The realist worldview of North Korea characterizes North Korea as a coalesced form of belligerence that must be dealt with through American containment and deterrence. Because of the rising fear produced by North Korea’s growing nuclear power and radical behavior toward the U.S., realists support using threats and pressure to force North Korea to shut down its nuclear program if necessary. A realization of true realism would include recognizing diplomacy as the major means of coming to an accord with North Korea in order to combat the hostility that has developed both from external and internal factors within North Korea. However, because American foreign policy and attitudes toward international security is predominantly realist, the U.S. provides its allies in East Asia with military supplies and maintains troops within the borders of the allied nations such as Japan and South Korea. As a result of this realist perception, surrounding countries such as North Korea and China also maintain a predominantly realist approach toward foreign affairs and continue to increase and modernize their military and military related technological advancements. Furthermore, U.S. influence in East Asia encourages its allies to maintain an isolated approach towards North Korea and remain uncooperative. President Obama’s foreign policy continues to maintain bilateral alliances with Japan and Taiwan which discourages the creation of multilateral agreements between North Korea and countries in East Asia. This discouragement has caused the proliferation of t...
The recent turn of events in North Korea with its alleged admission to possessing nuclear weapon has created nervous tension in the Far East region. Specifically, North Korea has recently transformed the existing bilateral U.S.-ROK alliance into an awkward triangular ROK-U.S.-DPRK dynamic, significantly complicating the previous bilateral relationships amongst the three as well as making these relationships more difficult to manage. We will trace the development of these relations, to gain a better insight into this long standing conflict and to assess better the future implications surrounding these tensions.
Bellamy, Paul. 2010. "The Last Cold War? Thoughts on Resolving Korea's Sixty Year-old Family Feud." Journal Of Human Security (RMIT Training Pty Ltd Trading As RMIT Publishing) 6, no. 2: 1-6. International Security & Counter Terrorism Reference Center, EBSCOhost (accessed May 18, 2014).
North Korea, formally known as the Democratic Peoples Republic of Korea (DPRK), is a relic of the Cold War and the world’s last remaining totalitarian Stalinist dictatorship. Arguably the most secretive state in the world, North Korea poses a unique set of challenges to the world, especially to its democratic and capitalist neighbor, South Korea, formally known as the Republic of Korea (ROK). As one of the last remnants of the Cold War era, North Korea remains an anomaly of the international system due to its unpredictable nature and disregard for international norms. With the recent bombardment of the South Korean Island of Yeongpyong and the sinking of the warship Cheonan, tensions between the two Koreas are at the lowest point since the end of the Korean War. The question remains regarding the direction South Korea must take if it hopes to achieve lasting peace on the peninsula and whether the goal of re-unification can be attained in our lifetime. Past South Korean engagement policies such as the Nordpolitik and the ‘Sunshine Policy’ have shown to elicit some positive effects on improving relations. However, they failed to reduce the military tension that exists on the peninsula as the North continued to pursue a nuclear weapons program during their implementation. The current administration has taken a more hard-lined approach but this too has proven to only further increase tensions as evidenced by the recent provocations. For South Korea to successfully formulate a set of policies that would elicit a positive response from North Korea, South Korea must carefully evaluate its past policy successes while also attempting to understand the underlying reasoning behind North Korean behavior.
“In addition, State Minister Kiuchi mentioned the importance of North Korea refraining from further provocations and taking steps for denuclearization, and of all countries fulfilling Security Council resolutions, along with seeking the understanding and cooperation of the ASEAN member countries for the resolution of the abductions issue. Furthermore, State Minister Kiuchi explained the importance of achieving concrete results in UN Security Council reform this year, the 70th anniversary of the founding of the
It was the October 9 2006 North Korea’s nuclear test, actually the first, that triggered the various reactions and actions from the international nations. USA led these nations in trying to strongly control the North Korea nuclear program. This test has also forced them to scramble to find suitable solutions sanctions that suites them. This action by international nations creates room for discussions and various arguments as to why so many nations are after the denuclearization program and what their intentions might be especially when thought of from an economical point of view. Despite the actions of North Ko...
The regime’s greatest flaw is, perhaps, human nature. For as many South Korea’s earnestly support cooperation and global denuclearization, there will be other nation-states unwilling to give up their ‘right to deterrence.’ Rightly or wrongly, South Korea’s own policy-structure demonstrates a dependency on a liberal school of thought, guiding them to other means of prestige, but their neighbors in the global sphere are not so willing to place faith outside of sheer military superiority.
Once the Soviet Union collapsed in the early 1990s the bipolar world order disintegrated with it, leaving the United States as the sole global superpower. Yet, the communism was not the only concern of Americans. In the early 1980s, this capitalist power already started sensing an overcoming threat of the international terrorism, which led to the emergence of a new group of enemies, namely, the rogue states. These countries are seen as a danger to the new unipolar world. The United States of America assumed a responsibility to contain these states and/or transform them into successfully functioning democracies. Currently this is being done by military interventions and sanctions. However, one special state arises – North Korea . It is the most aggressive of the group, but enjoys the most diplomatic approach. This paper’s aim is to understand why North Korea is receiving a different treatment compared to its comrade dictator states. This will be done as follows. Firstly, the definition(s) of the rogue states will be provided. Secondly, the critique of the American standpoint will be given. Finally, the reasons for the treatment of the DPRK will be addressed.
Nanto, Dick K., and Mark E. Manyin. "China–North Korea Relations." North Korean Review 7.2 (2011): 94-101. Print.
On the morning of October 16, 1962, President John F. Kennedy received confirmation that Russia has placed missiles and atomic weapons on the island of Cuba. The ensuing 13 days would become an extremely intense and dangerous period for the American people. Fast forward 51 years and it would seem as though the American government is dealing with a very similar set of circumstances. The North Korean government has embarked on a very serious journey to develop and usenuclear weapons,with the primary target being South Korea and the United States bases within that country. Comparing these two events is difficult because the situation in Korea has not been resolved. However, by using the Cuban missile crisis as a blueprint, the United States government can avoid potential pitfalls and avoid entering in another armed conflict with the unpredictable North Korean government.