Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Impact of work environment on employee turnover
Employee retention a review of literature
Research proposal on the impact of employee turnover
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Impact of work environment on employee turnover
Introduction
Retail stores provide much of people’s daily necessities: clothing, food, furniture, etc. Although much of the retail environment helps to keep society running smoothly, most of the operations behind retail stores don’t run as that. According to CNBC, in 2013 when the economy was at rise, the average turnover rate for retail stores was 74.9%. Retail is a field that is branded by several different events such as grand openings, store failures, new products, and employee turnover (Darden, Hampton & Boatwright, 1987). Employee voluntary turnover, the proportion of employees who leave an organization over a set period of time, has a negative effect on the rest of the company (Smith & Macko, 2014). The most common complaints among
…show more content…
Darden et al. argues that causes of employee turnover can be categorized in to three different kinds of factors: 1) work-related factors, 2) personal factors, and 3) external factors (1987). Work related factors include pay, performance, job satisfaction, coworkers; personal factors include level of education, age, job tenure; and external factors include unemployment rates, union presence, and perceptions on employment (1987). Work-related factors tend to be the most obvious causes of voluntary turnover to employees. Factors such as pay, performance and coworkers all lead to the level of job satisfaction for the employee. Job satisfaction is typically described as the degree to which an employee is content with his or her job (Davis, Trevor & Feng, 2015). Job satisfaction is the most studied variable in studies relating to turnover rates, however, the two are not as strongly related as most people would predict (Darden, Hampton & Boatwright, 1987). These authors suggest that other factors such as organizational commitment and pay are also closely related to dissatisfaction in the workplace and turnover rates (1987). Smith and Macko back this research by also stating that the three main factors involved in turnover are external business environment such as unemployment rates, the personal element such as inter-role …show more content…
Employee engagement has been a more contemporary topic in the recent years, and is based upon the employee-employer interaction (Smith & Macko, 2014). Employee engagement tends to be best when employers demonstrate they are committed to the employees by providing them with benefits and advancement opportunities, and when employees, in return, demonstrate loyalty and motivation towards the company (Smith & Macko, 2014). One problem that is typically ran in to when studying turnover is that it is hard to question an employee when they have left the company. For this reason, these researchers studied employees’ intent to leave (Smith & Macko, 2014). The researchers found that some causes to low levels of employee engagement were lack of communication from upper management, negative perception of management and employees’ lack of involvement in company decisions (2014). Other research on employee engagement suggests that there are three different types of engagement: cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, and behavioral engagement (Shuck, Twyford, Reio, & Shuck, 2014). Cognitive engagement comes from the employee’s feelings of meaning, safety (physically, mentally, and psychologically), and well-being in the workplace, while emotional engagement is better
Workers feeling, which includes competitive compensation and reward strategies, professional growth and development, career paths and succession plans and the organizations leadership and culture are contributing factors of employee engagement
Boston, MA: Pearson Sivarethinamohan, R. R., & Aranganathan, P. P. (2011). Determinants of employee engagement
I am a shift leader for Walgreens Inc. I work at one of the financially worst stores in the district. The possibility of the store being close is even greater because the store cannot meet sale goals. Naturally, the heaviest burden is places on the team members. For example, team members losing hours, causing team members to lose sales, more responsibility placed on team members, and less chances for team members to recharge and relax. Eventually, these changes in the workplace dynamic could cause severe reductions in team members’ morale, in an otherwise normally positive and happy staff. Therefore in this paper, I will provide ground breaking research that explains the issues of low staff morale and propose ideas for coping with
One indicator that there is a problem with employee satisfaction is that multiple, valued employees have left for other jobs citing low job satisfaction and cultural problems as their primary motivations for leaving. These employees asked for exit interviews and were disappointed that they had to request them. As further evidence that this problem exists, employees often answer informal questions about teamwork, job satisfaction, accountability and communication in a negative way. To gather further evidence of this problem, I propose that a survey be conducted to all employees to collect formal data on employee satisfaction and morale, among other things.
From the perspective of the retail employee, the world is always ending. The store is always a mess and the customers are always rude. There have been countless stories and memes about the types of customers that retail workers have had to deal with, whether it is the “Can I speak to a manager?” haircut, obnoxious prepubescent
Rich, B., Lepine, J., & Crawford, E. (2010). Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance. Academy Of Management Journal, 53(3), 617-635. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Academic instruments exist to measure discrete sub-dimensions of employee engagement, such as the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale (Schaufeli and Bakker, 2003) that measures the vigor, absorption and dedication dimensions of work engagement, but no uniform tool exists to measure the construct when conceptualized beyond work engagement (Macey and Schneider, 2008; Kamposo and Sridevi, 2010). Practitioners utilize a variety of tools to measure their conceptualizations of employee engagement, including the Gallup 12-item Worker Engagement Index (Gallup, 2013), and a variety of proprietary instruments from management and human resource consulting
The study of employee engagement has been a steady increase over the last ten years, due to the fact that employee engagement has a significant factor in an organization 's success and competitive advantages (Saks & Gurman, 2014). Employee engagement is defined as employees who are engaged “for the best interest of the organization, and it is associated with meaningfulness, safety, and ability” (Abu-Shamaa, Al-Rabayah & Khasawneh 2015). This results in employees being dedicated, focus and willing to do what it takes to get the tasks done. Similarly, having the effectiveness of value and pride towards their work. In contrast, employee burnout is the opposite of employee engagement. Burnout is a “syndrome of weariness with work
Employee satisfaction, employee turnover, and workplace environment are inseparably linked. Workplace environments heavily influence employee satisfaction, which directly affects employee turnover rates. When employees feel they are not being supported within their first months of hire, they will inevitably leave the company. Employees want to have the security that if they need assistance, someone will be there to guide them. Therefore, it is imperative for organizations to develop a thorough onboarding program and a long-term retention plan.
