Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Habitat loss and biodiversity conclusion
Habitat loss and biodiversity conclusion
Endangered species act (ESA)
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Habitat loss and biodiversity conclusion
As humans we have left more than a carbon footprint these past centuries. But, what is purpose for inferior animals since that is issue at hand? What is the limit when there are no factual limitations? There are so many questions, but yet few answers. Many philosophers and environmentalists argue various points regarding the humanity of animals. Furthermore, endangered, threatened, and extinct species further brings the argument if endangered species worth the fight.
How Much Does it Cost?
In 1973 the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was created to conserve threatened and endangered plants and animals, and the habitats in which they found . Since then species still have depleted from existence. Critics revolving argument if ESA is a sufficient organization that is preserving the lives of these endangered or threatened species. Studies show in 2006 – 2011 ESA was able to maintain an average 415 species on the endangered species category. Within a ten year range ESA spent $508,704,000 solely on preserving endangered species. Therefore, the cost Waterfrank was implying to is in fact a large dent in our wallets, and yet the results, appears to be bleak. Or should we be satisfied with the numbers on table one. ESA has an ongoing battle with various obstacles that has depleted the species types list in table one. The variables include, but not limited to are habitat destruction, overexploitation, and introduction of exotic species .
In July 2006 a federal judge halted a $320,000,000 irrigation project for fear it could disturb the habitat of a woodpecker that may or may not be extinct. The dispute involves the ivory-billed woodpecker. That last confirmed sighting of the bird in North America was 1944, and scientists had thought the spe...
... middle of paper ...
...r Bighorn Sheep." . Big Horn Institution, n.d. Web. 29 Nov 2011. .
Rolston, III, Holmes. "Environmental Ethics: Values in and Duties to the Natural World ." . The Broken Circle: Ecology, Economics, Eth, 1991. Web. 29 Nov 2011. .
Rolston,III, Holmes. Higher Animals: Duties to Sentient Life. Philadelphia: Temple University, 1988. eBook.
Schlickeisen, Rodger (1998, Dec 29) Conservation; At 25, Endangered Species Act Among Our Most Effective Laws Dayton Daily News
Kohak, Erazim V. "Part II." The Green Halo: a Bird's-eye View of Ecological Ethics. Chicago,
Everybody knows that to have a good social life one needs to have good ethics, but what about using those ethics in the natural environment. Many people tend to say that they are well-educated, with a high use of ethics, but it seems useless in the real world. Society needs to start to worry about the environment and not only about what one wants or need. Aldo Leopold describe how ethics in an ecological and philosophical view today needs to changed to have a good use of them. Leopold was one of the founders of the Wilderness society. At the same time, he initiated the first Forest Wilderness Area in the United States. This two are just some of the societies and jobs in which he was involved that have to do with the natural environment. During
Mr. Middleton, a journalist, compiled an article describing, in his opinion, the flaws of the Endangered Species Act. He then attempts to back his opinion with studied analyses, researched facts, and testimonies. To summarize Middleton’s (2011) perspective, “Rather than provide incentives for conservation and environmental stewardship, the Endangered Species Act punishes those whose property contains land that might be used as habitat by endangered and threatened species” (p. 79). This quote is broad and generalized yet draws in readers and forces Middleton to spend the rest of the article backing this statement with more logic based facts.
Zsolnai, L. (2011). Environmental ethics for business sustainability. International Journal of Social Economics, 38(11), 892-899. doi: 10.1108/03068291111171397
9. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service: The Endangered Species Act of 1973. Department of the
Leopold, Aldo. “The Land Ethic” in Environmental Ethics edited by David Schmidtz and Elizabeth Willott. Oxford University Press, New York. 2002. p. 27-32.
Armstrong, Susan Jean, and Richard George Botzler. The Animal Ethics Reader. London ;New York, NY: Routledge, 2008. Print.
Having considered both sides of the argument surrounding the Endangered Species Act, it seems logical to conclude that, despite the fact that they Endangered Species Act could stand some improvement in terms of the speed of the bureaucracy that governs it, the Act itself is quite sufficient as is as long as it is administered to the full extent of its power. There is a growing tendency in government, however, to undermine the strength of the Endangered Species Act by making decisions on when and where to apply it a political matter rather than an ecological matter (Munro, 2010). To do this is to insure that ultimately it will not just be the environment and the wile organisms that live in it that will lose, it will be mankind as well.
In his essay, The Ethics of Respect for Nature, Paul Taylor presents his argument for a deontological, biocentric egalitarian attitude toward nature based on the conviction that all living things possess equal intrinsic value and are worthy of the same moral consideration. Taylor offers four main premises to support his position. (1) Humans are members of the “Earth’s community of life” in the same capacity that nonhuman members are. (2) All species exist as a “complex web of interconnected elements” which are dependent upon one another for their well-being. (3) Individual organisms are “teleological centers of life” which possess a good of their own and a unique way in which to pursue it. (4) The concept that humans are superior to other species is an unsupported anthropocentric bias.
The endangered species act is a very powerful law. It has saved many species and it’s still protecting the endangered habitat of various animals. Even though the law regulates rules, there are many people that disobey the law and make it hard for endangered species to continue their life without interruptions. Many challenges are formed and obstacles make the ESA challenging to take
In the year 1973, the Endangered Species Act (ESA) was instituted in order to bring attention to the issue of species that are in danger of extinction as well as to provide conservation of species that are endangered or threatened. Currently, there are around 2,245 species that the Endangered Species Act lists as either endangered or threatened throughout the world, many of which are found in the United States ecosystems and a handful that are only found in foreign ecosystems (Ehrlich 12). Because of the considerable number of endangered species, people should be aware of endangered species and help to protect these creatures society, as their unnatural extinction due to our actions and neglect will affect ecosystems and the environment (“Why
At present, of the 150,000 protected areas across the world, just 3% are in the oceans. As countries introduce measures to improve protection, it is important that the governments and the environmental agencies select sites for regulation.”(Schofield 834-836). This states that the government should improve their ways of assisting in care for the endangered species, but it is still quite expensive for them to do so. Well just how good are researchers doing in keeping up with all the
Ecological theories and environmental ethics are reciprocally and dynamically linked. Inquiry into this thesis can provide epistemological and ethical insights for ecologists and environmental philosophers. First, for ecologists it clarifies that environmental ethics is not purely a normative corpus that we should adopt under the pressure of an environmental crisis. Ethical conceptions participate in the genesis and evaluation of ecological theories. Second, environmental philosophers have tended to focus on how ecological sciences could inform environmental ethics. I emphasize, in turn, that it is valuable to analyze and to discuss how ethical conceptions can and do inform ecological sciences.
In our world today we have approximately 26,021 endangered species. Endangered species are organisms that may possible become extinct. The term 'endangered species' refers to all species that fits this description. However some conservation biologists and scientists normally use the term ‘endangered species’ to refer to species that are put on the IUCN(International Union for Conservation of Nature)Red List. Many factors can be looked at when considering the conservation status of a species. Factors such as human threats or environmental threats can cause a species to become endangered.