A Rhetorical Analysis Of Appropriate Advertising

788 Words2 Pages

In Hamza Shaban’s article, One of the world’s largest advertisers threatens to pull its ads from Facebook and Google over toxic content, he is arguing to pull inappropriate ads from popular websites. Shaban effectively explains why the company Unilever, which advertises Dove, Lipton tea, Axe, and Ben & Jerry’s, wants to withdraw their ads from websites like Facebook and Youtube by informing the reader of the wrongs of the ads. I agree with Shaban’s argument that things such as fake news and hate are poor forms of advertising. At the very beginning of the article, you can tell that the intended audience is people who use websites like Facebook and Youtube and witness the inappropriate ads. “One of the worlds largest advertisers warned that it could pull its ads from online networks, such as Facebook and Youtube.” To go more into detail, it seems like they are trying to get parents attention because they point out that the ads are more inappropriate for children. “Fake news, racism, sexism, terrorists spreading messages of hate, toxic content directed at children.” This portrays pathos because he wants to catch parents attention. Shaban knows that no concerned parent would turn their head away from something that could harm their children. I agree with this because a lot of people who …show more content…

Shaban gives many examples of things to let the reader know the reasoning. “One of the world’s largest advertisers warned that it could pull its ads from online networks, such as Facebook and YouTube.” He starts off the article by telling the main point of the article. Then adds the examples of the advertisements, “Fake news, racism, sexism, terrorists spreading messages of hate, toxic content.” Shaban goes on to say what the company is going to do about the inappropriate ads. “Google said that it takes its partners and users' trust and safety seriously. "We will continue to work to earn that trust every day," the company

Open Document