EMR Implementation Part III

1839 Words4 Pages

EMR Implementation Part III

The EMR system provides adequate assistance and support for the clinician. This system reduces the chances of errors and increases efficiency in research facilities. This paper includes a summary from previous plans developed in the implementation of these proposed changes. The effectiveness of these changes carried out, measurement strategies, costs, and satisfaction with the EMR system implementations are points of analysis in this presentation.

This organization in Miami, Florida conducts research to the biotech industry. The upcoming clinical pharmacological testing in a patient with diseases accelerates the needed of the EMR system in this research facility. Some financial issues, inadequate technical support, and government requirements are organizational barriers, which affect the implementation of these changes. Individual’s barriers affect the implementation of the EMR system as well as the required training from staff, resistance to change, and loss of status quo from employees. The EMR implementation has to lead to improve patient safety, and reduction in medical errors. The competitive external environment demands in this organization the implementation of this system. For the readiness in this process, the organization could develop objectives, policies and conduct a several workshops to build consensus for the key deliverables. The Kurt Lewin’s theoretical models apply to implementation to these changes, external forces driven to executives and employees to identify the needed of changes, and the implementation of this system (Spector, 2010). Internal sources as well as human source, leadership, and the experience from employees guarantees the implementation of this system. External fa...

... middle of paper ...

...onclusion

The EMR system develops an organizational transformation. This system merges the technology and operational process to achieve value and intelligence for clinical care delivery. The EMR transforms the workplace achieving change through communication; reinforce the governance and leadership knowledge, and management the organization culture. The system motivates sustainable changes for the benefits in the processes of this organization. The implementation of EMR increases the clinical process optimization for the standardization, and efficiency in care delivery by this institution. The system allows the provider engagement in the development; adoption, acceptance, and accountability for care delivery process create more physician integration. Finally, the patient safety increase and the organization gain more reputation in the community (Synor, 2009).

Open Document