Inspiration may be a form of super-consciousness, or perhaps of subconsciousness—I wouldn’t know. But I am sure it is the antithesis of self-consciousness.
Only one man could claim the title as probably the greatest composer in American history for writing so many unforgettable works: Aaron Copland. He lived a life inspired by many things as well as inspiring people all across the nation, and it really led to the opposite of being drawn into himself, as he described in the quote above. He was born in Brooklyn, New York on November 14 in 1900. He was the youngest of five children to Sarah and Harris Copland. A musical spark came out in Copland already at the age of 11 as he began piano lessons with his sister. His musical talents needed tutoring from a higher level of teaching and so he studied with a professional piano teacher, Ludwig Wolfsohn, at age 14. Copland said later, “No one ever connected music with my family. The idea was entirely original with me. And unfortunately the idea occurred to me seriously only at 13 or thereabouts—which is rather late for a musician to get started,” (Charles Moritz 190). He graduated in 1918 and was able to devote all his time to writing and composing music. Wanting to further his knowledge in music, he was taught harmony and counterpoint by Rubin Goldmark. Understandably, the two men shared different views and Goldmark completely disagreed with Copland’s styles, so to demonstrate his own stubbornness, Copland came back to Goldmark with a piece he wrote entitled “The Cat and The Mouse,” (Charles Moritz 191). Copland would then attend the newly established American Conservatory at Fontainebleau in Paris, and he was honored in being the first American student of the amazing teacher, Nadia Boulanger. After three years he returned to New York without any knowledge of how a composer got his works published or performed, nor how he planned on keeping himself financially stable. Copland ended his troubling when he was given a grant of from two Guggenheim Fellowships, and some women who found an interest in his compositions that gave him some donations so he could devote all his time to writing. His first major work upon returning to America was “Symphony for Organ and Orchestra” which he wrote just for the few performances of Nadia Boulanger; the first one in Carnegie Hall in 1925 and another in...
... middle of paper ...
...rs Alliance. He was continually given many awards, like an Academy Award nomination for film score of “North Star”, an Academy Award for best original musical score in “The Heiress”, the Pulitzer Prize in music, the New York Music Critics Circle Award for “Appalachian Spring”, the Gold Medal of the American Academy Institute of Arts and Letters, the MacDowell Colony Medal of Honor, winning the RCA Victor Composer’ Competition with “Dance Symphony”, the Presidential Medal of Freedom (America’s top civilian honor), the Kennedy Center Honors, the Congressional Medal of Honor, the National Medal of Arts (given to him by President Reagan), the Commander’s Cross of the Order of Merit from West Germany, the Howland Memorial Medal from Yale University, and the Department of Music at Queens College of the City University of New York was renamed Aaron Copland School of Music. After 1970, Copland continued lecturing and some conducting as he gradually stopped composing. He died at Phelps Memorial Hospital in Tarrytown, New York on December 2 after 90 years of musical genius and American glory. His ashes were scattered at Tanglewood, but the legend of Aaron Copland resides in us all forever.
Classical music can be best summed by Mr. Dan Romano who said, “Music is the hardest kind of art. It doesn't hang up on a wall and wait to be stared at and enjoyed by passersby. It's communication. Its hours and hours being put into a work of art that may only last, in reality, for a few moments...but if done well and truly appreciated, it lasts in our hearts forever. That's art, speaking with your heart to the hearts of others.” Starting at a young age Johann Sebastian Bach and Ludwig van Beethoven have done just that with their musical compositions. Both musical composers changed the world of music and captivated the hearts of many. Their love of composing shared many similar traits, though their musical styles were much different.
It was not only until the spring of that year that he for first time left Hamburg professionally. He undertook a tour with the Hungarian violinist Eduard Remenyi for the purpose of introducing himself and his works. At Gottingen they gave a concert in which the young pianist made a deep impression upon the musicians present. He and Remenyi were to play Beethoven?s Kreutzer sonata, but at the last moment it was discovered that the piano was half a tone too low.
While Tchaikovsky is known for his compositions of classical ballet, he was overall great as a pianist. Like most composers of music, his compositions reflected that of his feelings greatly, which helped him connect to the public and spread his music quite well. As a child, he became better than his teacher in one year, and at the age of ten went to the School of Jurisprudence and quickly completed the upper division classes. After graduating, he did four years at the Ministry of Justice, which didn’t really suite him well. Once out of the Ministry of Justice in the 1860s, he joined the Music Conservatory at the age of 22. Shortly after joining, he composed his first orchestral score in 1864. Two years later, he settled down in Moscow and started to increase his fame as a composer. In the following years he would tour around Europe and even into the United States. In 1893, six days after the premiere of his last piece he
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart, as he is generally known, was baptized in a Salzburg Cathedral on the day after his birth as Joannes Chrysostomus Wolfgangus Theophilus. The first and last given names come from his godfather Joannes Theophilus Pergmayr, although Mozart preferred the Latin form of this last name, Amadeus, more often Amadé, or the Italiano Amadeo, and occasionally the Deutsch Gottlieb. Whatever the case may be, he rarely - if ever - used Theophilus in his signature. The name Chrysostomus originates from St. John Chrysostom, whose feast falls on the 27th of January. The name Wolfgang was given to him in honor of his maternal grandfather, Wolfgang Nikolaus Pertl.
