Compare And Contrast A Rose For Emily And A Rose For Emily

1541 Words4 Pages

William Faulkner wrote many of his stories and novels that has a setting in the south. “A Rose for Emily” is one of them. “A Rose for Emily” has many similar and different characteristics in its setting as it is compared to Flannery O 'Connor 's “A Good Man is Hard to Find,” “Good Country People,” and “Everything that Rises Must Converge.” All of these writings have similar plots, and all take place in the south and show the differences in the north and the south after the civil war. All of them also contain death or twisted story lines. Southern gothic writing definitely that from Faulkner and Flannery O’Connor has similar situational irony, archetypes, and the gruesome events that occur.

Faulkner’s short story “A Rose for Emily” takes place in the southern part of the United States. This writing is seen as a southern gothic tradition. Southern Gothic came into use around the early twentieth century. Faulkner wasn’t the only southern gothic writer, but Flannery …show more content…

Flannery O’Connor is more obvious in her religious references while Faulkner gives small clues and hints towards it. In “A Good Man is Hard to Find” the grandmother has faith that the Misfit is really a good person, and she tells the MIsfit that he won’t shoot her. She has much faith in God that he won’t let him shoot her. But, then he does, which is where Flannery O 'Connor 's twisted irony comes into play. Faulkner doesn’t mention religion in “A Rose for Emily” and the absence of religion is the reason why things ended the way they did. There wasn’t any satisfaction in the ending or resolution, in Flannery O 'Connor 's writings there was always satisfaction in the end of her short stories. The reader would feel the main conflict is resolved, while in Faulkner’s works we never know the true ending and the reader has to make personal assumptions on what happens

Open Document