A Comparison Of The Jim Crow Laws In Harper Lee's To Kill A Mockingbird

2486 Words5 Pages

Forced from their country and stripped of their rights, African Americans were brought to the nation for nothing more than tools for labor. They were not treated fairly and suffered a great deal as each day slowly passed on. Yet, they fought hard and rebelled standing for their own human rights clenching the little chances they had. Sadly, even winning the rights they deserved was not enough for them to be treated fair. Still forced through harsh conditions from then till now, the battle for their equality will never size. Harper Lee’s to Kill a Mockingbird reflected the harsh conditions caused by the Jim crow laws in the early 1900s that were thought to have died out a long time ago but now African Americans are faced with a crisis that is …show more content…

Just as the Jim Crow Laws snatched happiness away from newly freed slaves and showed how unwilling people can be to change, Tom Robinson walked into the trial knowing he was a dead man. Based on his skin color, black, his fate was decided even with large amounts of evidence supporting his innocence given by Atticus Finch. Atticus addresses the obvious issue by saying, “There’s something in our world that makes men lose their heads- they couldn’t be fair if they tried. In our courts, when it’s a white man’s word against a black man’s word, the white always wins. They’re ugly, but these are the facts of life” (Lee 252), angrily stating that he understand they are fighting a losing battle but he cannot stand for this injustice and like very few will stand up for the right thing with not race involved. The court room itself showcased the similarity by separating the blacks in whites in the room just as it was done in public areas in the south. Atticus states during the trial, "The older you grow the more of it you’ll see. The one place where a man ought to get a square deal is in a courtroom, be he any color of the rainbow, but people have a way of carrying their resentments right into a jury box”(Lee, 295), how all should be equal in a courtroom and facts should be used not prejudice. This strongly support the case of how the jury took skins color above all …show more content…

All three antagonize majority of African American people because of being colored. Just as Mrs. Dubose in to Kill a Mockingbird shouts at Jem and Scout, “Your fathers no better than the niggers and trash he works for!” (Lee 117), displays the value set in this time for black people by comparing them to trash. Just like the “new Jim Crow” targets poor black people or younger teens to arrest for minor crimes because not only are they easier targets they are looked down upon in society. Back in the past, being racist was not a crime so many did it without blanketing their resolve but now, racism is a punishable offense yet why is there still racial profiling and prejudice without many getting punished for it? Alexander Michelle declares, “"As the rules of acceptable discourse changed, segregationists distanced themselves from an explicitly racist agenda. They developed instead the racially sanitized rhetoric of "cracking down on crime" (Page 43), showcasing how the term racial profiling is covered up by use the term of cracking down on crime. She supports this by stating the fact that 5% of the world 's population, the United States now holds 25% of the world 's prisoners, winning it the dubious title of the world 's leading jailer. The rate at which we lock up our citizens now surpasses every other country that has

Open Document