A Comparison of the Speeches Made by Brutus and Antony Over the Body of Caesar

1307 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Compare and contrast essay on antony and brutus's speech

A Comparison of the Speeches Made by Brutus and Antony Over the Body of Caesar

“Liberty! Freedom! Tyranny is dead!”

So claims Cinna as Caesar is fallen. Brutus his trusty friend killed

for Rome while Cassius his jealous counterpart killed over hate. The

conspirators brought his body to the market place to show the people.

Over the corpse, two speeches were made. In this essay I will compare

and contrast these two speeches.

Both of the speeches have similar have similar beginnings. Brutus

starts off with

“Romans, countrymen and lovers!”

He starts with “Romans”, because in his eyes he feels his country is

more important then his lovers, Caesar. He realises how much the crowd

feel pride in their country, so manipulates their weak spot, in the

hope that they will see his point of reason. This type of language is

formal and elaborate, and he speaks as though he is talking to the

senate. Antony, however, begins with

“Friends, Romans, countrymen”

By calling the crowd his friends, he is considering himself as though

he is on their level, rather than elevating himself like Brutus.

Through this, familiar and direct language, the crowd feels closer to

Antony, because they realise that it is like speaking to their friend,

rather than speaking to the senate, the way Brutus makes it. Antony

realises the crowd react more to a ‘friend’ rather than someone from

the senate, so continues to adhere himself to the crowd later, when he

steps down and wants them all to physically move closer, gather round.

The two speeches both end in with a pause. Brutus pauses, because he

has just asked a rhetorical question, and knows no one wil...

... middle of paper ...

... this to make sure that the conspirators did not get away with

this murder, but we know, he wasn’t just upset, but very angry, so

much so that when he was alone on the stage he said that

“Mothers shall but smile when they behold

Their infants quarter’d with the hands of war”

And also

“Let slip the dogs of war”

so we see that he wanted there to be a civil war, because of his

extreme anger over Caesar’s death.

The crucial distinction between the two speeches, are that Antony has

a clear understanding of the crowd psychology, and persuade the crowd

to see his notion very easily because of this. Brutus does not

understand what makes the crowd tick, and this characteristic is

clearly the most important feature of making Antony’s speech so

effective, and Brutus’ an unconvincing, ineffective, dire address.

Show More
Related

  • Persuasion Tactics in 'Julius Caesar': Brutus vs. Antony

    588 Words  | 2 Pages

    In Julius Caesar two men, Antony and Brutus, make two different speeches but with the same concept of ethos, logos, and pathos at Caesar's funeral. Brutus claims that it is okay that he killed Caesar and makes a speech about it. Antony is the more persuasive speaker than Brutus because he uses ethos, pathos, and logos better than Brutus. Brutus has a way with the people. He is a politician, and he knows how to get the people on his side.

    Read More

  • Comparing the Speeches of Mark Antony and Robert F. Kennedy

    1252 Words  | 3 Pages

    Mark Antony’s speech, whose aim is to counter Brutus’ speech, enlightens the crowd on the unjust murder of Caesar. Though he never directly communicates to the crowd of his feeling towards the conspirators, Antony was able to effectively convey to the crowd, through the use of verbal irony and other stylistic devices/techniques in his speech, his true views of the assassination. Moreover, Antony was able to shrewdly emphasize his belief of the undeserved assassination of Caesar through the wide use of epiphoral and anaphoral structure in his speech. Antony emphasizes the wrongdoings of Brutus and Cassius through the ingenious use of the epistrophe along with verbal irony as he notes that “I should do Brutus wrong, and Cassius wrong” (III, ii, 125). Moreover, he stresses the importance of punishi...

    Read More

  • Analysis of the Funeral Speeches of Brutus and Marc Antony from Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar

    765 Words  | 2 Pages

    It shows us that he is honourable and patriotic. Whereas, Marc Antony starts his list of three with “Friends”. This is bringing himself down to the plebeian level and he makes the crowd feel as though he is their friend even though they are separated by status and rank. This language technique is commonly know as phatic language. It is very appealing for the plebeians to hear this.

    Read More

  • Brutus vs Antony

    1056 Words  | 3 Pages

    Brutus vs Antony The most predominate and important aspect in the play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare are the speeches given to the Roman citizens by Brutus and Antony, the two main characters, following the death of Caesar. Brutus and Antony both spoke to the crowd, using the same rhetorical devices to express their thoughts. Both speakers used the three classical appeals employed in the speeches: ethos, which is an appeal to credibility; pathos, which is an appeal to the emotion of the audience; and logos, which is an appeal to the content and arrangement of the argument itself. Even though both speeches have the same structure, Antony’s speech is significantly more effective than Brutus’s. Both speakers used an ethical appeal to the crowd and established their credibility.

    Read More

  • Antony's Speech In Julius Caesar Act 2 Essay

    587 Words  | 2 Pages

    In act III, scene ii, Antony proves to himself and the conspiracy, that he has the power to turn Rome against Brutus. He deceived the conspirators with his speech during Caesar’s funeral. In this speech, Antony pulls at the heartstrings of the countryman by showing emotions and turning them against their beloved leader, Brutus. The scene takes place the day of Caesar's death. Leading up to this point the people loved Brutus because, reasonably he explains of them about Caesar's death and told them it was necessary. In Antony's speech he showed signs of hatred towards Brutus and the conspirators. He thinks for himself and deceives the people, when he explains how Brutus lied to the people . The plot depends on Antony’s speech.

