Emergency Department Case Study

705 Words2 Pages

I believe that if you asked a group of people to list off issues regarding an emergency department then they would say long wait times throughout the process and being moved around to different areas of the emergency department. From what I have heard the long waits can be associated with waiting to get back to a room, waiting to see a nurse, waiting to see a doctor, waiting to go to radiology or lab, waiting on results, waiting to be discharged, or waiting to be admitted. All of these things in my opinion add up to one main problem, which is patient flow through an emergency department. In my opinion being able to have a controlled patient flow allows for improved wait times and decreased chaos for patients. So there are a few things …show more content…

The first thing is having a fast track unit where lower acuity patients are seen. Lower acuity patients can take up rooms and staff on the main side emergency department, which in turn can cause longer wait times for higher acuity patients in my experience. The second thing that I believe can improve patient flow is having physician assistance or nurse practitioners who can see the lower acuity patients, which in turn allows the physicians to be able to focus on higher acuity patients. The third thing that I believe can help improve patient flow in the emergency department is a discharge team who can solely focus on reviewing results when they are available and getting patients quickly discharged as soon as possible. I definitely believe these three things could greatly improve the major issue of patient flow in an emergency …show more content…

87). This study took a quantitative approach to show how the implementation of a fast track unit operated by a physician assistant could help to improve wait times for all acuity patients and improve length of stay for lower acuity patients (Theunissen, Lardenoye, Hannemann, Gerritsen, Brink, & Poeze, p. 87). There is a literature review under the heading of introduction included in this article and a theoretical framework is also present; however, most resources that were cited are greater than 5 years old (Theunissen, Lardenoye, Hannemann, Gerritsen, Brink, & Poeze, p. 87-88). Experimental design was used with this study since it examined the implementation of the fast track unit and then evaluation of the effects it had on wait times and length of stay (Keele, p. 41). A power analysis was used to determine sample size needed to show changes of 15 minutes or more in length of stay and wait times (Theunissen, Lardenoye, Hannemann, Gerritsen, Brink, & Poeze, p. 89). The extraneous variables are number of complaints, mortality, acuity level, and presence of complex problems (Theunissen, Lardenoye, Hannemann, Gerritsen, Brink, & Poeze, p. 88-89). The data was collected from the E-care automated information system for emergency departments (Theunissen, Lardenoye,

Open Document