Definition. Schaufeli’s (as cited in Truss, Delbridge, Alfes, Shantz, & Soane, 2014, p. 26) ideas on employee engagement can be explained by using the Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model. Job demands and availability or lack of resources, both job and personal, either contribute to or deter employee engagement, this is illustrated by the JD-R (Truss et al., 2014). On the positive side, according to Truss et al. (2014) job and personal resources “foster engagement in terms of vigor (energy), dedication (persistence) and absorption (focus)” (p. 26). An employee who has the resources needed to do their job is better equipped to do the job and thereby better able to perform their job (Truss et al., 2014). Employees who are better able to meet job
Price, A. (2011). Employee Engagement. In B. George (Eds.), Human Resource Management (235 - 259). Hampshire: Cengage Learning EMEA.
Here are some figures that display how Employee engagement practices have bolstered up the efficiency and productivity of the employees and in return have augmented the profits of the companies. According to a new meta-analysis that was conducted by the Gallup organisation amongst 1.4 million employees, the organisations that focus on employee engagement practices to a large extent have reported 22% increase in productivity. These practices even impr...
In many organisations, managers and bosses have found it a struggle implementing successful strategies to improve job satisfaction and productivity among its employees. While dealing with unproductive, unmotivated and unsatisfied employees, there is an increased risk for turnover, which can be prevented. The risk of high turnover is a problem to workplaces as turnover has been proven to ‘take its toll’ on productivity as it disrupts current projects and increases workloads for other employees. It also has a negative impact on team cohesion (Patrick and Sonia, 2012). Job satisfaction is one’s general attitude to the job, and higher the job satisfaction, the more likely he/she will hold a positive attitude towards their job (De Menzes, 2011). De Menzes (2011) believes that employees who are satisfied with their jobs are likely to be more committed to their organisation and be more productive. People are significantly more productive when they are content and achieving individual and organisational goals are able to be fulfilled in a work environment where employees feel happy and motivated. Interventions which can be used to improve job satisfaction and productivity to decrease rates of turnover and unmotivated employees include an increase in workplace training, as well as performance pay.
673), retention management must be based on three types of turnover, voluntary, discharged, and downsizing. Not all businesses are freighted by turnovers, for some it is the way of life and cost is built into the budget. However, for others any type of high turnover can be detrimental for company profit, employee wage and benefits offered. First, let’s take a look at voluntary and involuntary turnover that affects retention. Voluntary turnovers are caused by many different reasons. Turnover may result from topics such as job dissatisfaction, job mismatching, knowing that job opportunities are plentiful. Two reasons that I will discuss more are micromanagement and employee loyalty. Like stated before in the introduction, when employees are dissatisfied, possibly due to being placed in an area that doesn’t fit with their skill set, one is more likely to seek new employment. Another part of turnover is discharging and downsizing. Discharge is just that, members being discharged due to discipline and job performance. While downsizing turnover is a result of business being overstaffed (Heneman III, Judge, Kammeyer-Mueller, 2015, pg. 675). There are also other reasons for voluntarily employee turnover, such as generation differences when it relates to employment. The current generations are more likely to see a job as one piece in their life puzzle rather than as the first, indispensable anchor piece without
Employee turnover in organization is one of the main issues that extensively affect the overall performance of a workplace (Tariq, Ramzan and Riaz, 2013). Various studies show that employee turnover negatively affect the overall efficiency at the organization (Tariq, Ramzan and Riaz, 2013). Xiancheng, (2013) mentioned the employee turnover is a method of personal issues who decided to stop associate with the company for better advantage. There are two types of turnover which are voluntary and involuntary turnover. Voluntary turnover can be defined as the termination of the official and the psychological contract between the employee and employer (Krausz, 2002; Macdonald, 1999; Mclean Parks et al, 1999; Rousseau, 1995) while involuntary turnover inescapably lead to direct negative results such as current job is insecurity, work difficulty, and status fluctuation (Gowan and Gatewood, 1997). However, other researchers such as Haven-Tang and Jones, (2012) concluded poor management, lack of salary, bad working environment and paucity of job opportunities could be the highest causes of turnover among organization. This statement was support by Kusluvan et al., (2010) where is they had stated that poor management, low payment of salary, work environment and lack of employees’ job opportunities on the organization will make employee want to quit from their job. Turnover intention situation will appear when labour had feeling that they want to quit from current job, so voluntary and involuntary turnover will become final stage for them as their decision (AlBattat and Mat Som, 2013) but it is different for researchers such as Mosadeghrad, Ferlie and Rosbenberg (2013) when they conclude that employee turno...