Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effective approaches to leadership and management in healthcare
Professional ethics and values
Implications of business ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A Review of Business Ethics The first article I read for this assignment was “When Good People Do Bad Things at Work” by Dennis Moberg. I selected this article because I have wondered why good people sometimes get in trouble at work for unethical behavior. Also, I have been tempted to behave unethically at times at work and I would like to learn ways of keeping myself out of those situations in the future. Moberg’s article describes three top causes for good people behaving unethical in the workplace. The use of scripts was described as the first cause. Using scripts to address common situations can result in employees inadvertently missing clues indicating potential problems. Additionally, employees may use scripts to steel ourselves against feelings of empathy. The second cause of unethical behavior at work is distractions. Distractions can be a problem for good employee’s. They may make the unethical decision to ignore someone seriously in need of help because they are focused on an important task. Lastly, moral exclusion can result in good people behaving unethically. Employees have a tendency to morally exclude certain persons outside the boundary in which moral values and considerations of fairness apply. Fortunately, there are ways to lessen these three unethical behaviors. The use of scripts can be decreased by rotating tasks and keeping employees from performing repetitive work. Distractions can be lessened by leaders modeling the virtue of temperance. Leaders should enjoy employees to properly balance their work and professional lives. Finally, incidences of moral exclusion can be lessened by exposing employees to individuals who have been morally excluded. These business practices will help ensure good p... ... middle of paper ... ...eveal information and help protect their identity. O’Connell describes how whistle-blowers have protected themselves by hiding their tracks or not leaving signs. Additionally, she shared how one person is not enough. Thus, informants must find a trustworthy confidant to revel information to. Using these techniques will better able a whistle-blower to safely reveal information and make a difference (Kehoe 2014). This article was surprising to me because I underestimated the power of peer-pressure in organizations. Fortunately I know from reading Heineman’s High Performance with High Integrity, systems discouraging unethical behavior can be developed in organizations, giving employees voice. Such integrity systems aid in developing corporate cultures that encourage ethical behavior and reward reporters, aka whistle-blowers, of unethical behavior (Heineman 2008).
Their organizational initiatives are often self-serving; however, the emerging workforce isn’t motivated by selfish managers. This selfish behavior often turns into unethical conduct. Unethical dealings in the workplace are always wrong. It is crucial to promote ethical behavior. Everyone must understand that once caught, unethical behavior is not just a problem for those directly involved, it is everyone’s problem.
I certainly agree to the author and McNerney that the unethical dysfunctional company norm is the root cause of the ethical issue. It is this norm created by the predecessors who never set good ethical examples that influences the employees. They believed the politically safest way of executing tasks would be mimicking how their superiors get their jobs done.
Situations like feeling it is acceptable to take office items from the workplace, such as office supplies, even thought they would never steal from a store like Office Depot. By doing these things people are separating their personal and professional ethics, having one set of standards for work and one for the rest of your life. This mistake is then putting you at risk to become unethical and allowing you to use the excuse that you were just following your professional code of ethics. If everyone had a different code of ethics in the workplace then there is no telling how people would treat each other or their workplace. Whether we are in the workplace or at home, we all need to live a life under the same set of values that will guild our actions no matter where we are. Ethically, you can 't justify lying in the workplace for the "greater good" while never doing that at
The term Whistleblower means “An employee who discloses information that s/he reasonably believes is evidence of illegality, gross waste or fraud, mismanagement, abuse of power, general wrongdoing, or a substantial and specific danger to public health and safety. When information is classified or otherwise restricted by Congress or Executive Order, disclosures only are protected as whistleblowing if made through designated, secure channels. (What is a Whistleblower?)” The idea behind whistleblowers is that they believe trying to inform the public of illegal acts within their businesses has the potential to protect the public from wrongdoing. The following studies analyze scholar’s findings on different factors related to whistle blowing as
Ethical behavior is behavior that a person considers to be appropriate. A person’s moral principals are shaped from birth, and developed overtime throughout the person’s life. There are many factors that can influence what a person believes whats is right, or what is wrong. Some factors are a person’s family, religious beliefs, culture, and experiences. In business it is of great importance for an employee to understand how to act ethically to prevent a company from being sued, and receiving criticism from the public while bringing in profits for the company. (Mallor, Barnes, Bowers, & Langvardt, 2010) Business ethics is when ethical behavior is applied in an business environment, or by a business. There are many situations that can arise in which a person is experiencing an ethical dilemma. They have to choose between standing by their own personal ethical standards or to comply with their companies ethical standards. In some instances some have to choose whether to serve their own personal interests, or the interest of the company. In this essay I will be examining the financial events surrounding Bernie Madoff, and the events surrounding Enron.
