Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
essay about chemistry lab
observing chemical reactions lab report for chemistry
chemical and physical reactions lab report
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: essay about chemistry lab
There are many situations in which one may not consider it “evil” because one did not think he or she did anything wrong; however, it depends on how the victim views the situation. One night, my friends and I decided that we should work on a chemistry lab report together. Someone in my friend’s lab class asked for help, so my friend, Bob, went to go talk to him outside of our hall. One guy in my group suggested that we should lock Bob out, and so we did. Bob did not realize that he was locked out until after he was done speaking with the guy from his lab class. He began knocking on the door and looked at us through the window in Pentland, a resident building in the University of California Riverside. When most of us turned around to look at him, a girl in my group screamed “you’re not supposed to look at him.” This caused all of us to look away and to continue our mini conversations. At first Bob thought we were messing around with him, but because of what the girl yelled, he knew we were not going to open the door any time soon. This obviously upset Bob, specifically because it lasted way longer than it should of and he was outside alone for a lengthy amount of time. Bob was not let in until I questioned why he was still outside. Barely anyone in my group felt bad until Bob walked in and gave us the silent treatment for a very long time. This situation had many mini acts of evil in my perspective. There was nothing that I would consider complete and absolute evil, but there were signs of sadism, authority-oriented behavior and possibly a foot-in-the-door experience. A combination of all three could lead to a miserable experience towards the victim. In terms of sadism, it seemed as though my friends had “absolute or unrestricte... ... middle of paper ... ...s possible that this was morally acceptable due to the aftermath of the whole group feeling bad, most likely after reflection; however, this was only until after Bob showed signs of anger and frustration by giving the silent treatment. This makes it seem like it was a forced reflection, in which the group did not think badly of the incident until it affected them individually. Bob giving the silent treatment most likely made everyone feel uncomfortable and this led to the room going silent, this perhaps made others realize their wrongdoing. This form of “reflection” does not really seem natural. Overall, in terms of Mengzi, I do not think that this incident would be considered as absolutely evil, but rather just morally detrimental due to the fact that there was some sort of reflection. It is just that the way the reflection began was not the way it should have been.
...ess of who gets hurt. I began to wonder if it was truly evil to take what one desires, to satisfy your own gluttony even if doing so will cause someone else pain. For a split second, I thought of evil as a suitable answer to an unforgiving and prejudiced world.
There are many different points of view about human behaviors. Through specific characters mentioned in Fahrenheit 451, “A Very Old Man Enormous Wings”, and “The Lottery”, individual attitudes are exaggerated to the point that their evil motivations behind their behaviors are obvious. Everyday humans attempt to attach the connotation of good to humanity, but it’s just because humans want to look past the fact that we are realistically not good. It is very difficult for us to reflect on our own behaviors. Even though people try to avoid admitting it, we always try to be the best in whatever we do. We naturally make our own survivals the best we can make it. Harming others knowingly and enjoying it is a hallmark of being evil. Good is not only
Emily Grierson and Adela Strangeworth both resort to evil actions in order to gain control over that which they desired. Did Adela Strangeworth demonstrate a greater sense of evil for invading her town’s privacy, or was Emily Grierson more evil as she committed murder? The American Heritage Dictionary defines evil as “morally bad or wrong; love in public esteem” (DICTIONARY 249). Adela Strangeworth’s decision to disrupt her town’s privacy was bad and Emily Grierson’s decision to...
The fifth experiment of the semester entails a synthesis reaction geared towards analyzing the structure of a product. The starting material is isopentyl alcohol. When reacted with acetic acid with sulfuric acid as a solvent, isopentyl alcohol produces isopentyl acetate, which is the goal product, as shown in the reaction below:
This research paper with discuss how an inherently “good” person can under the right circumstances turn “evil” and the psychological effects behind the change. To understand how a person can cross the proverbial line from good to evil; evil itself must be given a definition. The word evil has been an overarching term to describe anything from biblical aspects to natural disasters, even to describe the human condition. For this paper the human aspect of evil will be solely focused on. Oxford dictionary describes evil as “profoundly immoral and malevolent.” To understand this further the philosopher Peter Dews Author of “The idea of Evil” writes “Basic notions of offence and punishment, of transgression and forgiveness, seem to lose their grip in the face of profound, far reaching desecrations of the human. For those kinds of crimes, “evil” is still the only word we’ve got.” (12) Through this research paper Ethics of these experiments will not be discussed. Each of these experiments in present day are considered unethical however, they served their purpose in finding what psychological aspects contribute to evil in a given individual.
