When we see little kids running around and playing or sound asleep, most of us think of them as angels sent from heaven. We, as parents and future parents, love to see our children grow to become handsome sons and beautiful daughters. We do everything in our hands to keep them in the right tracks to become respectful human beings. We would want to be with them every second of their lives, but at some point we have to let them go and set them free. At one point in life, everyone hold secrets, including our own children. Luke Chandler is the protagonist in the novel A Painted House by John Grisham. He was the youngest Chandler in the family. He lived with his grandfather Eli, his grandmother Ruth, his father Jesse and his mother Kathleen in …show more content…
In the afternoons, everyone met in town. This was a way to relax after a very long week of picking cotton. Here, people talked to each other about the latest news. Not only was news something big on Saturdays, but so were the usual fights. Everyone knows that kids should not watch anything so drastic like a fight and Luke knew it because he states “My mother had warned me against watching fights behind the Co-op” (Grisham, 86). But one particular Saturday was the exception. Luke had witness his first fight. The fight took place behind the Co-op, where it was usual for other kids to hang out. It all started when a lot of people gathered around to see what the commotion was all about. The Sisco brothers were picking fights like always. They were teasing a kid and Hank Spruill decided to go in and defend the kid. Hank taught the Siscos a good lesson to not bully anyone. This fight was so brutal that days later, the town knew that one of the brothers, Jerry, had died. Stick Powers, sheriff of the town was looking for witnesses to take Hank to jail, but no one would say anything. Luke did not say anything because he thought that by saying it was Hank who killed one of the brothers, then the crop would be at risk if the whole family decided to leave their …show more content…
It was a late night when Hank Spruill decided to leave town for the incident earlier in the story. That same night, Cowboy went after Hank to confront him because we knew that Hank was always getting into trouble. Luke had witness everything. This fight was not like the first one, it was so much worse. It started with just rock throwing to get each other’s attention. Cowboy had a switchblade in his pocket with the intentions of using it to harm. When things were getting at a max point where things were getting thrown at, Cowboy decided to bring out the switchblade out to the public to be seen. When Hank lease expected, Cowboy “drove the blade up through Hank’s stomach and chest… Then Cowboy yanked it out and thrust is in again and again” (Grisham, 330). The body was thrown down the river for the water to take away. As Luke was going back home, in shock, Cowboy catches him and threatens him to not say anything. Cowboy remarks “you speak one word about tonight and I will kill your mother” (Grisham, 334). Luke having witness this horrible deed and being warned about not saying anything brought Luke to stay quiet
The White Porch is a pleasant and easy poem to read. It resembles the tale of Rapunzel, who is famously known to have long hair. In the first verse paragraph, the narrator, who is implied to be a woman, is an adult who expresses that her hair takes forever to dry. Then in the second verse paragraph, she goes on to recall the times when her mother fixed and cared for her hair as a youngster. At night, she would let the rope, her hair, down and meet with someone, most likely a lover, privately. A similar aspect occurs in Rapunzel. Rapunzel would throw her hair out from her tower, thus meeting with her prince behind the witch’'s back. Like Rapunzel, the narrator treasures her hair greatly and even considers it like “a bridal veil.” Hair can symbolize
For instance, Dally did not have much to live for. No family that loved him except for Johnny, just a couple of Old’ friends. He already has a police record, because of how is is so disobedient to the laws. The only fun in Dallys life was picking up girls and finding some new ways to break the law. He never cared for anyone but Johnny, and once Johnny had died that was the end. Dallas did not know how else to handle himself. When Darry got the phone call Ponyboys thoughts scattered then came to a conclusion, “But I knew that was what he wanted, even as the lot echoed with the cracks of the shots, even as I begged silently please, not him… not him and Johnny both - I knew he would be dead, because Dally Winston wanted to be dead and he always got what he wanted”(154). Like Pony said, Dally always got what he wanted and he definitely did. Once Johnny died he did not care about anything in life. Conversely, Johnny had a lot to live for. He is only sixteen years old and he has a lot ahead of him. Johnny was very law abiding he tried hard not to get into any trouble or break any laws. Now that he has made that mistake with Bob he thinks he has ruined his whole life. He has not, there is much more ahead of him. Johnny had died a hero by saving all those kids at the burning church. He finally understands, “Listen, I don’t mind dying now. It's worth it, It’s worth saving those kids. Their lives are
The title of the book, ‘A Painted House’ is based on the actual farmhouse in which the Chandler family resides. It was an old house. It was a fine house that had never been painted. For this particular family, paint - like eating meat with every meal - was a luxury. It was not a requirement to have a painted house. It was not a sign of laziness as the reader might initially expect. It was a sign of being frugal with money. In this bold example of persevering and never giving up, Mr. Grisham demonstrates to the reader that ’one can’t have everything’.
