In this case study, the two partners of GBB are the Engagement Quality Review Partner (EQRP) and the audit partner of LPL respectively. As they are a part of the same firm, the Audit partner, who found a material misstatement which changed the profit figures and which he should have been communicated to LPL, decided to talk internally in his firm where he was told by his senior to cover up the mistake done by their consulting staff by changing the accounting policy itself and give an unqualified report for their own personal benefits
In this whole scenario, the following ,fundamental ethical principles are being violated:
Integrity
This principle puts an obligation on all assurance practitioners to be straightforward and honest in
…show more content…
In this case, Jane is making Gordan violating the principle of objectivity by trying to influence his decision of disclosing the wrong variance calculation for saving the reputation, market share and profits of their firm which will be affected if he’ll disclose it .
Professional Competence and Due Care
This principle imposes the obligation on assurance practitioners to maintain professional knowledge and skill at the level required to ensure that a client receives competent assurance services based on current developments in practice, legislation and techniques and act diligently and in accordance with the standards issued by the External PES 1 (Revised) 8 Reporting Board, the New Zealand Auditing and Assurance Standards Board and the New Zealand Accounting Standards
…show more content…
Gordan should follow the fundamental ethical principles and professionalism towards his auditing engagement. He should keep his professional scepticism hat on all the time and should have the ability to make his own decisions regarding his audit findings.
He should keep the matters confidential in first place but then if by chance he discusses with anybody, he should be objective enough to not get influenced by his seniors or anybody and go on the wrong path. He was wrong on his part discussing the material misstatement with Jane rather than directly informing his client LPL. Maintaining his integrity, he would have either truthfully discussed the matter directly with LPL management so that they can work over it to correct their profit or should have given a qualified report stating about the misstatement and inflated profits due to the large unfavourable labour variance which was recorded as an asset.
Being objective, he should not be scared to give an adverse report about the unfavorable variance which was miscalculated by the new system recommended by GBB only and would have decrease the profits already declared by LPL
Andrea may decide not to inform the limited partners about the misrepresentation of Skyline Views’s financial statements; to avoid conflict, this decision permits Ed to deceive the company and limited partners. In addition, by deciding not to inform the limited partners of Ed’s deceit, Andrea would be disregarding the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Code of Professional Conduct in her being unreliable, dishonest and deceitful. Andrea has the responsibility of protecting her client, which involves encouraging the correction of financial statements in order to prevent suspicion during audits that could lead to fines and imprisonment. Andrea’s second option is to inform the limited partners about how misrepresentations of Skyline Views’s financial statements are permitting Ed to claim a higher management fee; this decision will fulfill her due diligence obligation to the limited partners while maintaining her integrity as a certified public accountant in supporting the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Code of Professional Conduct.
Auditors do not provide audit opinions for different levels of assurance. Therefore, auditors consider providing more or less assurance when modifying evidence for engagement risk to be unnecessary. However, auditors should be professionally responsible to accumulate additional evidence, assign more experienced personnel, and review the audit more thoroughly, particularly when a client poses a higher than normal degree of engagement risk. The auditor should also modify evidence for engagement risk when high legal exposure and other potential actions affecting the auditor
This organization has been setting ethical standards and publishing the Code of Professional Conduct for the profession since the early 1900s. A Code of Professional Conduct is necessary for any profession to help maintain strict ethical standards. This organization is the basis of ethical reasoning in the accounting profession because of what the Code of Professional Conduct covers. The code is comprised of a preamble and six articles. The preamble and the six articles serve as a foundation to provide guidance and guidelines for accountants to overcome any emerging ethical issues with ease on a daily basis. The six articles’ purpose is to protect the public, investors, and creditors. The AICPA Code of Professional Conduct consists of: Responsibility, Public Interest, Integrity, Objectivity and Independence, Due Care, and Scope and Nature of
Throughout the past several years major corporate scandals have rocked the economy and hurt investor confidence. The largest bankruptcies in history have resulted from greedy executives that “cook the books” to gain the numbers they want. These scandals typically involve complex methods for misusing or misdirecting funds, overstating revenues, understating expenses, overstating the value of assets or underreporting of liabilities, sometimes with the cooperation of officials in other corporations (Medura 1-3). In response to the increasing number of scandals the US government amended the Sarbanes Oxley act of 2002 to mitigate these problems. Sarbanes Oxley has extensive regulations that hold the CEO and top executives responsible for the numbers they report but problems still occur. To ensure proper accounting standards have been used Sarbanes Oxley also requires that public companies be audited by accounting firms (Livingstone). The problem is that the accounting firms are also public companies that also have to look after their bottom line while still remaining objective with the corporations they audit. When an accounting firm is hired the company that hired them has the power in the relationship. When the company has the power they can bully the firm into doing what they tell them to do. The accounting firm then loses its objectivity and independence making their job ineffective and not accomplishing their goal of honest accounting (Gerard). Their have been 379 convictions of fraud to date, and 3 to 6 new cases opening per month. The problem has clearly not been solved (Ulinski).