Do you agree with Schmeltekopf that business schools are not preparing students well for the for the ethical challenges they will face in the workplace? Why or why not?
I discovered how sticking to one’s morals should be the topmost priority for everyone involved in business, whether personal or professional. Regardless of what the consequences may be, the intensity of the problem, and the complexities it may bring, sacrificing one’s integrity should never be an option, as integrity goes hand-in-hand with the morals of an individual (Duggan & Woodhouse, 2011). They further go on to say that having individuals take part in building a code of ethics that supports employee integrity, they will act ethically. Also, I believe that companies should place more emphasis on the moral behavior of their employees, and clear-cut policies should be set regarding such ethical situations. Furthermore, I realized how serving justice while making decisions really helps in the long run, and that opting to go for the ideal rather than they deserved is not always the best option, and could hurt a company in more than one
Explain the connection between the economic model of corporate social responsibility and “free market” or “neoclassical” economic theory.
Whistle-blowers face ethical dilemmas in decision-making about reporting organizational misconducts. Manager’s disapproval of whistleblowing hinders employee’s willingness to report internal wrong doing. High rank managers are not to empathic to whistle-blowers because this
Workplace deviance is a voluntary unethical behavior that disobeys organizational norms about wrong and right, and in doing so, threatens the wellbeing of the organization, and/or its members(Robinson and Bennett 555-572). According to Robinson and Bennett, “workplace deviances behavior varies along two dimensions: minor versus serious, and interpersonal (deviant behavior directed at other individuals in the organization) versus organizational (deviant behavior directed at the organization)” (555-572). Based on these dimensions it was further divided, into four categories: production deviance (leaving early, wasting resources etc.), property deviance (stealing ,destroying equipment etc.), political deviance (gossiping, favoritism etc.), and personal aggression (verbal abuse ,sexual harassment etc.) (Robinson and Bennett 555-572).According to Robinson and Bennett,workplace deviant behaviors cost U.S. companies approximately between $6 billion and $200 billion annually(555-572). In addition turnover, absences, and illness, and results in poor or lowered productivity, low morale, and litigation ., workplace deviances leads to misuse and loss of time, waste of resources, increases employee(Robinson and Bennett 555-572) .
In many circumstances, employees’ behaviors are likely to follow their leader. Enron’s leadership has been extremely influential due to exemplified charismatic. For example, Heffrey Skilling and Kenneth Lay, CFO and one of executive member in Enron, greatly encourage employees to follow their lead. Their incompetence accounting profession directly affects lover level of employees. Eventually, those manipulating accounting activities affect company collapse. Once leadership has done unethical professional accounting behaviors, unethical acts become accepted. Employees have many reasons for remaining quiet. While Enron still have ethical internal rules, when leadership in Enron did not abide and did not provide corresponding example of employees to follow (Prentice 2003, p. 417). Which eventually make Enron’s become one of the largest corporate scandal frauds.
An integrative model for understanding and managing ethical behavior in business organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(3), 233-242. Doi: 10.1007/BF00382649
Imagine a world without leadership, without risk-takers. The buildup for security would create a facade of a dystopian society with false freedom. The need for people to speak up is vital for a diverse, functioning environment. Whistle blowers are just the people who will expose the flaws, give the knowledge, empower the people, and count on them to make collective decisions on how to deal with these issues.
By inducting ethical business practices, the need for whistleblowers will not be needed, but there is always someone that crosses the line. Therefore, by encouraging whistleblowing and supervised departmental and corporate performance concerning ethical questions. Whistleblowing is an ethical procedure when there is clear evidence of serious evidence, that will harm the public and the blower has tried to find an internal solution to effect change. The whistleblower who is associated with the unethical activity has a moral responsibility to do the right thing. Companies always know there is a possibility that the whistle will be blown, in this case the obstacle is created by knowledge that their employees stand to gain an advantage from uncovering corporate misbehaviour and thus they may be proactively looking for other people outside the organization to inform the authorities.
The Facts: Kermit Vandivier works for B.F. Goodrich. His job assignment was to write the qualifying report on the four disk brakes for LTV Aerospace Corporation. LTV purchased aircraft brakes from B.F. Goodrich for the Air Force. Goodrich desperately wanted the contract because it guaranteed a commitment from the Air Force on future brake purchases for the A7D from them, even if they lost money on the initial contract.