Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
how important is an organ donation
organ transplantation and donation
organ transplantation and donation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: how important is an organ donation
A Solution for Organs Transplantation
None of countries in the world allow selling human organs because it is against humane to put human bodily parts on the market. Patients with failure organs will have their name on the waiting list of donated organ three to five year, or wish their luck. In addition, candidates have to suffer pain and many side effects that causes by organs failure; they cannot wait five years for a new organ, such as kidney. Organs fail more quickly in patients who wait three years for a transplant versus patient who receive one immediately. According to Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) data as of 21 February 2014, the people on waiting list candidates are 121,342. The transplants performed from January to November 2013: 26,517. Only 25 percent can have transplant operation to survive. Moreover, number of organ failure patients will die every day and more than 10.000 patients join the waiting list every year. In fact, donated organs cannot catch the high demand. The prospects are grim for people in need of organ transplants. However, the shortage of donate organs will make desperate people turn to the black market to purchase organs. It leads to many crime scenes and unethical methods to chasing the organ demand. The creation of a regular market for the buying and selling human organs would increase the number of donated organs and save countless lives, thus benefitting society.
As long as transplantation has existed, paying live organ donors have been debated about ethical and legal. In the United State, the National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) states that anybody who has known as trading, acquire, receiving or transferring human organ will be fine more than $50.000, or imprisoned more ...
... middle of paper ...
...Waiting for Organ Transplants, June 2006." Electronic America. Ed. John W. Weier. 2007. Web. 03 Mar. 2014.
"Number of Organ-Transplant Candidates Registered with The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network, August 2008." Electronic America. Ed. Laurie DiMauro. 2009. Web. 03 Mar. 2014.
Park, Alice. “Should People Be Allowed To Sell Their Organs?” Time, 28 Aug 2012. Web. 1 Apr.2014.
Sayani, Daniel. "Presumed Consent Is the Wrong Way to Increase Organ Donation." Organ Donation. Ed. Laura Egendorf. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2013. Web. 03 Mar. 2014.
Smith, Michael, David Glovin, and Daryna Krasnolutska. "Organ Gangs Force Poor to Sell Kidneys for Desperate Israelis." Bloomberg Markets Magazine (1 Nov. 2011). Web. 03 Mar. 2014.
Smith, Michael. “Desperate Americans Buy Kidneys from Peru Poor in Fatal Trade” Bloomberg Markets Magazine (May 12. 2011).Web. 12 Apr.2014
First of all, we can assess issues concerning the donor. For example, is it ever ethically acceptable to weaken one person’s body to benefit another? It has to be said that the practiced procedures are not conducted in the safest of ways, which can lead to complications for both donors and recipients (Delmonico 1416). There are also questions concerning of informed consent: involved donors are not always properly informed about the procedure and are certainly not always competent to the point of fully grasping the situation (Greenberg 240). Moral dilemmas arise for the organ recipient as well. For instance, how is it morally justifiable to seek and purchase organs in foreign countries? Is it morally acceptable to put oneself in a dangerous situation in order to receive a new organ? Some serious safety issues are neglected in such transactions since the procedures sometimes take place in unregulated clinics (Shimazono 959). There is also the concept of right to health involved in this case (Loriggio). Does someone’s right to health have more value than someone else’s? Does having more money than someone else put your rights above theirs? All of these questions have critical consequences when put into the context of transplant tourism and the foreign organ trade. The answers to these questions are all taken into account when answering if it is morally justifiable to purchase
Organdonor.gov states, "Each day, an average of 79 people receive organ transplants. However, an average of 22 people die each day waiting for transplants that can 't take place because of the shortage of donated organs."
Death is an unavoidable factor in life. We are all expected to die, but for some of the people the end does not have to come too soon. Joanna MacKay in her article Organ Sales Will Save discuss how the legalization of the organs sale, possesses the capability of saving thousands of lives. MacKay in her thesis stipulates that the government should not ban the human organs sale rather they should regulate it (MacKay, 2004). The thesis statement has been supported by various assertions with the major one being that it shall save lives. The author argues that with the legalized sale of organs, more people would be eager to donate their kidneys.
Juan, S. (2010, April 10). New system to boost number of organ donors. Retrieved from http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2010-04/10/content_9711027.htm
In her article, Satel criticizes the current methods governing organ sharing in the United States, and suggests that the government should encourage organ donation, whether it was by providing financial incentives or other compensatory means to the public. Furthermore, the author briefly suggests that the European “presumed consent” system for organ donation might remedy this shortage of organs if implicated in the States.