Leonard Bernstein is widely known not only as one of the greatest American conductors, but also as a composer whose creativity and passion was spread over a wide range. His social and cultural influences helped shape his career into a musical icon and his music rekindled the American spirit. Above all, he will be remembered as one of the most amazing and influential musical personalities of the twentieth century.
The Pomegranate: was also known as the "fruit of the dead" and anyone who ate it was committed to stay in the Underworld.
Starting again in Brooklyn New York, quickly developing an interest in the piano, receiving guidance from his older sister. He later studied under Rubin Goldmark in Manhattan who formed Copland’s fundamentals of counterpoint and composition. During his early years of study he attended multiple classical music performances and found himself drawn to European history, and musicians. At the young age of twenty, Copland packed his bags and set out to Europe where he continued his studies at a Summer School of Music for American Students in Fountainebleau, France. By 1921 Copland had become the first full time American student of Nadia Boulanger in Paris, France. After a brief period of study that continued into the mid-1920s with the famed Boulanger, and after acquiring a deep knowledge of European artists, he sold his first composition to Durand and Sons. His early success drug him deep into the European music scene where he was able to meet many famous composers of the time, one of those people being Serge Koussevitsky who commissioned Copland to write a piece for the Boston Symphony Orchestra. The decade that followed watched as the young composer’s genius spread to every corner of the world. “Symphony for Organ and Orchestra” was composed in the year 1925 and was the key into the life of professional American music. His compositions to follow were influenced by American jazz
The CAPM is the best method of determining the cost of equity for General Mills, inc. (NYSE: GIS). Using CAPM calculations, GIS target for December 2013 is $50.60 (Reuters, 2013). If this security becomes untenable in one year’s time, then the option of increasing dividends to boost investor confidence can be explored. The APT is less accurate compared to the CAPM and the dividend growth models. However, CAPM seems to be the easiest to use. The isolation of the Beta assumptions into a single variable fits the current state of the company best when using the CAPM.
Finally, Welch (2008) established from his research that 75% of finance academics recommend using the CAPM for commercial capital budgeting purposes, 10% commend the Fama French model and only 5% recommend an APT model. Therefore, Sharpe and Lintner’s CAPM is a beneficial framework.
For instance, CAPM assumes all investors have access to the same level of information which allows them to invest in assets wisely. Also, the model assumes the variation of an asset is a tolerable tool used to ration the risk of the asset. With this assumption, CAPM assumes all investment in assets have the same percentage of risk which is relatively not real. Furthermore, the Fama-French three factor model is a model by the famous award winning Eugene Fama and also by Kenneth French to relatively explain and describe returns on stocks. The assumptions shows that observed assessments in market glitches like the scope and worth result of the assets cannot be explained by the CAPM. The CAPM is used to evaluate cost of common
The pomegranate according to myth also symbolizes the forbidden fruit which takes away the innocence of young maidens and enters them into womanhood. The fruit, which tastes good but brings the pain in life, as Church Glyn writes “Pomegranates symbolize resurrection”(Glyn, 2010). The same appears here, that the speaker believes that her daughter will also taste ...
His theory about “Universal Grammar” is very important when considering the genetic role in language acquisition. Chomsky thinks of the Universal Grammar as model that all languages follow and he says that it defines the various sections of grammar and the relation between them (Fromkin 14). Also, Chomsky believes that this innate ability controls the laws of language (Fromkin 15). “Poverty of stimulus” is an argument supporting the innateness of language where children receive a sequence of sounds and not different structures of the sentences, but they are still capable of reaching the rules, understanding them, and elaborating on these rules (Fromkin 396:397). For example, children may hear their parents saying, “give me the cup” without learning or analyzing the components of this sentence (declarative form, verb noun…etc) they are capable of using it again, but in different meaning as in “give him the tissue”. This illustrates how the genetic factors, innateness, affect language acquisition.
Hanif, M. and U. Bhatti, 2010. Validity of CAPM: Evidence from KSE. European Journal of Economics,
Cuneiform writing was an important part of history. Developing around 3500 BCE in Sumeria, this form of writing is still relevant in modern day life because it was the first form of written history and the first form of a phonogram, which caused writing to change from logograms to phonograms. Logograms are symbols that are drawn to show meaning, using the symbols to “paint a picture” while phonograms are words that have a “sound” to them. Starting as a pictograph, which means that pictures are used as symbols to tell a story, the language slowly evolved into a ideograph, which is when two symbols are put together to form an idea, this slowly evolved into what it ended as, a phonogram. Cuneiform writing also h...
The study of language development, one of the most fascinating human achievements, has a long and rich history, extending over thousands of years (Chomsky, 2000). As the nature-versus-nurture argument is inevitable to arise whenever human behaviors are discussed, it is not surprising that language experts have debated the relative influences of genetics and the environment on language development (Hulit & Howard, 2002). Among the various proposals concerning the mechanisms involved in acquiring a language, two opposing theoretical positions, the behaviorist and the nativist, are the most prominent and influential ones (Ayoun, 2003; Garton & Pratt, 1998; Owens, 2001). Due to the indefinite explanation of the exact process, the continuous interest of the inquiring people, and the sheer significance of the precise result, the controversy remains ongoing and popular. In view of the more obvious limitations of the behaviorist interpretation and the prevailing contributions of the nativist interpretation, the latter one is more rational to accept.