test report

1546 Words4 Pages

Literature Review

In an effort to provide a synthesis of current meta-analysis research, the literature review focused on two (2) broad research topics, student outcomes and professional development and implementation. Additionally, 1:1 educational technology and K-12 technology initiatives along with research on the effectiveness of 1:1 implementation on improving student learning is addressed.

Four (4) meta-analyses were reviewed, utilized, and synthesized to provide information from hundreds of studies and systematic reviews specifically focused on 1:1 educational technology and K-12 technology initiatives. These studies have identified consistent findings regarding the impact of 1:1 initiatives.

Student Outcomes

Academic Achievement

Findings from Sell, et al (2012)
Research cited suggest that “specific findings on math and reading appear to be negligible or have mixed findings. Research into the effects of 1:1 computing have been too limited with regards to science or social studies achievement to draw conclusions” (p. 21).
There is evidence among multiple studies to confidently suggest writing has shown the greatest impact on student academic achievement in comparison to other content areas.

Findings from Bebell (2010) and Penuel (2006)
Student achievement showed modest results. Increases were seen more predominantly in English Language Arts than Mathematics.

Findings from Holcomb (2009)
Student achievement in relation to 1:1 show various outcomes. A review of one-to-one computing in Maine, Michigan, and Virginia indicate, “evaluators found that math teachers used the laptops the least as compared to other content areas” (p. 51). Despite this, the study conducted in Maine showed an increase in math achieveme...

... middle of paper ...

...ngs from Holcomb (2009)
Many authors suggest that all parties involved in a 1:1 initiative need to possess and maintain realistic expectations. It is often the case that immediate results are not seen with a 1:1 initiative and in some cases, authors have even cited an initial negative impact on teaching and learning at the onset. A period of adjustment should be expected, as it can often take “five to eight years for an innovation to be implemented fully and for the impacts of the innovation to be discernible” (p. 51)

Students in ubiquitous learning environments, where access to technology is available twenty-four hours a day, seven days a week were seen to be more engaged in their learning for longer periods of time. Similarly, it was reported that students were spending more time engaged with assignments and learning outside of school than those without access.

Open Document