Michelle Alexander’s book, The New Jim Crow, as well as Eugene Jarecki’s documentary, The House I Live In, both discuss the controversial issues surrounding the War on Drugs, mass incarceration, and drug laws. Ultimately, both Alexander and Jarecki concede that the court systems have systematically hindered growth and advancement in black communities by targeting young African Americans, primarily male, that have become entangled in drugs due to their socioeconomic status. There is a disturbing cycle seen in black underprivileged neighborhoods of poverty leading to drug use and distribution to make money that inevitably ends with the person in question landing in prison before likely repeating these actions upon their release. Both Jarecki and Alexander present their case, asserting that the effects of the War on Drugs acted as a catalyst for the asymmetric drug laws and
Borders detach us from the outside world; it constricts us with its walls and warps us into bystanders to the events occurring around us. Borders are a central theme in The House on Mango Street as we witness different characters trying to cope with the borders that enclose their daily lives, some attempt to cross it while others are held back by it. A common border which manifests in the stories throughout The House on Mango Street and Woman Hollering Creek is the boundary between the two opposing genders: male and female. This border between genders is created because of the expectations and stereotypes that are placed upon them, further contrasting the inherent differences between them and erecting a border that causes friction between the two groups. This border, stemmed from the differences between the two genders, manifests in different forms and are broken by different characters in the stories of The House on Mango Street as well as Woman Hollering Creek.
Though most works of art have some underlying, deeper meaning attached to them, our first impression of their significance comes through our initial visual interpretation. When we first view a painting or a statue or other piece of art, we notice first the visual details – its size, its medium, its color, and its condition, for example – before we begin to ponder its greater significance. Indeed, these visual clues are just as important as any other interpretation or meaning of a work, for they allow us to understand just what that deeper meaning is. The expression on a statue’s face tells us the emotion and message that the artist is trying to convey. Its color, too, can provide clues: darker or lighter colors can play a role in how we judge a piece of art. The type of lines used in a piece can send different messages. A sculpture, for example, may have been carved with hard, rough lines or it may have been carved with smoother, more flowing lines that portray a kind of gentleness.
This change may be eternal of sudden. The protagonist of the story, Luke Harding, is a dynamic character. ¨They almost got a member of the public shot! And they certainly got a very valuable mobile incapacitated.¨ This quote said by one of Luke's friends from when he was in school, caused an internal change in Luke. He decided that he should not involve MALC and any other friend in such an unorthodox case, especially if it could result in death. This quote had an effect on the plot because it was the start of the falling action, that would eventually lead to the resolution. It had an effect on the reader, because it led them into a satisfying ending to the story. Meanwhile, the book also had a clear effect on Luke, because the event changed his way of thinking. Instead of still thinking that it was right to do anything to catch the murderer, he decided to have boundaries on what he would do. Although Luke was one of the few dynamic characters in the story, Luke was also a round
In the novel, The House on Mango Street, Sandra Cisneros describes the problems that Latino women face in a society that treats them as second class citizens. A society that is dominated by men, and a society that values women for what they look like, and not for what is on inside. In her Novel Cisneros wants us to envision the obstacles that Latino women must face everyday in order to be treated equally.
...rld, parents need to provide them with structure, discipline, and emotional support. The word, “child” shouldn’t be interchangeable with “small adult”. Treating them this way can leave someone insecure, lost, and unprepared for life, as I frequently feel. People are becoming more and more likely to write children into their narratives as these self-governing characters who know what’s best for themselves, but however convenient and valuable that may seem, that is never the role they were intended to play.
The famous masterpiece Mona Lisa created by the late great Leonardo da Vinci was a
...could then cause anger and resentment towards the parents. Fear is also invoked in this article; the fear of the child losing that little patch of innocence.
As humans grow and mature, they obtain knowledge of the world around them as they go through self-discovery and learn from past events. In the story, “The House on Mango Street,” by Sandra Cisneros, Esperanza undergoes a series of transformations from someone who was clueless about the world, to someone who is experienced. Cisneros uses transformation to show how Esperanza changed from a clueless inexperienced girl, to an experienced adult. As one grows older, they go through self-discovery and experiences that help them gain knowledge of reality.
Without freedom, the urge to escape is prevalent. When a lady’s husband is too overprotective and smothers his wife, she may eventually end up running away from her problems. In the play, A Doll’s House, by Henrik Ibsen, and in the story, The Yellow Wallpaper, by Charlotte Perkins Gilman, the main characters, feel trapped by their husbands. Both of these stories demonstrate that during the time period that the stories were written, some men behaved in an authoritarian manner which caused stress and trauma to women. The women in these stories each take drastic action.
shot him. This shows that when a person goes against what is moraly right to
Jerry made a conscious choice of wanting to end his life, while Peter, a man that chose to act as the 'guinea pig'; and stayed and listened to Jerry's story, made a conscious choice of picking up same knife that killed Jerry. Although it was Peter who held the knife that killed Jerry, it was Jerry who took the responsibility to - despite great effort and pain – 'wipe the knife handle clean of fingerprints'; to allow no trace of the murderer. However, although Peter escaped without responsibility, he had to deal with the guilt that it was him who held the weapon that ended the life of Jerry. Peter had to face the rest of his life being aware of how others lived, and how one can feel so indifferent to the world yet live in the very same part of the city.