Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
essays on animal abuse and cruelty
animal cruelty research paper
impacts of scientific science in our life
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: essays on animal abuse and cruelty
In Lab Rabbit Strongly Recommends Cover Girl Waterproof Mascara For Sensitive Eyes published in The Onion, the author who remained unknown, does a splendid job in mocking the Cover Girl magazine in respect to the way they cruelly treat animals to test their products, not caring what the after effects are. The author writes the article in the rabbits point of view, as if it were the rabbit telling the story, this gives the article a more personal feel as it is read. The author’s purpose for this piece of literature is to inform as well as entertain the reader, given the way the article was narrated, in addition to some particularly funny but also gory details. The most important point portrayed in the article is the rights of animals that are mistreated, killed and gravely injured in those big laboratories without anybody doing anything about it. Rabbit LR4427 is a great example of this, as the story is written in its point of view.
““And if you have a long day... or night," continued LR-4427, attempting a saucy wink despite his surgically excised eyelids, "touch-up's a breeze. Just pack more Long & Luscious into your orbital sockets, your nostrils, your anus–any of the delicate tissues that get stressed by your busy lifestyle–and you're ready to go."”(Unknown) In this piece of the article the author uses the rabbit to sympathize with the reader, as LR-4427 narrates a series of events that Cover Girl has done to him in the process of testing the product. As the audience reads this they can understand what types of torture LR-4427 endures during this painful process. This serves to inform the reader of the atrocious things done to animals during testing for products not juts only in cover girl but in other products as well. ...
... middle of paper ...
... author reveals how animals are treated harshly after then promoting the product in different ways. The outcome of the article is a narrative of a poor rabbit that has been mistreated by the big corporations, and these corporations try their different products on it every day. The rabbit then in a sarcastic way promotes the product. The rabbit is not really endorsing the product, but the author is using this style of satire to make the reader enjoy the reading in a funny yet informing the audience what really goes on inside animal testing facilities.
Bibliography
1. "Lab Rabbit Strongly Recommends Cover Girl Waterproof Mascara For Sensitive Eyes." ." The Onion. N.p., 29 Nov 2000. Web. 10 Feb 2014..
A societal courtesy is to not speak openly about mental illnesses that currently plague “approximately 26.2% of the adult population in the United States” (UW). With people refusing to acknowledge these issues, having any mental illness or disorder comes with a pre-associated stigma; which makes it hard for neuro-typical people to get to know those who have these issues. In Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, many of the characters have signs of one or more of these disorders. Of his characters, the White Rabbit, is the only character who has a seemingly clear defined disorder. The White Rabbit exhibits signs of having general anxiety disorder (GAD) throughout the book and is treated as such by other characters in the book. By
She sits alone in a threadbare, chilly, metal cage. Her eyes dart around wondering when the next torture will commence. If the testing fails to kill her, the stress definitely will. Entering is the doctor who plans to perform an eye irritancy test. The rabbit’s eyes will be held open with clips for at least three days if she survives that long (“Frequently Asked Questions”). Similarly, if these procedures would be performed on a human, they would be considered illegal. Yet, scientists continue to make harmless animals suffer incessantly. Annually, countless animals are abused in American test labs; however, alternative practices should be implemented in order to participate in worldwide trade, save innocent lives, and provide more accurate data.
SUMMARIZE: The article grants information on new models in cosmetics to take the place of animal experimentation. It goes on to talk about how the European Union has now banned using animal-based test for cosmetic reasoning. Pharmaceutical companies and regulatory agencies have been using computer-like tools to assess the toxicity it has for years. The author incorporates information on cosmetics and the outlook on further research. ‘According to experts, combination of laboratory-based with virtual work will be the future of testing and is progressing faster than they expected.” (87 words)
While the direct job, has rules against the Bunnies and their customers having a relationship these rules are not regulated correctly. After all, Steinem actually remarks about a Bunny that was fired for turning down a customer on a date. While inside the business, the Bunnies are constantly harassed about coming to meet their customers in hotel rooms and about their appearance. The prostitution does not end once their shift ends though, while walking home one evening exhausted and belittled, a taxi driver waves $4 around as if a Bunny should sell herself to him. When Steinem shakes her head in disbelief at his behavior, he actually remarks, “You work here don’t you”, as if it is expected of the Bunnies to be open to
The use of animals to test cosmetics is introduced in their article as well. The authors quote a vast amount of credible sources from prestigious universities such as Princeton and from well known animal rights group such as PETA. I will use this as my main source of information.
"Rabbits in Laboratories | PETA.org." People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA): The Animal
Jane goes to work everyday at an animal-testing lab. She pours liquids used in eyeliner into the eyes of numerous albino rabbits. The rabbits' eyes are held open with clips so that for the 72 hour test period, the rabbits can't even blink. The rabbits' bodies are in a box so that only their head protrudes. Jane watches the rabbits and records how the rabbits’ eyes react. She observes as the rabbits’ eyes bleed intensely. Some eyes become extremely deteriorated, and some rabbits even become blind due to the toxicity of the liquid being tested. As she walks down the line writing down what each rabbit's reaction is, Jane notices many rabbits have broken their own necks trying to escape the horrendous pain ("Product...").
