Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Elizabeth 1 leadership
Revolution in Russia in the late 19th century
Revolution in Russia in the late 19th century
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Elizabeth 1 leadership
The Sixteen century was difficult times for both England and Russia; each having
leaders that experienced family violent and obstacles to their rights to the throne. Queen
Elizabeth I (r. 1558-1603), her mother was killed when she was young, and she was
considered illegitimate for the throne. She finally inherited the throne after the bad
leaderships of her cousin Lady Grey, and that of her half-sister Mary I. Her inheritance
was bankrupt and secondary to Spain in Europeans’ affairs. Having a Royal Queen as it
leader, the English had doubts about their future, but Queen Elizabeth proved valiant by
focusing on the interests of her subjects, and the English defense against Spain in the
Spaniard Armada. Like England, the Russian had a Tsar, Ivan IV (r. 1547-1584) who
experienced the death of his father at the age of three. With struggle between the Russian
leading nobility; having different views on crowning the young Prince, Ivan IV was
finally given the crown at the age of sixteen, in 1547.
One of the social changes in England occurred in 1558, when Philip II decided to
invade England due to her interference with the Spanish New World. With a female
leader, the English were cautious, although they had the world best mariners, and
ships maneuverability, yet it was the brilliant mind catching speech (Queen Elizabeth
Armada Speech) that lifted the spirits of her subjects to defeat the Spanish troops. Unlike
Queen Elizabeth defensiveness against England’s enemies, Ivan IV was a ferocious
attacker, who planned and annexed Tatar Khans, Kazan, and Western Siberia. The
Foreign policies exercised by Ivan IV were unsuccessful; he aimed to gain control of ...
... middle of paper ...
...nterests. Russia was more of the invader type, who went to war against its
neighbors with aim to gain territories for trading and commerce. Europeans advanced
their military knowledge in the Seventeenth century, nation implemented new tactics
against each other to destroy infantry. Demand for social change also started upheavals
around Europe. Lower classes were gaining wealth and wanted to be respected and hear
in public matters. Both England and Russia had some kind of social revolutions, but I can
say it was England that succeeded in meeting the needs of the people compared to Russia
fallen in the hand of Tsar Peter I (the Great), who built an entire new city to isolate his
centralized government from any opposition, and economically England was doing well
than many Europe countries specifically better than that of Russia.
Peter preferred to live comfortably, and didn’t have a need for extravagance as much as Louis XIV did. But that didn’t mean he didn’t think big. Peter’s main goals were to modernize Russia, and to make it a major European power—a force to be reckoned with—and also to gain control of the church. He tried to achieve these in many different ways. One way he attempted to make Russia more powerful was by westernizing the country. He traveled all over Western Europe, learning about the culture, more modern practices and way of ...
The European monarchs and rulers of the 17th and 18th centuries wanted to increase their power both domestically and globally by adding to their territories and populations. Both in merging their power internally and expanding their power externally, they employed three features of state-building: control, extraction, and integration. In the late 1700s, both the Industrial revolution and French revolution of 1789 strengthened the idea that Europeans were different from the rest of the world. It also strengthened that Europeans were “succeeding” promptly while the rest of the world seemed to be declining, that Europeans were somehow extraordinary and better than the rest.” (Robert Marks page 10).
England and the Austrian, Habsburg Empire were both influenced by many of the same pressures during the 16th, 17th and 18th centuries. Each nation witnessed segments of their society demand religious freedom, and each struggled with the issue of Monarchial government and who possessed the right to the throne. These were the pressures faced by both nations and, though there were similarities between the issues, each nation took a very different approach to solving their problems. England would emerge from the 18th century capable of leading its citizens through a form of representative government; the Austrian, Habsburg Empire would find itself marginalized and absorbed by surrounding nations due to lack of unity and single purpose. England was successful at resolving its crises because, through compromise, it developed a stronger central government in the form of Constitutional Monarchy.
