Analysis Of Erikson's Eight Ages Of Man

1198 Words3 Pages

Erikson’s Eight Ages of Man is a summary of what Erikson believes to be the eight most essential phase’s man experiences throughout the lifespan. These eight phases include: Basic trust versus mistrust, Autonomy versus shame and doubt, initiative versus guilt, industry versus inferiority, identity versus role confusion, intimacy versus isolation, generativity versus stagnation, and ego integrity versus despair. Erikson defines the stages as being concrete and states that each stage must be achieved for any human being to fully develop the capacity to thrive later in his/her life. I agree with the stages, as Erikson defines them in his article. The only construct that I disagree with is his idea that each stage is concrete and absolute. That each stage must first be complete and achieved for any individual to develop and continue to the next developmental stage. I pose the question, if one stage is not completed, and the individual does not “fully develop” that construct or virtue, but still continues throughout the lifespan does this mean that the individual cannot still develop the virtues, or complete life with a sense of purpose and completion? Erikson’s first …show more content…

This stage is usually associated with the adolescent age. In this stage Erikson describes the ability or in some cases, inability to develop a sense of self-identity. Erikson says, “adolescents in this stage are now primarily concerned with how they appear in the eyes of others, rather than how they feel they are, more concerned with their connection to the roles and skills cultivated in previous stages of development.” (Erikson, pg. 289) He also defines this stage as an important development of the change between adolescent years and adulthood years. In this stage one begins to search for the values and attributes which define themselves, while noting any attributes that they do not identify with, and in some cases disagree with on a moral

Open Document