As per Peter Singer, we need a insurgency in the way we people view and treat different species, particularly non human creatures. He needs us to perceive creatures as good equivalents. This thought is applicable to the american people, open in light of the fact that, of the way plant homestead creatures are consistently maltreated. In this paper I will demonstrate that the utilitarian moral argument proposed by Peter Singer in all animals are equal is truly flawless. I will inspect some of the objection against Singer 's position and weigh whether Peter Singers response to the objection. Emulating this I will contend that Singer 's origination of creatures interest, which is a fundamental piece of his contention, is correct. I will further contend for Singer that there are genuine reason for considering these investments to be ethically equal to interest. I will contend that giving more prominent good attention to your own specie without considering other specie is a "speciesist" act. Peter Singer presents his defense for equality of animals when he said,
“Racists violate the principle of equality by giving greater weight to the interests of members of their own race when there is clash between their interests and the interests of those of another race. Racists of European descent typically have not accepted that pain matters as much when it is felt by Africans, For example, as when when it is felt by Europeans. Similarly those I would call “speciesists” give their own species when there is
clash between their interests and the interest of those other species. (597-580)’’
I agree with Peter Singer here because, Peter singer utilized the thought of racism and speciesism to is reinforce his contention...
... middle of paper ...
...nue to eat factory farmed meat, we are assuming the assaults speciesism should head on which is immoral hypocrites . The similar equality between animals and humans gives us no decision however to find that all animals are equivalent.
In Conclusion, people have to "extend to other species the basic principle of equality that most of us recognize should be extended to all members of our own species". People and a lot of animals are able to experience pain and misery. Thusly, people and a lot of animals have interest in surviving. The interest of each being ought to be considered.To participate in prejudice or in speciesism is to disregard the essential guideline of equality. Peter singer’s argument were strong enough about eating factory farmed meat to the extent that if people continue to eat factory meat after knowing all this
should be considered an hypocrite.
Need Writing Help?
Get feedback on grammar, clarity, concision and logic instantly.Check your paper »
- "In "All Animals Are Equal," Singer argues for the equality of all animals, on the basis of an argument by analogy with various civil rights movements, on the part of human beings. How does this argument go exactly, and what is Singer's precise conclusion. Is his argument successful. Why or why not. If you think it is successful, raise a residual potentially damaging objection, and respond on Singer's behalf (i.e., as a proponent of the position). And if not, how far does the argument go and/or how might it be improved.... [tags: Equity, Speciesism, Argument]
2024 words (5.8 pages)
- ... This means that every being can suffer, therefore there is no excuse for the suffering to not be taken into account. Even if the suffering is different, it does not change the fact that it is suffering. He adds that an object that cannot suffer or have any feeling whatsoever, is not included. This may mean that an object that is not living cannot be compared to an animal. In addition, Singer recognizes that it is better for scientists to experiment on animals than on humans. He says, “Normal adult human beings have mental capacities that will, in certain circumstances, lead them to suffer more than animals would in the same circumstances” (Singer, 59).... [tags: equality between humans and animals]
1301 words (3.7 pages)
- In his paper “All Animals Are Equal”, Philosopher Peter Singer argues for an egalitarian view on the concept treatment for animals. This paper will explore the implications of his argument and seek to counter an objection one may have to his view. His argument bases itself in the basic principle of equality. The argument is that the basic principle of equality states that the interest of all being must be taken into account and considered as equal to all other beings To defend his position Singer cites the basic principle of equality as a way to show why in-egalitarian views that are morally wrong can be explained as morally wrong.... [tags: Human, Morality, Ethics, Utilitarianism]
738 words (2.1 pages)
- Animal rights are an important topic to discuss and review. The trouble is the vast diversity of how people see humans and animals and how they are different and yet the same. Animals are in every aspect of our lives in how they are utilized to make our lives easier, to sustain us, or as a pet. Unfortunately, the line of animals and humans blurs as the widely known belief that we are a derivation of an animal and we should treat them as we would ourselves. This viewpoint, however, can be taken to an extreme as we see pets that can be pampered quite a bit.... [tags: Autonomy, humans, animals]
1496 words (4.3 pages)
- Men have thought themselves to be the superior species for a long time, but Peter Singer brings a new perspective on the topic in his essay entitled Speciesism and Moral Status. Singer’s new way of thinking of it states that determining morals status requires the comparison between the cognitive abilities of humans and nonhumans. The main points he focusses on in his essay are cognitive capacities between animals and humans with severe mental retardation, religion affecting human’s beliefs of superiority, and finally the ability to suffer and how similar humans and nonhumans are.... [tags: Thought, Psychology, Mind, Human]
736 words (2.1 pages)
- Animal rights are defined in the Merriam-Webster Dictionary as “rights (as to fair and humane treatment) regarded as belonging fundamentally to all animals.” But what do they mean by “all animals”. Is there a different protocol for every specie. Is there an invisible line drawn to state what rights animals have. You have to decide. Animals have played a role in society since evolution began. First, animals were used for food, their skins were used for clothing and shelter, and their bones for tools.... [tags: Animal rights, Animal welfare]
1667 words (4.8 pages)
- Meat is considered to be a go-to meal for many at breakfast, lunch, and dinner. What most do not think about is where their burgers or chicken wings are really coming from. Animals live dangerous lives in enclosures and cages, where they are forced to eat and sleep against their own will. Peter Singer discusses some of these issues in his article, “Animal Liberation” and how this freedom will take time and commitment. Singer talks about the harsh treatments of these farm animals and the factory farming that goes on behind the scenes.... [tags: Equality for Animals]
2953 words (8.4 pages)
- ... These ideas have been justified by philosophers using ideas similar to Kantian philosophies ie. That only human beings are rational autonomous and self-conscious. Other rationalisations which support this idea include the concept that only human beings have rights. McCloskey 1979 makes the argument that “in order for an individual to have a right to something it must be able to claim that thing for itself”. In opposition to this idea, some authors have argue that human behaviour which discriminates against animals is “speciesism” a term coined by Richard Ryder in his book ‘Experiments on Animals’ (1971) and later used by Peter Singer in his 1975 book ‘Animal Liberation’ (Fjellstrom, 2002... [tags: animal welfare philosophy, population]
1482 words (4.2 pages)
- Most human beings are inherently speciesist; meaning that they believe one species is superior to another. (Singer, Peter. Animal Liberation. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, 2009. 6. Print.) It can be argued that this is just an expansion of the hardship of human equality, and just as we were once desensitized to others race or gender, we are now doing the same to animals. In addition, we don’t give much thought to what goes on beyond our own little bubble. We don’t care how our food got there; we just want it.... [tags: Animal Rights]
493 words (1.4 pages)
- “The notion that human life is sacred just because it is human life is medieval”, this was written by Peter Singer in his book Animal Liberation. Animals are all over, whether it is at home as companions, at the circus as entertainment, or in our closets as clothing. Citizens of the United States are aware that the medicines we are to take have to be approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), but many of us have been ignorant to how exactly the majority of these medicines are approved and who are the testing dummies that are used to come up with these medication.... [tags: ethical, legal, scientific]
1230 words (3.5 pages)
- Analysis Of John Donne 's ' The Great Chain Of Being '
- Evaluating Neuropsychological Evidence From Humans That Suggests That Declarative And Non Declarative Memories Are Formed
- Oedipus : A Tragic Hero
- Love Based Marriage Is The Best Reason For Marriage
- Analysis Of George Fitzgerald 's ' The Great Gatsby '
- Lincoln 's First Inaugural Address