Claudia Card begins by questioning the difference between wrong and evil. How do we know when something crosses the line between being just wrong, to being an evil act? How does hatred and motive play a part in this? How can people psychologically maintain a sense of who they are when they have been the victims of evil? Card attempts to explain these fundamental questions using her theory of evil; the Atrocity Paradigm (Card, pg.3).
In the novel, The Gathering, the theme good and evil and how it can be aggressive, abusive and violent is explored and developed. It is shown, that even though people are evil in this story, there are different colours and forms of evil. The way one person shows evil, could be completely different to another person and the extent of the evilness vary. For example, Buddha and his bullies are not as evil as Seth’s father and Mr. Karle. Seth’s father and Mr. Karle lead every other follower of evil and show them how to be evil. Buddha and his bully followers are only following the evil and treating people how they are being shown to treat them. Buddha intimidates Nathanial on his first day because he is weak and doesn’t fit in. Mr. Karle however calls Nathanial’s mother and “lies” to her telling that he believes that Nathanial is rude and disruptive in class and that he got a detention for this.
Evil can be a scary thing many things can influence on why a person may be considered evil or do evil things.People do things because they were influenced by others or by their own selfish desires,
In my opinion, what is considered “good” and what is considered “evil” is almost entirely subjective, though heavily shaped and molded by the society in which an individual lives. The established rules and norms to which every society adheres tend to be cultural and will obviously differ between respective cultures accordingly. One culture’s interpretation of “good” can very well be another culture’s interpretation of “evil” and so on. This is even true between individuals within the confines of the same society or culture—obviously not everyone thinks the same or holds the general rules and norms of their culture in high esteem. Another important influence on the way in which people perceive and regard what is “good” and what is “evil” is
Zimbardo, P. G. (2004). A Situationist Perspective on the Psychology of Evil: Understanding how good people are transformed into perptrators. In A. G. Miller (Ed.), The Social Psychology of Good and Evil (pp.21-50). New York: Guilford press.
Evil is everywhere. Some people do not mean to hurt others, and do not mean to be careless about others. Some people can convince others to make the wrong choice or to make a big mistake. Sometimes people do not know what position to take or what decision to make. That is why there are people who can convince others to be something bad such as a murder.
The scale of evil cannot be interpreted or defined. “Evil” does not even belong to a clear part of speech in the dictionary. Some argue that evil is a psychological complex, a noun. Others perceive it as a word attached to reality after the fact, an adjective. Joel Feinberg acknowledges the different layers of evil, but peels them back to reveal one common distinguishing factor, regardless of part of speech. While pieces of his argument are compelling, Feinberg ultimately argues that evil causes confusion beyond explanation. Feinberg’s argument crumbles when emotion is removed from the situation because “evil” is, oftentimes, the simplest resolution to a given problem. If these acts of evil are viewed with understanding, evil becomes entirely
“Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil.”-Emo Philips. When you have a specific situation such as a person having an evil thought in mind, revenge , or domestic violence you never know what may happen. During specific times you have to defend yourself based on another person’s intentions. For example, when you have a domestic violence call the victim is usually an unarmed woman trying to defend herself until the cops come. But if times come to it she (or someone being domestically violated) will have to hurt someone just in case to get out of a serious situation.
...ly or mentally, a conscious effort to injure others that is no obvious benefit to the human race is not good. I believe that people try to do good most of the time. For example, the person had a motorcycle accident. He hated by a car on the local road and stocked under the car. The car was flamed. This news is from the yesterday of FOX25. When I saw many people stopped and together to get the car off the person and being without thinking about the flames, I am so grateful. The man was saved and no life injury and the story have a good ending. Accordingly, people are innately good. I think I am actually a good person. I like to open doors, push in chairs, listen to people, and help little kids. No meter outside the world how changed it doesn’t influence my good personality at all. I agree Carl Rogers’s theory people should be capable of becoming conscious good.
Drawing a distinct line between right and wrong, or good and bad, is not always an easy task. Most people would agree that lying, murdering, and stealing are all very wrong indeed. Coincidently though, most people often would say they either have done/or would do one of the following things: tell a white lie to spare someone’s feeling, kill someone out of self-defense, or use someone else’s idea without giving them credit. Since there are exceptions to these “bad” actions, does that truly make them bad, or is it all a matter of perspective? From what I have experienced, the action isn’t quite as important as the intentions behind that action. In the motion picture Mumford, a man poses as a psychologist, and tries to solve his patient 's’ problems