Animal testing for products has been going on since the 1920’s, and cosmetic testing has been happening since 1938 (Murnaghan, "Animal Testing Timeline"), which means millions of animals every year since the 20’s have been cruelly and unneedlessly tested on. This unnecessary and cruel torture of animals needs to be stopped; animals should not have their corneas burned in order for people to have mascara and blush, especially when there are other, more efficient and accurate testing options available.
Which means that feeling may be the last decisive moment in whether a person believes the advantages of animal testing outweigh the problems connected with this practice. Almost all of us grew up eating meat, wearing leather, and going to circuses and zoos. Many of us bought our favorite “pets” at pet shops, had guinea pigs, and kept beautiful birds in cages. We wore wool and silk, ate at McDonald’s burgers, and fished. We never consider the impact of these action on the animals involved.
One of the largest controversies involving the testing on animals is the harm that is inflicted on them. Proof lies in the many leaked photographs showing the horrific pain that has been forced onto beings that cannot speak for themselves. A test called Lethal Dose 50%, or LD50, is a test to assess cosmetics such as lipstick, nail polish, skin care products, and others. This can leave the rabbits, dogs, mice, or other unfortunate animals left crippled with severe untreated chemical burns. During the assessment of the product the animals are force...
In one study conducted at a high school by Antonia Hall on a scale of 1-5 of awareness about this issue 52 percent of participants answered at a level three; not a single student answered any higher than that (Hall, 2014). Awareness is extremely low in this country and out of those who are aware the majority say they want to put an end to the suffering. In a survey conducted by PCRM 78 percent of people surveyed admitted that alternatives are incredibly important to develop alternatives to animal testing (New Survey, 2011). In another portion of that same survey 61 percent of those surveyed said that cosmetic testing on animals should be illegal; that’s more than half of those surveyed (New Survey, 2011). In the last portion of the survey 58 percent of participants said they will purchase cruelty-free personal care products (New Survey, 2011). In the study conducted at a high school in Fredericksburg, Virginia 25 students were asked six questions related to the topic of cosmetic testing on animals and their awareness related to it; when asked how many ads in the news, TV, or newspapers only 44 percent had seen more than just one or two (Hall, 2014). A national poll conducted in the year of 2013 the findings showed that over half of young adults showed opposition to cosmetic testing on animals (Hall, 2014). Finally, more than 70 percent of americans are against testing on animals for lipstick, eyeshadow, and other cosmetics (New Survey, 2014). In 2009, Europe testing on animals was illegalized (Cohan, 2014). Creating great strides in the leaping bunny
According to the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (2013) over one hundred million animals suffer and sometimes die from experiments to test chemicals, drugs, foods, and cosmetics (para 3). Although it is good that the companies are concerned that their products do not harm consumers, the law does not require most of these tests animals endure. Furthermore, these tests do not have accurate results, so the animals may suffer but the product is still sold to the people. While products that burnt bunnies’ eyes away are being marketed to consumers, government agencies are using taxpayers’ hard earned money to fund these horrible, pointless experiments.
Animal experiment is an important issue that people concern about before purchasing the product or service. Many animals are used in the experiments for medical test and safe test of new products. They are usually locked into a cage with loneliness, painful and fear surrounded. The locked animals may pull out their fur or biting themselves which is caused by the mental health problems. Also, some experiments may require dropping the chemical on the rabbits’ eyes. This can lead to painful since their eyes are very sensitive. There will be physical and mental problem caused by it. It is believed that using animals as a tool for experiments is morally wrong which have no proof of the positive effects to the society.
Each year, thousands of animals are brutally tortured in laboratories, in the name of cosmetic research. A movement to ban animal testing for cosmetic purposes has been gaining popularity, with many companies hopping on the bandwagon against this research. New alternatives have been developed to eliminate the necessity to test on animals. This is only a small beginning of what is necessary to end these immoral acts. Animal testing in cosmetics is useless and cruel, and can be accomplished by other methods of research to end the suffering of animals.
It still comes as a surprise to me that with all the technology in today’s society, we are still relying on animals for cosmetic research. Some people think that it is acceptable and even justified to test on mere animals rather than risk hurting people. So, for these kinds of people, animal testing makes perfect sense. However, in my opinion, animals are living creatures and have the right to live out their lives as nature intended rather than simply surviving in cages while being poked and prodded with whatever scientists fancy. I think it is depressing and sort of grotesque that I am using products that have been tested on animals that are even commonly bred as our pets. So, I began my research to find out what companies still test on animals, why they do so, and what other alternatives they could use in place of animal testing.