A Closer Look at Date Rape

931 Words2 Pages

“Feminism has not prepared them for this,” states Camille Paglia in her essay “Rape: A Bigger Danger than Feminists Know.” The “them” in Paglia’s statement is referring to women, and she is discussing the topic of date rape. Susan Jacoby, on the other hand, writes in her article “Common Decency,” that feminism is not responsible for the rising cases of date rape, but that it is the men who are at fault. Paglia’s argument is insightful and accurate, but Jacoby’s writing is flawed and not well-researched. Paglia includes all rhetorical appeals and persuasive techniques, while Jacoby lacks in some departments of persuasiveness and fills the gap with logical fallacies. Comparing both of these papers will help the reader see why Paglia’s argument is researched, relevant, and important.

Paglia’s argument is immediately striking and grabs the viewer’s attention. She uses all of the rhetorical appeals in her paper and presents a strong argument against feminism, and for female self-awareness. Before her essay, Paglia establishes her ethos, and confirms to the reader that all her points are well-researched and true. In the introduction to the author, it lists all of Paglia’s accomplishments, books, and careers. It presents a strong sense of ethos for her readers and lets them know exactly how experienced she is. Paglia’s essay is also loaded with logos. She presents real-life stories, examples, and statistics that all help to prove her point. After her ethos is presented, the examples of logos seem to present much more power and authority in the paper, and convinces the reader that these are all true and apply to her argument. The third rhetorical appeal, pathos, is presented throughout every paragraph. Not only does Paglia p...

... middle of paper ...

...bout her experience with her ex-boyfriend who she initially wanted to have sex with to make up for another nasty boyfriend. She eventually realizes she does not want to have intercourse with her ex-boyfriend, and he left the building. This may invoke a bit of sympathy for this author and help the reader get a closer look at her personal life, but after the example, she writes that he does not deserve gratuitous praise for his actions (512). She immediately loses sympathy the reader once had for her at the beginning, and it hurts her pathos. Jacoby includes two of the three rhetorical appeals, but the ethos and pathos are applied poorly.

Works Cited

Loiselle, Marci, and Wayne R. Fuqua. "Alcohol's Effects on Women's Risk Detection in a Date-Rape Vignette." Journal of American College Health 55.5 (2007): 261-266. Academic Search Complete. Web. 20 Apr. 2014.

More about A Closer Look at Date Rape

Open Document