Writing is the timeless expression of human thought and emotion. Our history, culture, and ideas are recorded for the further generations’ benefits and well-being. Books are the portals into these records of out history. Through books the lone human addresses what one-thousand cannot. However, in our society, people challenge the messages in books, by way of censorship, hostility, and banning books from the reach of the common human. These books addressing the values of human nature and actions quickly find themselves challenged by the very society that refuses to acknowledge their content. Under the pretense of protecting those easily influenced, and preserving innocence, books draw an unnecessary amount of fire. These censored, challenged, banned books stretch into our high schools. Students who need to read the content within the works of lauded authors are denied. Banning books in high school will detract from student learning because of the irreplaceable knowledge and experience held in each of them.
Quite often members of religious groups take it upon themselves to determine the value of something. Those people who endorse censorship feel that they are protecting society from, among other things, violence, sex and the differences in sexual preference. At the same time, however, they are giving the power to restrict expression to a select few. Advocates of censorship feel that they have the right to ban works of art that express what they feel are erroneous ideas. What may seem erroneous to these advocates, may sculpt another's view on life and may reflect how they feel. Who has the right to determine who is right and who is wrong? The censors who feel that this right is theirs, also ...
An appealing advertisement for a new movie flashes on the screen of the television. At the end of the ad a flat voice informs you that the movie is rated R; admittance 17 and up. The argument for censorship for the general public, but allowance of access to more adult content to willing individuals, is an argument over 100 years old. In a piece for The Atlantic Monthly a writer addressed the topic of censorship of art in museums. The validity of the argument for censorship of art to the general public, but allowance for individuals that are mature enough holds true to today because there are children sections of libraries and museums, and even though nudity is so prevalent in today’s society, there is censorship of movies and television, and there is censorship of internet in countries around the world.
Threw out the article judy blmue wrote about censorship a personal view she takes her readers on journey threw her eyes and makes them hop in her shoes to take a test drive threw her life and show her ins and outs of how she experience and dealt with censorship , with coming in contact ,learning ,and rebelling against it. She does in her article by using some clever yet effective ways of using the Rhetorical Strategies to get the reader to think a certain way and feel a certain way. Jude blume use the rhetorical strategies ethos, pathos, and logos to effectively persuade the reader and inform the reader that censorship is not up to a group of people but a personal choice.
Because Art communicates real life situations and morals to young adults and children, it should not have to explain itself for what morals it wishes to express when society fails to expose themes of gender, sex, morals, injustice, religion, and history. The most historical pieces we have today are proof of the boundaries artists face when expressing themselves through multiple works of art, be it on a canvas or through a novel. So why is it that now there are pieces being erased from existence and labeled as offensive when art has always been a part of our growing society throughout every century? In the article,"A Brief History Of Art Censorship From 1508 To 2014," by Priscilla Frank, the following quote “Although it may not look
Throughout time and still today there are still people and communities who destroy and censor books or any other publications that might seem offensive or vulgar in any way. Censorship is any restriction or removal from the public of information or publications, or the prevention of free expression. In the past the world has always had issues with censorship and the restriction of releasing certain information or published articles within any age group or school district. It will not matter what year it is, or how old you are or what grade or the education you have, there will always be problems with censorship in schools.
Censorship in School Libraries: Yea or Nay?
Freedom is a myth, and does not exist. We are continually oppressed by people with higher authority and power, and always will be. As humans, it is in our nature to have opinions.
As the book was published and the general public began to read it; different opinions on the book started to come to fruition. “ The controversy began in March 1976 when the chair of the Long Island School Board, Richard J Ahrens, … ordered 60 books to be removed form the Island Tress School District High School Library.”(Nicholas 48). This appears to have caused many individuals and groups great concern. Their concerns mostly appear to be from rights violations. In 1979 a U.S. district court judge ruled that school boards have the right to determine the “suitability” of the content of library materials. Ultimately the courts became involved due to continued disagreements between the school board and those against the banning of the book.
I believe that people should be able to write whatever they would like on the internet, unless it is directly causing harm to someone and their livelihood. As citizens under the constitution, we have the right to spread our ideas and say what we would like, as it is stressed in the very first amendment. I believe that people should be able to have their own opinions on topics and whether people agree with it doesn't matter, because everyone has a different outlook on every situation. I think that in schools there shouldn't be regulations with the students that go there, in regards to social media, but I think that if someone's well-being is at risk because of another student, then I think that the school has the right to be involved. I feel as though a lot of schools don't really get involved with their students on social media, which I think is good, but in some instances I think that they could to help certain
The Scarlet Letter, The Diary of Anne Frank, and To Kill a Mockingbird all have something in common; these books, although great literary classics, have all been banned in schools throughout various points in history. These and other classics are vital for young adolescents to be exposed to since they instill important values and introduce wholly different eras with dated and unconventional ideas. Unfortunately, it has been decided by the government that such discrete books should be forbidden from schools due to parental concern for their children’s school reading. Even though this government interference protects what students read, such as the unconcealed use of profanity, racial slurs, and sexual references, books should not be banned in