A Review of Responses to the National Endowment for the Arts Report, “Reading at Risk: A Survey of Literary Reading in America”

During the past twenty years there has been much debate over topics regarding literacy and literature in America. In June 2004, based on their comparison of literary reading surveys from 1982, 1992, and 2002, the National Endowment for the Arts released the following statement.

The accelerating declines in literary reading among all demographic groups of American adults indicate an imminent cultural crisis. The trends among younger adults warrant special concern, suggesting that – unless some effective solution is found – literary culture, and literacy in general, will continue to worsen. Indeed, at the current rate of loss, literary reading as a leisure activity will virtually disappear in half a century. (NEA, “Reading at Risk”)

In recent years, access to the Internet has become available to Americans of all ages and cultural backgrounds. Some authority figures in academia see this as a threat to the perpetuation of printed literature. Other authorities view the Internet as an additional medium for advancing literacy. Another problem authorities face is one of definition. Some authorities want a broader definition of what constitutes literature while others insist on a standard of quality for literary works. What follows are some thoughts and opinions on these related topics and others.

Some critics feel the NEA survey’s narrow definition of “literary reading” is the NEA’s feeble attempt to designate genres of literary importance. The “Reading at Risk” study defines literary readers as those who read short stories, poetry, and plays in their leisure time, excluding any reading done for work or school or on the Internet (NEA, “Reading at Risk”).

Stuart Moulthrop, co-author of the online dialogue, “New Literacies ...

... middle of paper ...

...orum Blog. 29 Sept. 2004. <http://www.fis.utoronto.ca/resources/inforum/blog/2004/07/america-reads-reading-at-risk-survey.htm>.

Rachel. “More on Reading at Risk”. Online Posting. 23 August 2004. Banana Republican. 19 Sept. 2004 <http://blog.racheljurado.com/archives/000346.html>.

Schwartz, Nomi. “NEA’s Reading at Risk Elicits Strong, Varied Responses.” American Booksellers Association Online. 15 July 2004. 19 Sept. 2004. <http://news.bookweb.org/news/2716.html>.

Solomon, Andrew. “Reading at Risk: Lack of Interest in Literature is a Crisis.” Commentary – Columbia Daily Tribune. 8 Aug. 2004. 19 Sept. 2004. <http://www.showmenews.com/2004/Aug/20040808Comm007.asp>.

Wood, Peter. “Literature at Risk: The State of Our Reading Habits.” National Review Online. 19 July 2004. 19 Sept. 2004 <http://www.nationalreview.com/comment/wood200407190842.asp>.