Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
shakespeare's linguistic devices
shakespeare literary techniques
shakespeare's linguistic devices
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: shakespeare's linguistic devices
1. What expectations are created by the title of the poem? Are those expectations fulfilled by the text? The title of this poem makes us think that this is going to be a love story with him and a significant other. But these expectations are not fulfilled by the text starting in the introductory epigraph. The title is completely ironic because this is not a “love song”, yet this story is about a depressed, lonely and weak man. The title makes us think that this poem is going to be a serious love song about J. Alfred Prufrock, but instead it is more of a fake love song. From the third line of the poem he shows a man who is unable to communicate, much less sing, “love songs” to anyone. 2. John Berryman wrote of line 3, “With this line, modern poetry begins.” What do you think he meant? The third line of the poem displays that …show more content…
The references to the image of “oyster-shells” tell the reader of his suppressed self. Prufrock compares himself to a few of the Shakespearean characters two of them being Hamlet and an attendant lord. The reference that Prufrock makes to Hamlet is a reference that he describes by denial. He says, “No! I am not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be” (line 111). Prufrock says that he is not Hamlet because he does not have the self-confidence that is needed in order to be the main character of a play. Prufrock references himself to that of the attendant lord from Shakespeare. The attendant lord is a character in the play that is of no importance, and is only there to provide enough time for the main characters of the play to get changed and ready in between scenes. In lines 114-116 Prufrock describes the attendant lord as “an easy tool, deferential, political, caution, meticulous.” Of these images that are represented in describing the attendant lord and Prufrock himself they all define a sense of negative self-
Eliot, T.S.. "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock." An Introduction to Poetry. 13th ed. Kennedy, X. J., and Dana Gioia. Boston: Little, Brown, 1966. 369-372. Print.
T.S. Eliot’s “The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock” tells the speaker’s story through several literary devices, allowing the reader to analyze the poem through symbolism, character qualities, and allusions that the work displays. In this way, the reader clearly sees the hopelessness and apathy that the speaker has towards his future. John Steven Childs sums it up well in saying Prufrock’s “chronic indecision blocks him from some important action” (Childs). Each literary device- symbolism, character, and allusion- supports this description. Ultimately, the premise of the poem is Prufrock second guessing himself to no end over talking to a woman, but this issue represents all forms of insecurity and inactivity.
On the surface, ?The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock? is about an older man who is distressed by his own inability to tell a woman of his desire for her. He tries to relay his feelings to her but comes up with all kinds of excuses not to, and ultimately does not. The speakers? real problem is not that he is just too timid to confess his love for this particular woman, it is that he has a somewhat unproductive, bleak life and has a lack of willpower and boldness to change that life.
"The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" is about a timid and downcast man in search of meaning, of love, and in search of something to break from the dullness and superficiality which he feels his life to be. Eliot lets us into Prufrock's world for an evening, and traces his progression of emotion from timidity, and, ultimately, to despair of life. He searches for meaning and acceptance by the love of a woman, but falls miserably because of his lack of self-assurance. Prufrock is a man for whom, it seems, everything goes wrong, and for whom there are no happy allowances. The emptiness and shallowness of Prufrock's "universe" and of Prufrock himself are evident from the very beginning of the poem. He cannot find it in himself to tell the woman what he really feels, and when he tries to tell her, it comes out in a mess. At the end of the poem, he realizes that he has no big role in life.
Prufrock’s allusion in the thirteenth stanza to Hamlet, the character notorious for not being able to make decisions, provides readers with a microcosm of Prufrock’s own unraveling. The opening of this stanza reminds readers that Prufrock is characteristically quite similar to Hamlet, in terms of the pressing anxiety and indecisiveness which they both experience. As the stanza opens, Mr. Prufrock makes it clear that he is not worthy of being compared to Hamlet in any way, articulating that he is “not Prince Hamlet, nor was meant to be” (111). William Irwin reiterates Prufrock’s thoughts contending that, “Prufrock is no prince Hamlet, who, despite being paralyzed for most of the play, eventually does take action” (187). After contextualizing
During the poem the speaker does not address his readers. The readers are simply overhearing a man assessing the society in which he lives as he daydreams about what is could be and yet what it is not. It is evident that his goal is to get the readers to look down upon this society which is so caught up in daily routine; prohibiting anyone from having freedom of imagination. This detachment that is created between the speaker and his readers incorporated with the boring monotone at the very beginning of the poem gives the readers a negative impression of the society before they begin to analyze the actual words of the poem.