Integrity which is demonstrated by acceptance in decision making, having honest communication and activities with ethical practices that demand trust and support
In conclusion, appropriate principles could lead to clearer interaction and more comparable financial reporting standards without the need of the current rules. The NZ Framework has provided parts of clear and appropriate underlying principles to lead the application of NZ GAAP and other financial reporting standards. However the standards setting movement from ‘rule-driven’ approach to ‘principle-based’ approach is still half-way in New Zealand. How could principles be sufficiently clearly portrayed and put into practice require the profession to think and support. Just as Tweedie (2007, p.7) states, a principle based system will only work if preparers, auditors, users and regulators wish to make it work.
Clients want accountants with integrity. Thus, integrity is critical to the public trust. As a matter of fact, one of the general definitions of integrity provided by the AICPA Code is that it is a quality from which the public trust derives. Also, it is an element of character fundamental to professional recognition, and it requires members to be (among other things) honest and candid within the constraints of confidentiality (Duska, Duska & Ragatz, 2011).
...eputation of honesty, quality, and integrity. It is also each employee’s responsibility to report to the company any situation where the standards or the laws are being violated.
Ethical and legal obligations apply to all members of society. As one in society, the obligation to act in an ethical, law abiding manner on a daily basis is vital to the integrity of daily life. Many professions have their own code of ethics. Financial reporting is not exempt from such ethical and legal standards. One’s lively hood depends on decisions made in the business world. Business transactions are done daily and can impact one’s economic stability. Trust is placed in the hands of corporate America and an obligation of financial reporting to reveal a complete honest and legal picture of an entity’s accounting practices is important in attaining trust. This paper will discuss the obligations of legal and ethical standards of practice in the financial spectrum.
Within the current crisis of confidence in the public accounting profession after the Enron debacle and series of high profile failures of financial services firms, the issues about ‘audit expectation gap’ have never been more important. Though it would take an enormous amount of effort to address these issues, I will argue that tremendous amounts could be done in order to close the gap down. In this essay I will discuss some of these issues and in particular the strategies to reduce the gap.
I strive to embody integrity in everything that I strive to do. This means that each and every one of my actions must encompass and demonstrate the values I possess, no matter what the context of the situation. Additionally adhere to high moral principles and professional standards put forth by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. Secondly, I believe that it is important to be honest and respectful. I desire to express truth in every written and spoken word. Presenting information in a fair and impartial way when it comes to performing accounting duties is necessary in a profession that serves the public interest. I believe that being respectful means showing consideration and thoughtfulness in my relationships with my fellow those that I come into contact with. This goes hand in hand in treating everyone from fami...
The Code of Ethics of the professional accounting bodies in Australia and its fundamental principles ………………………………………………………………………….…………3
The code of ethics promotes the ethical values that internal auditing professionals are to uphold and practice by. The first principle in the code of ethics is integrity. The integrity of an internal auditor builds the foundation for trust with the client; if a client trust’s the auditor the communication process will be smoother when delivering difficult messages. The second principle is objectivity. Objectivity requires an internal auditor to preform and report the results of the audit without any bias. Objectivity aids in the delivery of grim news because the stakeholders can be assured that the findings and reports are the truth and aren’t swayed by the dislike or favoritism by the auditor. The objectivity principle also requires an internal auditor to disclose all material known facts so the stakeholders have the full picture and not just bits and pieces that could alternate the overall impression of the final report. Another principle within the code of ethics is competency. The competency requirement ensures that an internal auditor can’t perform and audit in which they don’t have the expertise or knowledge. Knowing that the auditor performing the audit and delivering the difficult findings and messages is competent and knowledgeable in what they are doing eases the communication process. Clients have the security and comfort of knowing that the auditor isn’t just pulling something out of a hat so that it appears as though they know what they are talking about. The auditor must actually understand the rules, regulations, laws, and obligations a company has to abide by before even entering into an auditing
Dowd (2016) runs above and beyond with the clarification to state accounting fraud incorporates the change of accounting records in regards to sales, incomes, costs and different components for a profit motive, for example, boosting organization stock prices, getting ideal financing or maintaining a strategic distance from obligation commitments. Dowd is of the feeling that covetousness, absence of straightforwardness, poor administration data and poor accounting interior controls are a couple of explanations behind accounting fraud. (Dowd,
In the contemporary society, unethical and illegitimate activities within organisations are increasing, in order to remain competitive. Examples of violations are disrespectful behavior, non-compliance to company’s policies, unlawful conduct such as misuse of company’s fund and sharing of confidential information. In fact, all these activities cost a lot and organisations have to bear the consequences. Such consequences include tarnished reputation of the company, loss of trust among its stakeholders and unable to recruit the best talents in the industry. Studies have shown that many companies only realize the importance of ethical business practice after their wrongdoings are made known to the public. (Green 1997)