A Jury Of Her Peers Literary Analysis

1117 Words3 Pages

“All oppressed people seize whatever weapons they can to fight oppression.” This statement,by John Lowe, proves to be an important aspect of the theme in the short story, A Jury of Her Peers. In this case, the weapon that Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters seize is silence. By keeping their silence, they are withholding what the men want most, which is to find evidence that leads them to know that Mrs. Wright was the murderer. The motives for the murder of Mr. Wright in the short story, A Jury of her Peers, are elaborated throughout the use of flashbacks, an oppressive tone, and omniscient third-person point of view. The role that Minnie Wright held before, when she was Minnie Foster , is explained throughout the thoughts of the female characters with …show more content…

This is proven through the lines, "Oh, well," said Mrs. Hale's husband, with good-natured superiority, "women are used to worrying over trifles."The two women moved a little closer together. Neither of them spoke. The county attorney seemed suddenly to remember his manners--and think of his future."And yet," said he, with the gallantry of a young politician. "for all their worries, what would we do without the ladies?" The lines stated above reveal that Mr. Henderson and Mr. Hale have a really general view of women. By Mr. Hale mentioning the trifles, one can see that they see women as something that belongs in the kitchen and believe that they worry about small things that prove to be of no utter importance. By the part of the quote stating, “ The women moved a little closer. Neither of them spoke”, it is clear to see the amount of intimidation and fear these women feel for their husbands. In addition, the oppressive tone can also be identified through the quote, “Do you suppose she was going to quilt it or just knot it?" The sheriff threw up his hands."They wonder whether she was going to quilt it or just knot it!"There was a laugh for the ways of women.” Once again, the men are being ignorant towards the important role of Mrs. Hale and Mrs. Peters. As it may seem that the two women are speaking of subjects that were …show more content…

When the men react with a sexist laugh, the ladies react in a passive aggressive matter to the comments the men are making. This can be seen through, “I don't see as there's anything so strange," Mrs. Hale said resentfully, after the outside door had closed on the three men--"our taking up our time with little things while we're waiting for them to get the evidence. I don't see as it's anything to laugh about." Although Mrs. Hale, does not aggressively portray their feelings to what Mr. Peters says, one can notice quickly that she was upset by the comment that was made. This can represent the passive aggressiveness the ladies are feeling towards the comments that the men making. Without the use of omniscient third person narrator, we would not be able to tell or understand what the women feel toward what the men are commenting, or vice versa. The fact that the point of view is omniscient third person helps the reader get an overall greater understanding of the story in itself and how everything connects, especially to the the theme of

Open Document