The play focuses on the twins Viola and Sebastian as they separate due to a shipwreck and must meet again in the land of Illyria. After being separated by the shipwreck, both twins believe the other is dead and they begin to strategize their new way of living. Viola dresses as her twin brother Sebastian to work under the Duke of Illyria Orsino using her new disguise as Cesario. Sebastian after being saved by the sea captain Antonio explores Illyria with hopes of finding his twin sister. Viola’s new job working for Orsino is to persuade Countess Olivia to marry Orsino.
Alfred Prufrock,” we must briefly analyze the narration and point of view of the poem. From the first line of the poem, we can see that the narration is a Speaker that uses first-person pronouns. This means that the narration is either the author or a character in the poem. We know that the Speaker is not the author because the title tells us that this is the love song of J. Alfred Prufrock, so it is not a stretch to assume that the protagonist, Prufrock, is the first person speaker here. The use of second person pronouns also suggests that the Speaker is talking to another character. The phrase “Let us go,” suggests that, though we are uninformed of the specifics, the characters are set in a particular place and time. This tells the readers that we are dealing with a dramatic
How would it be possible for Hamlet to express or even recognize love, without having a clear definition of what love is? One may define love as a lover’s passion, devotion or tenderness for someone or something. Hamlet perceives love as an emotion that causes loss, devastation and pain. In the play, Hamlet, written by William Shakespeare, the main character uses love as a reason for his actions, but never truly loves any of the characters except his father. Hamlet seems to be more of a love story but, truthfully, it is more of revenge then love.
T.S. Eliot’s poem The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock has a plethora of possible interpretations. Many people argue that the poem represents a man who appears to be very introverted person who is contemplating a major decision in his life. This decision is whether or not he will consummate a relationship with someone he appears to have an attraction to or feelings for. People also debate whether or not Prufrock from the poem is typical of people today. While there are a plethora of reasons Prufrock is not typical of people today the main three reasons are he is very reserved, he overthinks most situations and he tries avoid his problems instead of solve them.
In the poem "The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" by T.S. Elliot, Prufrock is a man that is pessimistic, has low self-esteem, and has much internal conflict. He believes that he isn't good enough for the women of his desire; this theme also becomes a motif.
And “make our visit” indicates that he is on his way to social occasions. All of these settings and details in the second stanza does not seem to make any sense individually, but as a whole, they actually convey the narrator’s depression and loneliness toward his boring surroundings. In addition, in the next stanza, the speaker of the poem says, “the room the women come and go. Talking of Michelangelo.” At this plot, the narrator of the poem just skims over the communications among upper-class women. However, when to compare his preference toward the upper-class women who are trying to pose themselves as lovers of culture with the shantytown mentioned above, an obvious strong contrast is formed invisibly. Similarly, in the fourth stanza, the speaker of the poem asserts,,“The yellow fog that rubs its back upon the window-panes, The yellow smoke that rubs its muzzle on the window-panes”, the setting here indicates the speaker’s extremely empty and boring emotions, when the dusk comes. In conclusion, The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock is a love song without love. It’s more like a realism of plain folks who live in the oppressive and depressing modern industrialized
With time poems may have lost their voice, but not their importance. Up to this day, poetry is still one of the greatest forms of artistic expression; Poems speak to emotions and capture feelings. There is no right format of a poem, but yet a world of possibilities. Instead being unchangeable poems are innately open to interpretation; they should be spoken out loud in order to be “heard”, convey truth and cause impact. The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock by T.S. Eliot is an extremely meaningful poem; it is one of Elliot’s best-known works and without a doubt a masterpiece (Hillis). T.S. Eliot introduces the poem with a quote from Dante's Inferno (XXVII.61-66), and with that sparks our curiosity. He then makes statements and questions that perhaps everyone has done, or will do at some point in life (Li-Cheng, pp. 10-17). The poem is a legitimate work of the modernist movement, the language used is contemporary; the verses are free and the rhythm flows naturally.
The speaker in this poem is a poet but it is not to be confused with William Shakespeare as it is not stated that the poet is indeed Shakespeare. The speaker is very full of himself and controversial as he compared summer with his lover and ultimately insulted summer throughout the poem. The speaker is very full of himself as he says that he can immortalize his lover in his poetry due to the fact that people will continue to read his work and although that is true the speaker still seems a little bit boastful.
Love, or what is more commonly known as love, can take hold in an instant and feel very much like magic that is being put over you. It can make you do things that you would never of done and makes you feel like your floating in air. It hits you without you knowing that it's going to happen and there is nothing you can do to stop it. That is what A midsummer Night's Dream mostly consists of. But who speaks more completely, eloquently, and most compassionate in this play about love? Before you can come to a conclusion, you have to look at all the kinds of love there is in this play.