The argument for organ donor system reform is compelling and strong. Satel supports her thoughts with facts and opinions from prominent authorities. As well as the argument is documented, there are a few weaknesses. While attempting to support her thoughts that having the body “for sale” would be socially acceptable, the author uses a source that could be seen as detrimental to her own argument. Stated in the text, “a recent poll by researchers in Pennsylvania found that 59 percent of respondents favored the general idea of incentives, with 53 percent ...
Weitz, J., Koch, M., Mehrabi, A., Schemmer, P., Zeier, M., Beimler, J., … Schmidt, J. (2006). Living-donar kidney transplantation: Risks of the donor- benefits of the recipient. Clinical Transplantation , 20 (17), 13-16.
A transplanted kidney can last a person their whole lifetime yet in the greatest country of the world, the government bans the selling of organs. This leads to thousands of citizens desperate to find a cure for themselves or a loved one. A solution to reduce our supply and demand gap would be to pay our donors. By paying our donors, this would increase the supply of kidneys tremendously. People living in extreme poverty are willing to put so much on the line for money. People in third world countries are accepting as little as $1,000 for a kidney just so they can supply their family with some food and necessities. This black market of organ trading needs to be stopped but we should not ask a patient to accept death easily. If organ sales did become legalized it would need to be highly regulated. Some people in less fortunate countries are only left to sell their organs on the black market. Why not build a regulated system that compensates people fairly and provides them with safety? As unpleasant as it seems to commodify organs, the current situation is simply too tragic not to change something. If coordinated properly, it could simultaneously satisfy the needs of wealthy countries with long waiting lists and poorer countries with overwhelming poverty. In the 1990s, after years of war and economic slumps, the country, Iran decided to compensate donors by paying them for
It is clear that a large demand for organs exists. People in need of organ donations are transferred to an orderly list. Ordinarily, U.S. institutions have an unprofitable system which provides organs through a list of individuals with the highest needs; however, these organs may never come. A list is
Yearly, thousands die from not receiving the organs needed to help save their lives; Anthony Gregory raises the question to why organ sales are deemed illegal in his piece “Why legalizing organ sales would help to save lives, end violence”, which was published in The Atlantic in November of 2011. Anthony Gregory has written hundreds of articles for magazines and newspapers, amongst the hundreds of articles is his piece on the selling of organs. Gregory states “Donors of blood, semen, and eggs, and volunteers for medical trials, are often compensated. Why not apply the same principle to organs? (p 451, para 2)”. The preceding quote allows and proposes readers to ponder on the thought of there being an organ
Throughout history physicians have faced numerous ethical dilemmas and as medical knowledge and technology have increased so has the number of these dilemmas. Organ transplants are a subject that many individuals do not think about until they or a family member face the possibility of requiring one. Within clinical ethics the subject of organ transplants and the extent to which an individual should go to obtain one remains highly contentious. Should individuals be allowed to advertise or pay for organs? Society today allows those who can afford to pay for services the ability to obtain whatever they need or want while those who cannot afford to pay do without. By allowing individuals to shop for organs the medical profession’s ethical belief in equal medical care for every individual regardless of their ability to pay for the service is severely violated (Caplan, 2004).
Through the entire essay she gives reasons and counterarguments of selling organs. At the very beginning of the paper, she clearly states her outlook, which is “Governments should not ban the sales o...
In conclusion, although there are some valid reasons to support the creation of an organ market based on the principles of beneficence and autonomy, there are also many overriding reasons against the market. Allowing the existence of organ markets would theoretically increase the number of organ transplants by living donors, but the negative results that these organ markets will have on society are too grave. Thus, the usage of justice and nonmaleficence as guiding ethical principles precisely restricts the creation of the organ market as an ethical system.
... will check to avoid all the risks that might occur. And according to professor Nadey Hakim, he believes that there should be a market for the organs instead of the black market (Smith, 2011). This idea will be lowering the problems of the black market or might even destroy the black market. It will be saving many lives and people will know were to go to get an organ they need that is safe without any consequences.
Each day, 120 people are added to the ever-growing organ waiting list. An astonishing 41% of these unfortunate people, that's about 50, will die due to the lack of donor organs in ... ... middle of paper ... ... nd of donor organs.