving a speech to the U.S Senate. Tyson used emotion and logical thinking to make the complexity of NASA as relatable to the audience as possible, and by doing so he wanted to convey to them how important NASA is in our society today and the future of the human kind.
What type of film could be both enlightening and entertaining? Documentaries are. There is potential in a documentary film, also referred to as non-fictional films, which fictional films cannot grasp. According to Jack C. Ellis, a known documentary film critic, documentaries “(1) communicate insights, achieve beauty, and offer understanding.” They also “(2) improve social, political, or economic conditions” (qtd. in Phillips 299).
Cassian Harrison’s Greeks: Crucible of Civilization (1999) documents the history of ancient Athenian Greece between 570 BC and 460 BC. It was released as a three part series through PBS as a documentary of events through the lives of Cleisthenes, Themistocles, Pericles, and Socrates, as well as their contributions to ancient and modern society. Film scholar Bill Nichols qualifies non-fiction films as documentaries of social representation. Nichols states, “documentaries of social representation offer us new views of our common world to explore and understand” (2). Greeks builds a foundation of beliefs, practices, and events that can be directly linked to our modern world. According to Nichols, “The bond between documentary and the historical world is deep and profound. Documentary adds a new dimension to popular memory and social history” (2). Analysis of Harrison’s film allows us to understand how Greeks gives tangible representation to the world we already inhabit and share, makes the stuff of social reality visible and audible in a distinctive way, and gives a sense of what we understand reality itself to have been, of what it is now, or of what it may become.
The 1960’s were a memorable time, even now. Riots over war, women's rights, racial rights, technological advancements, and it being the height of the space race all shaped the main purpose of the show (Pop Culture Forever). At the time of the filming and showing of Star Trek: The Original Series NASA was creating Apollo, which would be the first rocket to send men to the moon. “The show played to our obsession with space flight and what might be cut out there,” admits Daniel Bernardi, a professor at San Francisco State University (Pop Culture Icon). At the time and even now space...
Tyson was inspired by his ability to combine his enthusiastic and charismatic teaching style with humor, motivating Tyson to “communicate the universe to others the way he
In November of 1919, at the age of 40, Albert Einstein became an overnight celebrity, thanks to a solar eclipse. An experiment had confirmed that light rays from distant stars were deflected by the gravity of the sun in just the amount he had predicted in his theory of gravity, General Relativity. General Relativity was the first major new theory of gravity since Isaac Newton's, more than two hundred and fifty years earlier.
Blade Runner became a cult classic. “The film may have survived long enough to benefit from a renewed taste for darker, more violent sci-fi. It’s appeal has less to do with a fascination for outer space (which does not feature beyond reference in a few lines of dialogue) than with a vision of earth and humankind in the near future” (Roberts and Wallis Pg 157-8). Both films have a timeless quality to it, as they are representative of the future of our planet earth. I find it so interesting that even though these films were made in different times their ideas about the futuristic city and society are almost identical.
Being perceived as a hero is commonly associated with the action of defeating a common enemy. Although this is true for most heroic stories, some heroes attempt to pacify the world through the education of others to prevent further harm. In certain instances, pacification or education is best suited to be achieved by heroes that are patient, understanding and giving. Countless stories of heroes also involve a strong upbringing that give qualities to determine the type of person and future actions that will personify their lifestyle. Most Greek heroes do not have the patience and understanding that allows Theseus to transform himself and the people around him. Similarly, Neil deGrasse Tyson, coming out of a tumultuous background, educates the populous to understand the world around them. Neil deGrasse Tyson and Theseus
Neil deGrasse Tyson’s interest in stargazing began at an early age, when as a nine year old, he stepped into the Hayden Planetarium Sky Theatre. As a result, Dr. deGrasse Tyson embarked on a lifelong fascination with the stars, enrolling in classes at the Hayden Planetarium, acquiring a telescope and spending long nights on the rooftop of an apartment in the Bronx studying the night sky (Biography.com). At the age of fifteen, he began offering lectures on Astronomy, which caused Dr. Carl Sagan, a famous astronomer to invite him to attend Cornell University, which he declined (Famous Scientists). He holds one Bachelor of Arts, Two Master Degrees, and a Doctorate in Astrophysics (Famous Scientists). He became the director of the Hayden Planetarium twenty-five years after the first time he walked into that institution as an eager child, where he
The first episode probes on the wonder around the cosmos and the origin of the conflict model between science
Since the days of Newton, the ideas of classical mechanics prevailed in the scientific community. The ideas of absolute velocity and absolute time were accepted phenomenon and were not at all challenged. However, as the nineteenth century drew to a close, new observations were being made, observations which contradicted the current theory of the time.
Overall, the Astronomy conversation was a success. Sharing of information led to new ideas and a great discussion on the future of space travel. All participants learned something new about the future of space travel. Last, it was obvious that regardless of age, education, or professional background, people are interested and excited about the future of space travel.