Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Puritanism literature
A Single Eye As An Attack on Puritanism
The seventeenth century was a tumultuous time in England; rife with
revolution she saw her governmental system, religious affairs and
legal code completely overhauled. All across Europe this type of
change was common, but England's changes were brought about largely by
the influences of and reactions to a variation of Calvinist
Protestantism known as Puritanism. Its followers clashed violently
with the Anglican establishment in a civil war and by 1650 the
Puritans had gained power over the Anglican monarchists. Executing
Charles I, Oliver Cromwell took the helm of the nation placing Puritan
values center stage[1]. Puritan morality, strict adherence to the
scriptures and rigid belief in predestination encountered active
resistance, inspiring counter-revolutions in thought that would put
freedom at the forefront of the English consciousness. Representing
the extreme of society's reaction to Puritan faith a group known as
the Ranters[2] emerged, publishing pamphlets that attacked the
fundamental tenets of Puritanism. Lawrence Clarkson, a frontrunner
among the Ranters, achieved infamy after having published a pamphlet
entitled A Single Eye, which was so radical that it landed him in
jail. A Single Eye is best understood as a response to Puritanism, a
reaction to the oppressive nature of Puritan faith, with the intention
to invoke the secularization of England.
The basic purpose of the pamphlet is to disseminate revolutionary
ideals, blatantly attacking the validity of puritan beliefs. At the
outset Clarkson insists that the English "supposeth God to be that
which is not, and that not to be, wh...
... middle of paper ...
...e Eye. 7
[9] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 8
[10] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 8
[11] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 9
[12] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 9
[13] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 2
[14] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 10
[15] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 10
[16] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 10
[17] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 11
[18] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 11
[19] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 11
[20] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 12
[21] http://mb-soft.com/believe/txc/puritani.htm
[22] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 14
[23] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 14
[24] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 15
[25] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 15
[26] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 16
[27] Clarkson. A Single Eye. 16
[28] Hill. The Experience of Defeat. 38
[29]
http://dwardmac.pitzer.edu/Anarchist_Archives/goldman/aando/puritanism.html
Voigt-Kampff machine. The Voigt-Kampff machine identifies replicants by looking for emotional response in the "capillary dilation of the so called blush response" the "fluctuation of the pupil" and "involuntary dilation of the iris." The close-up of the eye that the Voigt-Kampff apparatus displays enables the blade runner to see emotional ... ... middle of paper ... ... thin line between good and evil, human and inhuman? But this is the power of the film's message, because the text refuses to endorse
Thomas Morton and the Puritans An anti-"city on a hill" with a maypole compensating for something? A pleasurable refuge for indentured servants freed from service and respected natives? A place where a man just wanted to annoy his uptight, religious neighbors? Those are the obvious conclusions, but with like most anything in history, there's meaning and significance that we don't catch at first glance. Thomas Morton had an agenda, puritan leader John Winthrop may have had a secret, and there
while “of all the religious bodies in America at the close of the American Revolution, the Methodists were the most insignificant,” it can now safely be said that “Methodism was to the West what Puritanism was to New England,” (3) that is, the dominant cultural and religious force. In fact, he claims, “no single force had more to do with bringing order out of frontier chaos than the Methodist circuit-rider,” (3). So, how was it that Methodism, so insignificant at the founding of our country, became,