A Comparison of Two Newspaper Articles In this piece of work I will be comparing two
newspaper articles about the same event. During the course of this
essay I will discuss how this event is ‘represented’ and identify any
‘biases.
Representation is when you show or present something through the
media. Bias is judgemental, and is also when a writer puts their own
opinion rather than facts.
In The Daily Mirror learning is represented by saying “learning can be
fun”, whereas in the Independent learning is represented by saying
“pupils play to learn”. In The Daily Mirror the writer has not
included much information about the course, and also has made quite a
lot of negative comments, for example the write has put a subtitle in
the middle of the page saying “Tomfoolery”; this simply means that the
course is about messing about, whereas in the Independent the writer
has included all the information about the course that the readers
will be interested in.
The writer of the Independent has made positive comments, for example
he has written “it is more of a relaxed atmosphere.
Prince Henry of Portugal, more commonly known as Henry the Navigator, and Zheng He, a successful Chinese admiral, were both extremely accomplished men throughout the 14th and 15th centuries. During this era, many accomplished explorers ventured out into the ocean and discovered new lands, two of the most important men being Henry the Navigator and Zheng He. Although both men came from different backgrounds, their contrasting societies and structures affected the way in which they regarded economic and political expansion and also their contact with other cultures. Societies like the Chinese and Portuguese had many cultural differences such as their different religions. The Chinese practiced neo-Confucianism whereas the Portuguese were Christians which was one of the many purposes of their exploration, to spread Christianity. There were also many cultural similarities between the two societies such as their long lasting histories and their explorer’s curiosity to seek out to new lands, which resulted the two societies in having different views on economic and political expansion and contact with other cultures. Both Confucian and Christian ideologies favored those who worked over the wealthy. Thus, to a larger extent, the structures and values of a society have an extensive impact on the way people view economic and political expansion and contact with other cultures.
There is a tremendous amount of things in life that every student at Golden West College should know how to do. High schools do not offer classes that teach their students how to do certain things in life after high school, and instead teach them things that become useless. Therefore, once these students move on to college they think that they know everything that they need to know. However, that is not exactly true for a majority of them. In the article, “How to Make It in College, Now That You’re Here” Brian O’Keeney discusses many different techniques to help freshmen, and any other students in college that need the assistance. O’Keeney’s article is separated into three main sections to help the reader focus on specific things: good grades, organization, and mental health. Personally, I believe that organization and mental health is what students need to be focusing on the most. Once entering college there are certain things that some students do not know, and it greatly affects their mental health. For example, my best friend and I just graduated high school this year, and once we entered college, we felt lost because of the things we did not know how to do. We did not know how to dot some of the most important things: pay our bills, make sure we received our financial aid, how to do our taxes, etc… All Golden West College students should be required to take two semesters of learning how to do some of the most important everyday things, such as: how to balance a checkbook, how to do taxes, what a mortgage is, and many more things.
In contemporary society the attacks on itself are everywhere. The internet is a collection of articles poking fun at the trends of society, and more specifically, the actions of the youth. Shortcuts are used by the students of modernized societies, and a vile habit of complacency is shown in the article “Girl Moved To Tears by Of Mice and Men Cliffs Notes”, a satirical composition of mock journalism, that illustrates the apathy and laziness of a student. The article in The Onion utilizes incisive adverbs, litotes and understatement, and selection of detail to showcase the laziness of a student using the Cliffs notes.
Rosencrantz and Guildenstern Are Dead is a tragic comedy by Tom Stoppard, which focuses on the adventures of two minor characters from Shakespeare’s famous play Hamlet. The Rover also known as The Banish'd Cavaliers, is a romantic or restoration comedy by Aphra Behn, about a rakish naval captain, who falls in love with a young woman, who plans on marrying him. Although both these plays are comedies, there are significant differences in the theme, style, setting, and the whole feel they give an audience.
The first Editorial was against universal health care. They felt that if someone needs healthcare for something, then they will pay for it, and that the rich deserve better healthcare than the poor. The author, Thomas Szasz, used mainly pathos and loaded words to convince the reader of his claims. For example, Szasz (2009) stated, "The idea that every life is infinitely precious and therefore everyone deserves the same kind of optimal medical care is a fine religious sentiment and moral ideal. As political and economic policy, it is vainglorious delusion" (p. 1). This shows that much of Szasz persuasion comes from emotional appeal, not using real facts and
An analysis of Mycerinus and Kha-merer-nebty II and Augustus of Primaporta, reveals that there are many similarities, but also many differences between these two pieces of sculpture. These similarities and differences are found in the subject, style, and function of both works of art.
