Have a police officer ever abused a family member of yours? Police brutality affects communities by lost of trust in police officers. Victims and witnesses of crimes are much less likely to report crimes. Which brings problems to our communities. In this research paper, readers will understand when a police officer who uses force when it is not called for, or who uses excessive force to perform his or her job, have crossed the line into police brutality.
At least once a year, the news covers a story about a person being beat by an officer. The article “Minority Threat and Police Brutality: Determinants of Civil Rights Criminal Complaints in U.S. Municipalities” by Malcolm D. Holmes from the University of Wyoming, uses the conflict theory to explain why officers go after minorities sometimes causing police brutality. It explains the police’s tension with African American and Latino males. Those minorities are the ones that retaliate more against police officers which causes the officer to use violent force to defend themselves. Police brutality is when an officer beats a person or criminal even though they are not resisting arrest or fighting back.
Virtually all departments of the Criminal Justice System have codes of ethics and standards that are employed in the course of duty; the police department is not an exception. However, police officers may violate these standards in daily routines incidentally. According to the New York Police Department (2013), police deviance includes discrimination, illegal surveillance and use of excessive force, intimidation, sexual harassment, misconduct and corruption. Corruption is nonetheless, listed as the most widespread form of police deviance. Police corruption has detrimental effects to the public because it hinders the course of justice and the community’s trust in the police.
However it is not particularly obvious where brutality, discrimination, and misconduct end and corruption begin. Essentially, police corruption falls into two major categories-- external corruption which concerns police contacts with the public, and internal corruption, which involves the relationships among policemen within the works of the police department. The external corruption generally concists of one ore more of the following activities: 1) Payoffs to police by essentially non-criminal elements who fail to comply with stringent statutes or city ordinances; (for example, inviduals who repeatedly violate traffic laws). 2) Payoffs to police by individuals who continually violate the law as a method of
That, in turn, causes citizens to rely less on the police when they need help. DiLascio supports that idea in paragraph six of her article, it states that: When police are accused of inappropriate conduct, and when this conduct is either not thoroughly investigated or is dismissed in court, it causes people to question whether the police are really acting in the best interest of the community. This, in turn, makes people hesitate to go to the police when they do need help. DiLascio’s words are crucial when explaining how members of a community feel towards the police force. Many people feel negatively towards the police and the justice system when claims of misconduct go un-investigated.
We can put a stop to this and we will put a stop to this. If you ask a police officer their perspective on police brutality, their response will be much different from a civilian’s. They believe that some inexperienced or new to the job officers take quick action without thinking because they are under stress due to the situation they are put in. Just because you fire the “bad” police officers and hire “good” police officers doesn’t mean you are making a change. Another statement made by police officers is that the media transfigures the evidence and make them look like the bad person in the scene.
Also protect us from harm and that includes violence from the police. There are different cases of police brutality where some are racially motivated even if they do not admit to it; and there 's also cases where the officer goes into a situation with little to no information and so they are on edge. Police officers have very stressful jobs so it is understandable if they just could not handle the situation they are put in and used an unorthodox method. Many men and women who join the force are supposed to be trained to de-escalate the situation and reassure people of their safety, so what happens when the opposite happens? Unfortunately, civilians and officers have and will lose their lives simply because of the lack of education and lack of
However, whilst arming police with guns can act as a protector when on duty it can also cause an increase in police misconduct. This issue will be discussed throughout this essay. Firstly, it is important to consider that policing is wholly dependent on public consent. More recently, there can be seen to be a breakdown in the relationship between police and the public, which has ultimately led to the belief that the police are illegitimate due to a disproportionate use of force. Some researchers maintain a belief that brutality is used by the police to control a population considered undesirable, whilst they go beyond the law, it is a method used to achieve social order (Skolnick and Fyfe, 1993).
In some incidents misconduct is as serious as police brutality or something as small as inappropriate flirting on the job. According to criminology writers, deviant behavior is unlawful activity which is manifested within individual officers. Activities of misconduct are usually committed by individuals usually with a weak moral weakness, which can also be a sign of a personality defect. Police officers have inherent personality characteristic when entering the force, which predetermines if they will have “good” or “bad” cop traits. All officers before entering the service have their distinctive traits developed through their lifespan.
We all wonder why police officers get such a bad name. Most police arrest and conflicts do not involve the use of force. The ones that do require force fall into a pattern between the officer and the citizen. Surveys and research have been done to prove these statements. This book talks about the suspects perspective, and gives reasoning on why officers use force and are often retaliated with force by citizens.