    Read More

  • Brutus: A Good Leader In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar

    485 Words  | 1 Pages

    In The Tragedy Of Julius Caesar written by William Shakespeare, the leader Caesar is killed by a group of men who are close to him. He was killed because the group of men thought he was not fit to be the ruler of Rome. Brutus, a close friend of Caesar, was a part of the group. Even though Brutus betrayed Caesar, it shows he cares about others more than himself. This proves Brutus is a better leader for Rome and its people.

    Read More

  • Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    950 Words  | 2 Pages

    As a final point, Antony and Brutus both spoke at Caesar’s funeral to prove their reasoning’s to the people. Antony’s speech turned out to be the more effective one because he manipulates the words ambitious and honorable to contradict Brutus, he uses props to provide substantial evidence to the people, and his speech was more effective because it essentially persuaded the people to be on his side whereas Brutus did not convince the people of anything.

    Read More

  • Brutus' Rhetorical Strategies: Ethos, Pathos and Logos

    820 Words  | 2 Pages

    By nature, the crowd of Romans will be more concerned with their personal safety than the death of their ruler. Antony appeals to his personal experiences and friendship with Caesar in a touching, personal, primarily pathetic argument; on the other hand, Brutus appeals to the Roman citizens directly by presenting himself as their protector against Caesar, a threat to their safety and liberty. Therefore, in terms of effectiveness, Brutus reaches his audience on a much more personal and convincing level with his argument than Antony was able to with his account of his friendship and life with

    Read More

  • Comparison of the Two Speeches in Julius Caesar

    888 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...ns. This made Antony's speech more effective in the fact that he used detailed reasoning for why Caesar was not ambitious. This was why the people came to his favor in the end. The tones and rhetorical devices they used helped to capture their audience by appealing to their emotions and helping to move the views of Antony and Brutus's views across to their listeners. Comparing effectiveness and ineffectiveness of both speeches was important in determining which way the people would be swayed.

    Read More

  • Use of Rhetorical Appeals in Julius Caesar: Brutus vs Antony

    852 Words  | 2 Pages

    Because Antony ingeniously uses a plethora of logical, emotional, and credible arguments, he outshines Brutus’s speech, which lacks in verifiable evidence. Antony also seizes the power of rhetorical devices in a more effective way than Brutus to convey his message. This battle between their speeches reflects in the outcome of their war, showing the superiority of Antony’s persuasive ability. While Brutus may have been an “honorable man,” it was Antony that proved to be the more effective one.

    Read More

  • The Diction Of Mark Antony In William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    741 Words  | 2 Pages

    Mark Antony’s use of rough and sharp diction contributes to his purpose of convincing the Roman proletariat to turn against the conspirators. Antony addresses the people as “Friends, Romans, [and] countrymen,” and asks for them to “…lend [him their] ears” (III.ii.72), which all three of those words are very rough and direct, as well as

    Read More

  • Brutus: A Tragic Hero in Shakespeare´s Julius Caesar

    1445 Words  | 3 Pages

    The definition of a tragic hero is perceived as on who is neither wicked nor purely innocent, one who “is brave and noble but guilty of the tragic flaw of assuming that honorable ends justify dishonorable means”. In The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus takes the role of the tragic hero. Brutus’s honor, nobility, and self-righteousness makes him “a tragic figure, if not the hero” (Catherine C. Dominic).

    Read More

  • Mark Antony's Speech from Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    2765 Words  | 6 Pages

    Their infants quartered with the hands of war’. This shows the extent of the anarchy he will unleash on Rome. Furthermore Antony’s funeral oration is important as it follows Brutus’s speech in the play, where he has turned public opinion around to favour him, as he has been able to persuade and convince the crowds, through his rhetoric and oratory that Caesar ... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis of Mark Antony in Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare

    816 Words  | 2 Pages

    Asyndeton is a rhetorical device which eliminates conjunctions in a list. Antony uses this to convey the idea that the list he is making is not complete. It adds drama and rhythm. He opens his speech with “Friends, Romans, countrymen, lend me your ears” (III.ii.72). Anthony is addressing the crowd as these titles. They are all friendly therefore he is trying to appeal to the crowd. He eliminates the conjunctions because there are many more friendly terms he can address them as. He wants his speech to be personal and is bringing together the social gap between the plebeians [also known as peasants] and him, a person who is higher up in the Roman society. This makes the plebeians believe that he is not talking down to them, but he is talking to them as a friend. The use of asyndeton in this instance makes Antony’s speech more personable and more appealing to the crowd.

    Read More

  • Comparing Brutus And Cassius In Shakespeare's Julius Caesar

    441 Words  | 1 Pages

    Brutus and Cassius take place in a play called The Tragedy of Julius Caesar by Shakespeare”. There are many similarities and differences between Brutus and Cassius. During this play, we see their similarities when they both interact or agree with each other. In other parts of the play we see their differences when they fight or make arguments. They both share the most dramatic scenes in the play and are mostly the cause of Caesar’s death, which sums up their similarities and their differences.

    Read More

More about A Comparison of the Speeches Made by Brutus and Antony Over the Body of Caesar

Open Document