The Los Angeles Times. 4. What is the difference between a.. Cline, Francis X. 2002-10-05. " Widening Fears, Few Clues As 6th Death Is Tied to Sniper".
Comparing Two Sources There are disagreements and agreements between source A and source B. Source A was from a report written by a journalist Humphrey Tyler, who worked for a South African magazine. The report was written later on the same day that the shooting occurred. Source B was from an English newspaper, published the day after the shooting. Source A and source B both agree and disagree with each other over different things.
The purpose of the article I reviewed by Lykeridou, Gourounti, Deltsidou, Lautradis, and& Vaslamatzis (2009) was to examine women’s level of depression, perceived anxiety, and overall stress related to infertility while receiving fertility treatments. It w as hypothesized that the etiology of an infertility diagnoses wouldwill affect female’s psychological vulnerability. The variables that were looked at in the study were infertility diagnoses and psychological disturbances. The levels of infertility diagnoses used in the research were male factor infertility, female factor infertility, mixed, and idiopathic infertility. The various levels of psychological disturbances included depression, perceived anxiety, and overall fertility related stress.
The video and newspaper article are quite very much the same because they both lead to the same conclusion, the viewer ends up thinking about themselves and other people. The footage and article give both views from each party, the doctor and health reporter and the view from a teenager.
The effective use of rhetoric can spur people into action for worthy causes, bring about positive health changes, and even persuade one to finish a college education. In contrast, like most things in life, what can be used for good can also be used in a negative way to elicit emotions such as outrage, fear, and panic. This type of rhetoric often uses fallacious statements in an appeal to emotion which complicates the matter even more as the emotions are misdirected. Unfortunately, the daily newspapers are filled with numerous examples of fallacious statements. Within the past week, the following five examples appeared in the New York Times and USA Today. The examples included statements that demonstrated scapegoating, slippery slope, ad hominem, straw man, line-drawing, arguments from outrage, and arguments from envy.
Every story that makes the front page a paper has to go through a “test” where the editor of that newspaper company decides whether the story is good enough for the front page. The editor makes the decision of whether or not the story is news worthy. The editor uses various different values to help him/her in their decision of what actually goes on the front page. Sometimes this judgment by the editor can be based solely on whether or not the story is going to grasp a lot of readers’ attention which would then boost newspaper sales. Other times the value system that is used is not so vague and meaningless. Some of these values that make stories news worthy are: its news values, prominence of the person or issue being reported on, the amount of impact the story has, whether or not there’s conflict, the novelty of the story, the timeliness, the proximity to the main area of circulation for that newspaper and the relevance and usefulness of the story. One key note is that these values have no hierarchic order and are based on the personal judgment of the editor of that paper. I will analyze three of the major newspapers in New York and point out the values that the editor of these particular newspapers used to decide which story was going to be the top story on Saturday, September 5th. The three newspapers are: The Journal News, New York Post and the Daily News.
Overall, it is clear that there is a contrast between both of the newspapers. It could be argued that the production of newspapers is mainly to fulfil the readers expectations, for example, the readers of ‘The Sun’ expect to read a dramatic story which is why the editors select specific words and images, whereas the ‘The Guardian’ readers may prefer more of an intellectual debate (Schlesinger et all, 2010). They both tell the same story but in different ways, consequently it is up to the reader to decide which they believe or prefer.
For my compare and contrast essay, I have decided to compare two magazines in the financial and business world of entrepreneurs. The name of the first magazine is ” Small business opportunities” and the second magazine is “Entrepreneurs – Be your own boss”
I intend to conduct research into the widespread fall of newspaper sales, and how the Internet is causing this, if it is even. Furthermore I will branch out into whether the journalists themselves are to blame, or simply because of citizens’ lack of interest in news, whether it is in the newspaper or the television. I will also investigate how people read their news; do they purchase a broadsheet? What interests them? How much does the Internet take the place of the newspaper? These are all questions and more that I intend to research thoroughly, perhaps with the help of the general public.