By the Glorious Revolution of the 17th century, England was already miles ahead of their European brethren. William of Orange and his wife, Mary, took over the English throne after King James fled to France on the heels of his failed attempts to rul...
In 1589, marked the end of 70 years of devastating religious civil war, and historians started to see the emergence of the absolute leader or absolute monarch. During this religious civil war, France was most severely hit. At the end of the civil war historians begin to see the rise of a new King, Henry IV, who put an end to any future religious civil wars by stating that everyone in France would be granted religious ...
Beginning in the 1600s, one of the main concepts for England, France, and Spain at the time was mercantilism. These were the three most powerful and blooming countries at the time. Starting from the earliest years as the late 1500s, and continuing on, all three countries were soon to battle for claim of the new land. Only one country could triumph. Despite success, even the strongest can become the weakest.
Isaacs, Lynn. “ Queen Isabella I of Spain.” Prof. Pavlac’s Women’s History Site. King’s College, 31 May 2008. Web. 1 May 2014.
Before Peter the Great took control of Russia, it differed drastically from the states and societies that lye further west. During the seventeenth century, Russia was a highly firm and restricted society; one in which people did not have rights and/or control of their own lives. Around the area of Moscow, Peter inherited a huge territorial aggregation. At the time, Western Europe was sparsely populated, and the level of economic development was too low for European standards. It was practically impossible to give an accurate approximation of what the population in Russia actually was, but it was estimated to be around 10 to 12 million during the late seventeenth century. The government prior to Peter the Great was in effect of promising the landlords a secure supply of peasants by the extension of serfdom.
Queen Elizabeth I was said to be one of the best rulers of England. Unlike rulers before her, she was a Protestant and not a Catholic. She was not stupid though. She did go to church and did everything that Catholics did to prevent getting her head cut off under the rules of her sister Mary. Elizabeth was very young when she came to rule. She was only 17 years old when her sister Mary died and she took over.
During the Age of Exploration, countries of Spain and England were rivalries. Spain, after Columbus made his discoveries, went on to explore and colonize lands in Mexico and Peru. With the riches that it obtained, Spain overwhelmed England with its powerful navy, but failed to do so because of the strong will and nationalism of the English explorers. Sir Walter Raleigh was among these brave men and soon became a distinguished member of the English society. He was favored by Queen Elizabeth but was still not satisfied with his glamorous life. Raleigh had wanted to achieve glory for England so that its superiority would exceed that of Spain’s.
defended its’ crown against British rule. This war had a great impact on the people of each country.
Mary Tudor became queen of England after she had Lady Jane Grey, known as the nine-day queen, executed (Lindbuchler). She came to the throne on July 19, 1553, and ruled for five dismal years (“Mary the Queen”). Because she was an advocate for the Roman Catholic Church, Mary never gained the support of her countrymen or nobles (Lindbuchler). At first, she seemed to be able to compromise and moved slowly toward religion; she even allowed her brother Edward to be buried with a Protestant service. But she despised the fact that her father broke away from the Church and always intended to return Catholicism to England (“Queen Bloody Mary”).
The future queen was raised like any other royal child. She received tutoring and did very well in music and languages. She spent some time in the care of her stepmother, Catherine Parr, after her father's death in 1547. Catherine made sure that Elizabeth was educated to the highest of standards. There was tension between Catherine and her new husband, Thomas Seymour, that led Elizabeth to return to the royal estate in Hatfield. Thomas Seymour was found guilty of conspiracy and executed. It was found out that he wanted to wed Elizabeth to gain power.
Through her speech, Queen Elizabeth inspired her people to fight for the country of England against the Spaniards. Queen Elizabeth persuaded the English troops to defend their country with rhetoric devices such as diction, imagery, and sentence structure to raise their morale and gain loyalty as a woman in power.
Throughout history there have been many revolutions between the population of a country and its government. People always want change, usually in the directions of freedom, peace and equality and in the lead up to the 1917 Russian revolution; there were a variety of social, political and economic situations that all played their part.